April 2019 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 21955] New: Cache::Memory should not be used as L2 cache
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 18 Mar '25

18 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21955 Bug ID: 21955 Summary: Cache::Memory should not be used as L2 cache Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: critical Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If Plack is running with several workers we must not use Cache::Memory as L2 cache. If a value is set from a worker, it will not be available from other workers as the Cache::Memory instance is not shared (of course!) Moreover we now have Koha::Cache::Memory::Lite that does the same job, so we should not expect performance regressions by removing it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 23

[Bug 16196] New: Acquisitions Module Not Showing Subtotals
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 17 Mar '25

17 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16196 Bug ID: 16196 Summary: Acquisitions Module Not Showing Subtotals Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: amy(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Partner reports that when receiving books in the Acquisitions module, subtotals are not identifying which fund they are for. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 22531] New: Allow for multiple requests to partners and display partners in audit log
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Mar '25

13 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22531 Bug ID: 22531 Summary: Allow for multiple requests to partners and display partners in audit log Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew.isherwood(a)ptfs-europe.com Target Milestone: --- Currently, when an ILL request is sent to partners it is not possible to send to further partners, should the first partner not be able to fulfil the request. A better approach would be to allow the "Place request with partners" option to be selected even when this action has already taken place. This will allow the user to try multiple partners subsequently. As such, we should log which partners a request has been sent to and this information should be displayed in the "Display request log" functionality added in Bug 20750 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 54

[Bug 21383] New: Sorting on ILL request table is inaccurate
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Mar '25

12 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21383 Bug ID: 21383 Summary: Sorting on ILL request table is inaccurate Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew.isherwood(a)ptfs-europe.com In the ILL requests table, values containing numbers are sorted incorrectly. For example, AUB-1, AUB-10, AUB-11, AUB-20, AUB-21 etc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 21889] New: Include Staff Client entered Purchase Suggestions with System Preference maxopensuggestions
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Mar '25

11 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21889 Bug ID: 21889 Summary: Include Staff Client entered Purchase Suggestions with System Preference maxopensuggestions Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 18.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Currently only Purchase Suggestions made by patrons through the OPAC are the only suggestions counted in the system preference MaxOpenSuggestions. It would be nice if this system preference also connected to the staff client, so a purchase suggestion done on the patrons account by staff alerted the staff that the patron already had the maximum number of purchase suggestion allowed. At this time, even if a patron has maxed out the number of open purchase suggestions on the OPAC, a staff member can still enter more purchase suggestions for that patron through the staff client without knowledge of the maxopensuggestions being reached. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 11

[Bug 17173] New: Quick edit a subfield in frameworks
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Mar '25

11 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17173 Bug ID: 17173 Summary: Quick edit a subfield in frameworks Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com There are too many click to jump to the edit form of a specific subfield. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 21827] New: koha-mysql does not recognize non-standard port
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Mar '25

10 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21827 Bug ID: 21827 Summary: koha-mysql does not recognize non-standard port Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Packaging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: mirko(a)abunchofthings.net The koha-mysql script provided with the Debian package currently does not check the <port> element in koha-conf.xml. Consequently, if one uses a non-standard port number for MySQL, koha-mysql cannot connect to the database even though Koha itself can. Teaching koha-mysql how to pass --port to the mysql command would fix it. I note that if/when the patches for bug 11974 make it in, it would be useful to also teach koha-mysql how to pass --socket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 21482] New: Create a "landing page" for ILL
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Mar '25

05 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21482 Bug ID: 21482 Summary: Create a "landing page" for ILL Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: magnus(a)libriotech.no Currently, when you go to the ILL module, the first iew is of all ILL requests. This can be a lot of data, and take several seconds to load, and I doubt a lot of people will want the full list. So maybe we could have some sort of intermediate page with links to selections of request, based on their status, type etc. At it's simplest this could just be a page that displays the contents of a syspref, and that syspref could then be filled with HTML and links to filtered views of ILL requests. If the syspref is empty, the intermediate page could redirect to the full view, as it is today. A more advanced version would have a GUI to configure the links, order them, give them names etc. Thougts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 22320] New: Make ILL comments visible to all staff
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Mar '25

04 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22320 Bug ID: 22320 Summary: Make ILL comments visible to all staff Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: magnus(a)libriotech.no Target Milestone: --- The ILL module has several kinds of comments that are only visible to staff who have access to the ILL module. This is a problem because any librarian can get the question "how is my ILL coming along" from a patron at the front desk. We should make some or all of the comments, and probably also the status, of ILL requests visible to all staff in the normal detail view, so they can answer questions about ILL loans that have not arrived at the library yet. It might be a good idea to have sysprefs to let libraries choose which comments should be visible to "other" staff. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 22435] New: account_offset types should be codes not descriptions
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Mar '25

04 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22435 Bug ID: 22435 Summary: account_offset types should be codes not descriptions Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- Currently, account_offset.types are all descriptive strings.. they should really be 'codes' to distinguish them from user-facing data and discourage developers from adding more untranslatable strings at the database level. I also don't think the current strings make a great deal of sense as they're often not describing an 'offset' action but the account action itself which is already better defined within the accountline.accounttype fields. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 282