August 2017 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 11251] Be able to configure HTML Opac preferences per library
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '17

24 Aug '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11251 verolencinas <verolencinas(a)yahoo.com.ar> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |verolencinas(a)yahoo.com.ar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 10306] Koha to MARC mappings (Part 1): Allow multiple mappings per kohafield (for say 260/RDA 264)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '17

24 Aug '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10306 --- Comment #52 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- Just wanted to cheer for this one some more... looking forward to its addition to Koha! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15562] Make Koha more suitable for shared hosting with plack
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '17

24 Aug '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15562 --- Comment #67 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Srdjan Jankovic from comment #66) > That was exactly my point with Context. There should be no references to > *anything* external (db, cache etc handles) outside Context. Now because we > are still in this CGI frame of mind, we have all this horrible singletons. > Once we are able to instantiate contexts and keep them in app containers, > and pass them to request handlers we will be safe. Agreed! Even if these patches don't go in, I figure it's worthwhile getting rid of the singletons even for the sake of testing and flexibility. (On an unrelated note, I just noticed Starman can listen on Unix sockets, and I recall Nginx being able to reverse proxy to Unix sockets. Apparently Apache 2.4.7+ can as well. I wonder what kind of performance boost that would give. Actually, say the OPAC was separate but still server-side and using an API, calls to a Koha API over a Unix socket would probably be rather fast. I wonder if you could have a single Koha API process which needs the most resources and then have separate smaller processes for the OPAC (and perhaps staff client). Or not even have an OPAC and just let other services access the API. Although I suppose as a project we'd want to have a default OPAC app for an all-in-one solution. I suppose the architecture depends on the scale needed for Koha too. Probably easier to scale up by having lighter clients connecting to APIs and have it all service based. But then also more complicated to set up and maintain. Actually, I was also pondering having a single persistent Koha API process and then serving the OPAC (and staff client) via CGI. If they're lightweight and most of the heavy lifting is done by the API, maybe that would be a reasonable way to have a large multitenant system. But maybe that just sounds better in theory than it would be in practice. For things like record uploads, that's probably not feasible and would just involve double-handling and double-parsing. Oh well. I'll stop rambling now...) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15283] Switch default ISSUEQSLIP notice to Template Toolkit
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '17

24 Aug '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15283 Liz Rea <liz(a)catalyst.net.nz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.koha-community | |.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi | |?id=19167 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 2093] Add OPAC dashboard for logged-in users
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 24 Aug '17

24 Aug '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=2093 --- Comment #14 from Aleisha Amohia <aleisha(a)catalyst.net.nz> --- (In reply to Hugo Agud from comment #13) > patch tested and it works fine! > > but test fail > > Test Summary Report > ------------------- > t/Creators.t (Wstat: 6400 Tests: 39 Failed: 0) > Non-zero exit status: 25 > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 41 tests but ran 39. > Files=98, Tests=7437, 238 wallclock secs ( 1.18 usr 0.18 sys + 217.40 cusr > 4.47 csys = 223.23 CPU) > Result: FAIL Hi Hugo all tests pass before and after this patch for me. aleisha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15283] Switch default ISSUEQSLIP notice to Template Toolkit
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Aug '17

23 Aug '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15283 Liz Rea <liz(a)catalyst.net.nz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |liz(a)catalyst.net.nz --- Comment #9 from Liz Rea <liz(a)catalyst.net.nz> --- Also we really need bits of this, specifically "is_from_today" in Checkout.pm independent of this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 10260] way to enter a note when writing off
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Aug '17

23 Aug '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10260 Lisette <lisetteslatah(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lisetteslatah(a)gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Lisette <lisetteslatah(a)gmail.com> --- Still valid? It does let you put a note in. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 2786] Allow waiting holds to be diverted to different branch
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Aug '17

23 Aug '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=2786 --- Comment #4 from Lisette <lisetteslatah(a)gmail.com> --- This would be great. We have 7 branches and still in 16.05 often have this problem, especially with new items. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 9228] log of messages left
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Aug '17

23 Aug '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9228 --- Comment #2 from Lisette <lisetteslatah(a)gmail.com> --- Is this still valid? It does show up in the patron modification log on my system, at least if they were deleted in the last 3 months. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14826] Resurrect account offsets table
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Aug '17

23 Aug '17

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14826 Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Passed QA --- Comment #91 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen(a)gmail.com> --- This patch set is actually pretty simple and is not changing any behaviour (besides the side effect of recording the account offsets on each operation that involves charges/payments). It passes the usual QA tests, and opens the door for really cool and missing features in Koha (see the blocked bugs and it becomes obvious). My only observation would be that the 'type' column values should somehow be better controlled (possibly an ENUM, or better a FK to a separate table). This would set a clearer path for eventual added flexibility and avoiding migration/upgrades nightmares. Congrats Kyle! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0