March 2020 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 17388] New: Suggestion detail page marks suggestion as rejected and accepted
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Apr '21

06 Apr '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17388 Bug ID: 17388 Summary: Suggestion detail page marks suggestion as rejected and accepted Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: veron(a)veron.ch QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org To reproduce: - Create a suggestion - In suggestions management, mark it ("accidentally") as accepted. - Then change status, e.g. to rejected - Display the suggestion's detail page Result: Weird information on detail page, suggestion appears as rejected and as accepted. See screeshot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 24451] New: Clarify wording when deleting a bib attached to orders
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Apr '21

06 Apr '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24451 Bug ID: 24451 Summary: Clarify wording when deleting a bib attached to orders Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl >From detail.pl, when attempting to delete a bib that is connected to any uncanceled orders in acquisitions, we receive the message: "Warning: This record is used in X order(s). Deleting it could cause serious issues on acquisition module. Are you sure you want to delete this record?" This message would be more helpful if it distinguished between open and closed orders. Deleting a bib connected to an open order will cause serious issues. Deleting a bib connected to closed orders will not. I see three possible fixes: - Change the message to specify "This record is used in X open order(s) and Y closed order(s). Deleting a record used in open orders could cause serious issues ..." - Change the message to only appear if the bib is used in orders connected to an active budget and give a count of only orders connected to an active budget. - Complete bug 16872 to entirely block the deletion of bibs in open orders, then remove this warning. If we're not allowing the deletion of bibs from open orders, then it's not a big deal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 24225] New: Add Koha::Objects->search_from_api method
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Apr '21

05 Apr '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24225 Bug ID: 24225 Summary: Add Koha::Objects->search_from_api method Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Bug 23843 introduced the Koha::Object(s)->to_api method and the attribute mappings on the Koha::Object classes. Bug 23893 will introduce the reverse mapping along with the Koha::Object->new_from_api and Koha::Object->set_from_api methods. So all the pieces are set so we can properly build a Koha::Objects->search_from_api method that does something similar to the objects.search helper, but uses the classes' mappings instead of requiring the to_api and to_model methods to be passed. This will ultimately help clean all the controllers and (hopefully) improve productivity re: adding endpoints, because of the removal of that intrinsic complexity both on controllers, and tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 19207] New: Don't export fields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Apr '21

03 Apr '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19207 Bug ID: 19207 Summary: Don't export fields Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: osimandias(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Created attachment 66613 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=66613&action=ed… srceenshot GUI option In the GUI option "Don't export fields" (of export.pl) is not expressed correctly. It does not exclude the field of the exported records, What it does, is to exclude the records that contain that field. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 16628] New: Patrons requesting modifications link behaves differently on the home page than the members-home.pl page
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Apr '21

02 Apr '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16628 Bug ID: 16628 Summary: Patrons requesting modifications link behaves differently on the home page than the members-home.pl page Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com It would appear that the links do not behave the same between the members-update.pl page and mainpage.pl. When IndependentBranchesPatronModifications is set to Prevent, the link on mainpage.pl shows the count for your library, and only shows when your library has requests. However, the link ALWAYS shows on members-update.pl, and shows the total of all requests. I don't believe any other feature in Koha works this way, and I don't believe this should be the behavior of this feature. In my opinion, the link on mainpage.pl behaves correctly, and the link on members-update.pl should be changed to do the same. Christopher -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 22992] New: When you merge records in a list there is no way to return to the list
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 01 Apr '21

01 Apr '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22992 Bug ID: 22992 Summary: When you merge records in a list there is no way to return to the list Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Lists Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: axel.amghar(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Target Milestone: --- In a list, you can merge records but when you do it, there is no way to return to the list directly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 11

[Bug 18372] New: transits are not created at check in despite user responsing Yes to the prompt
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 31 Mar '21

31 Mar '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18372 Bug ID: 18372 Summary: transits are not created at check in despite user responsing Yes to the prompt Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: colin.campbell(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com When checking in an item from another library the user is prompted whether the item should go into transit if they respond Yes no transit is created and the item status is shown as Available. The changes to the template circ/returns.tt lines 408-412 in bug 15821 appear to be the cause meaning no value is returned as dotransfer to the returns.pl script. Reverting these lines to how they were prior to bug 15821 restores transit behaviour -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 20

[Bug 24085] New: Double submission of forms on returns.pl
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 31 Mar '21

31 Mar '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24085 Bug ID: 24085 Summary: Double submission of forms on returns.pl Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com The .print and .cancel-hold buttons in returns.tt have an event tied to the click, this adjusts some inputs and submits the forms. The buttons themselves are also submit buttons. We should only have one method of submitting the form. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 16

[Bug 15729] New: SIP server allows checkin of reserved item
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Mar '21

30 Mar '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15729 Bug ID: 15729 Summary: SIP server allows checkin of reserved item Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: SIP2 Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: bc(a)interleaf.ie QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: colin.campbell(a)ptfs-europe.com At present the SIP server will allow an item to be returned even if there is an outstanding hold on it. Some libraries do not see this as an issue and run reports for reserves before re-shelving. However, some prefer to have the item denied at the selfservice unit and force the borrower to return the item to the desk. With this in mind there should be a SIP systempreference which allows libraries to specify if a reserved item should be permitted to be checked in via the selfservice unit -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 16

[Bug 22563] New: Convert lost handling to use 'status' instead of two accounttypes
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Mar '21

30 Mar '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22563 Bug ID: 22563 Summary: Convert lost handling to use 'status' instead of two accounttypes Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- Bug 22512 introduces a new field for tracking the 'state' of various accounttypes; We should convert the current lost handling from using `L`,`Rep`,`W` (denoting "Lost", "Replaced" and "Written Off") in combination with `LR` (denoting fine "Lost Returned"). This will clarify the logic and also pave the way to having a more user definable accounttype configuration. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 150