November 2018 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 19814] New: Batch Check-in function
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Jul '26

14 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19814 Bug ID: 19814 Summary: Batch Check-in function Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: new feature Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: smichaelxx(a)tlen.pl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Hi, in Koha exists function named "Batch Check out" but there is no "Batch Check in". A lot of small libraries don't have self-check station. Maybe a good solution would be adding function "Batch Check in"? Thanks a lot Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 102

[Bug 21860] New: Marc modification templates cannot check or change indicators
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Jul '26

13 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21860 Bug ID: 21860 Summary: Marc modification templates cannot check or change indicators Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pasi.kallinen(a)joensuu.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The marc modification templates have no way of checking or changing indicator values. This seems like a pretty big oversight. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 69

[Bug 18139] New: 'Too many checked out' can confuse librarians
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Jul '26

12 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18139 Bug ID: 18139 Summary: 'Too many checked out' can confuse librarians Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com The too many checked out message can be very confusing for librarians when the limit specified is more or less than the number of checkouts the patron already has. We should make it clear to the librarian that this is only counting certain types of checkouts by giving them the issuing rule criteria used. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 54

[Bug 21820] New: Zebraqueue should not be added to
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 08 Jul '26

08 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21820 Bug ID: 21820 Summary: Zebraqueue should not be added to Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com In bug 20244 we identified that the zebraqueue is still being appended to when the searchengine preference is set to ElasticSearch.. unfortunately zebra may still be in use in parallel to Elastic to provide a public SRU/z3950 gateway.. as such we can't bind on just the syspref to know whether we should stop adding to the zebraqueue or not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 53

[Bug 21391] New: Add per user interface settings
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 08 Jul '26

08 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21391 Bug ID: 21391 Summary: Add per user interface settings Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff Client Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: josef.moravec(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com There are some setting in system preference, which are related to user interface and could be useful to have an ability to set it for each user separately and use global preference as fallback only. For example: StaffLangSelectorMode AudioAlerts intranetbookbag IntranetCatalogSearchPulldown viewISBD viewLabeledMARC viewMARC hide_marc IntranetBiblioDefaultView advancedMARCeditor CircSidebar ExportCircHistory previousIssuesDefaultSortOrder todaysIssuesDefaultSortOrder EnableSearchHistory numSearchResults defaultSortField defaultSortOrder displayFacetCount expandedSearchOption NumSavedReports And in the future the cash register from Bug 11373 There could be admin page where the system administrator could enable/disable the settings for users and then in users menu could be new item - interface settings where users could change their preferences. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 14

[Bug 19822] New: Add system preferences for ILL Module
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Jul '26

07 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19822 Bug ID: 19822 Summary: Add system preferences for ILL Module Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com Depends on: 7317 Right now, the ILL module is only configurable through the .conf file on the server. It would be great if we could add system preferences so that the configuration can be done through Koha's staff interface. - Tab in system preferences for all ILL configurations - Make StaffRequestComments (hide/show) a sys pref - Make ReplyDate (hide/show) a sys pref - Make DigitalRecipient (borrower/branch) a sys pref - Make PartnerCode (text entry, with by default ILLLIBS entered) a sys pref Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7317 [Bug 7317] Add an Interlibrary Loan Module to Circulation and OPAC -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 40

[Bug 20985] New: CanBookBeReserved and CanItemBeReserved should check 'On shelf holds allowed' policy
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Jul '26

07 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20985 Bug ID: 20985 Summary: CanBookBeReserved and CanItemBeReserved should check 'On shelf holds allowed' policy Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Via ILSDI we use the routines mentioned above to determine holdability, however, neither of these routines check on shelf hold policies -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 93

[Bug 20551] New: Add option for including deleted records in export_records.pl
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Jul '26

07 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20551 Bug ID: 20551 Summary: Add option for including deleted records in export_records.pl Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Command-line Utilities Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: glasklas(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: robin(a)catalyst.net.nz Add an option "--include_deleted" to also include possibly deleted biblios in export. This option can only be used together with --date, and --record-type=biblio. The rational behind this is that use case does not makes much sense (if you are doing a full export, why would you include deleted biblios) and thus some extra complexity can be avoided. Superficially related to https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17693, not really quite different as this includes the whole biblio-record (with record status set to "d" in leader) in the regular export, not just biblio ids. This is a requirement for synchronizing with the discovery-system we are currently using for example and imho is a more standard and MARC-compliant way of supporting export of record deletions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 184

[Bug 17748] New: Show due date and availability in item search results
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Jul '26

06 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17748 Bug ID: 17748 Summary: Show due date and availability in item search results Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff Client Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: christian.stelzenmueller(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com After searching an item, i. e. with barcode, you can't see wheter it is checked out or not. Therefore the due date and / or the availability of the item would be very helpful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 61

[Bug 21453] New: blinddetail-biblio-search.pl/.tt use hardcoded subfield values for MARC21
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jul '26

03 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21453 Bug ID: 21453 Summary: blinddetail-biblio-search.pl/.tt use hardcoded subfield values for MARC21 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: arouss1980(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If you add or alter an authority record and edit one of the MARC fields in UNIMARC 5XX 'See Also Reference Tracing Block' [1], you can click on the ellipsis (...) next to a subfield [2] to launch the authority finder plugin. This plugin allows you to search for an authority and then pick an entry from the 'Special relationship:' dropdown menu in order to set the relationship between the two authorities. The results list of the authority finder contains 'Choose' buttons which _should_ insert all data from the chosen authority into the appropriate subfields of the MARC tag you are editing [3]. However, in UNIMARC setups this does not work: clicking on 'Choose' only populates subfield $a ('Entry Element') with data, but not subfields $3 and $5 ('Authority Record Number' and 'Tracing Control', respectively), which are just as important for correct authority linking. I've tracked this down to these lines of code which are MARC21-specific and use hardcoded subfield values in blinddetail-biblio-search.pl: 91 for ( $field->subfields ) { 92 next if $_->[0] eq '9'; # $9 will be set with authid value 101 push( @subfield_loop, { marc_subfield => 'w', marc_values => $relationship } ) if ( $relationship ); There is also this code in the template blinddetail-biblio-search.tt: 38 [%- END -%]‡9[% authid | html %]"; 138 if(code.value=='9'){ 139 subfield.value = "[% authid |replace("'", "\'") |replace('"', '\"') |replace('\n', '\\n') |replace('\r', '\\r') %]"; These code fragments don't work 100% because in UNIMARC authorities the authid value is stored in subfield $3 and the relationship code in $5. I propose to modify the Perl script above (which is currently MARC flavour agnostic), have it check the 'marcflavour' system preference, and use that to decide which subfield to push the authority relator code to. A similar approach in the template file will set the authid subfield value depending on whether you are a MARC21 or UNIMARC user. [1] Known as the 'Related Access Point Block' in recent IFLA updates. [2] For the ellipsis to appear next to a subfield, you must view the MARC structure of the relevant authority type and then edit the subfields of the tag you're interested in. Finally, you must select an authority type from the 'Thesaurus:' dropdown menu. [3] Under the hood each 'Choose' button is a call to the JS function doauth(), which in turn calls blinddetail-biblio-search.pl with the parameters required (authid, relationship, etc.). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 39