November 2018 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 18138] New: Use MARC modification template when adding/ updating bibliographic records
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Feb '24

29 Feb '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18138 Bug ID: 18138 Summary: Use MARC modification template when adding/updating bibliographic records Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: stefan.berndtsson(a)ub.gu.se QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl When importing records, MARC modification templates can be used to silently remove unwanted tags among other thing. The same thing could be useful when adding/updating bibliographic records from within Koha. I therefor propose an addition of a SysPref to set a default template to use in AddBiblio and ModBiblio before TransformMarcToKoha is called. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 117

[Bug 17975] New: TT syntax for notices - Prove that HOLD_SLIP is compatible
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Feb '24

16 Feb '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17975 Bug ID: 17975 Summary: TT syntax for notices - Prove that HOLD_SLIP is compatible Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 21

[Bug 21858] New: RFC: Notices and slips documentation
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Feb '24

15 Feb '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21858 Bug ID: 21858 Summary: RFC: Notices and slips documentation Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Developer documentation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: barton(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Koha doesn't currently have a single point of truth for documentation of notices and slips, which has lead to a proliferation of markup syntaxes, especially in regard to repeating detail, e.g. DUEDGST/PREDUEDGST: <<items.content>> ODUE* <<items.content>> or <item> </item> CHECKOUT/CHECKIN/RENEWAL ---- Detail here ---- These have been documented in https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Customising_Notices_and_Slips#Notice_M… , but this has gotten out of date as new notices get added in each version of Koha. Work to be done: Add Koha/Notices.pod which will document the following for each notice in the Letter table: * Letter Code * Source file where the notice is populated * Logic that triggers the notice * Detail syntax (if any) * Available data (tables and substitutions) * Message transport restrictions The output from this pod should be used as the basis for the Koha user documentation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 17967] New: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Feb '24

15 Feb '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967 Bug ID: 17967 Summary: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 17427] New: Replace CGI::Session with Data::Session
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Feb '24

15 Feb '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17427 Bug ID: 17427 Summary: Replace CGI::Session with Data::Session Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CGI::Session is not maintained for ages and seems quite buggy. It would be the culprit of random logout problems. Another issue is the following crazy code in CGI::Session::Driver::DBI sub DESTROY { my $self = shift; unless ( defined $self->{Handle} && $self->{Handle} -> ping ) { $self->set_error(__PACKAGE__ . '::DESTROY(). Database handle has gone away'); return; } unless ( $self->{Handle}->{AutoCommit} ) { $self->{Handle}->commit; } if ( $self->{_disconnect} ) { $self->{Handle}->disconnect; } } If AutoCommit is off, it will commit anyway... It causes some tests to fail (api) if SessionStorage is set to MySQL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 131

[Bug 17120] New: Specify number of rows per page in report and initial run
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Feb '24

14 Feb '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17120 Bug ID: 17120 Summary: Specify number of rows per page in report and initial run Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Reports Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org I think we could enhance reports so that the &limit= parameter could be initially set with the report settings and stored in a field in the table. I also think we could have the drop down available on the parameters page when running the report the first time. If you have a report you know that would run well and could be completely shown with more rows, why not have the option to initially set it differently than the default? The LIMIT command in SQL is okay and works for actually limiting the total number of results, but does weird things if you specify a number larger than 20. The results still span multiple pages, plus it doesn't give you options while running like this would. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 21862] New: Outdated translation credits
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Feb '24

13 Feb '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21862 Bug ID: 21862 Summary: Outdated translation credits Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: About Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: dimantonak(a)gmail.com, katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de, martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com, nick(a)bywatersolutions.com, testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 17597 We should feed the `about > translations` page using the information available on Pootle, updating it regularly for each release. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17597 [Bug 17597] Outdated translation credits -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 21825] New: UNIMARC Authority subfields missing 'u'
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Feb '24

13 Feb '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21825 Bug ID: 21825 Summary: UNIMARC Authority subfields missing 'u' Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Whilst QAing bug 19365 I spotted that the subfields string contains all of the alphabet except for 'u' and I wondered whether this was deliberate or a mistake? When asking the question on IRC it sounded as though subfield 'u' may well be used but we wanted to defer to some more expert cataloguers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 21773] New: Increase minimum MockModule version (and switch to ->redefine)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Feb '24

13 Feb '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21773 Bug ID: 21773 Summary: Increase minimum MockModule version (and switch to ->redefine) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Our minimum version of MockModule is very low and as such doesn't support the safer 'redefined' method. If at all possible, it would be great to up this module version and replace our calls to mock with calls to redefine so we can catch when methods are renamed or removed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 21386] New: Receive shipment from vendor X: Items expected is never more than 0
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Feb '24

13 Feb '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21386 Bug ID: 21386 Summary: Receive shipment from vendor X: Items expected is never more than 0 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org I'm not sure what the point of this field is on this page in the summary of invoices table, but I can never get it to show anything other than 0. Do we know what it was intended to show and if it's still relevant? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 4