March 2021 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 13580] New: item circ history has 'last seen' labeled wrong
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Feb '26

05 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13580 Bug ID: 13580 Summary: item circ history has 'last seen' labeled wrong Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All URL: cgi-bin/koha/circ/bookcount.pl?&biblionumber=106124&bi =106124&itm=140197 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: nengard(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de, sophie.meynieux(a)biblibre.com CC: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de CC: sophie.meynieux(a)biblibre.com On this page: cgi-bin/koha/circ/bookcount.pl?&biblionumber=106124&bi=106124&itm=140197 the 'last seen' column is actually the timestamp - not the date last seen so it's confusing. The label should be changed or the value should be changed. --- Comment #1 from Owen Leonard <oleonard(a)myacpl.org> --- *** Bug 13581 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** --- Comment #2 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- Hm, it's not quite the timestamp either. It looks like a calculated date on when the item was 'last seen' in this library. It uses the newest date and time from issues, old_issues and branchtransfers. Maybe 'last seen at library'? --- Comment #3 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- Hm, it's not quite the timestamp either. It looks like a calculated date on when the item was 'last seen' in this library. It uses the newest date and time from issues, old_issues and branchtransfers. Maybe 'last seen at library'? --- Comment #4 from Sophie MEYNIEUX <sophie.meynieux(a)biblibre.com> --- The pb with this timestamp is that it is changed by anonymisation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 22762] New: Collection codes not displayed on receiving
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Feb '26

04 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22762 Bug ID: 22762 Summary: Collection codes not displayed on receiving Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- Caused by commit 31c29fd31f557306233e6a2936148a5bb10b89a1 Bug 21206: Replace C4::Items::GetItem The log says: The method Koha::Item->collection is not covered by tests! It has highlighted an older problem: Since commit bb1e9c500c810402c64436c53bcc00ffb9a0b857 Bug 17248 - Koha::AuthorisedValues - Remove GetKohaAuthorisedValueLib the "Collection code" is not filled correctly (items.collection vs items.ccode). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 27834] New: CircControl syspref is used wrong in TooMany function C4::Circulation
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Feb '26

04 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27834 Bug ID: 27834 Summary: CircControl syspref is used wrong in TooMany function C4::Circulation Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: joonas.kylmala(a)helsinki.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com The CircControl syspref description says > Use the checkout and fines rules of > PickupLibrary: the library you are logged in at. > PatronLibrary: the library the patron is from. > ItemHomeLibrary: the library the item is from. This is mostly true but there is one exception in the TooMany function where it actually doesn't just change which libraries rules are used but how the the calculation is performed. With PatronLibrary set the behaviour is as expected by reading the syspref description. However with the setting PickupLibrary the behaviour changes now, instead of just using the rules of the pickup library we also only take into account the loans in the pickup library when calculating whether we are over the checkout limit or not. The same happens with ItemHomeLibrary where we instead calculate the patron's checkouts in the home library of the item being checked out. We should really try to fix this either by a) showing that ItemHomeLibrary and PickupLibrary is unacceptable and no one actually wants that, that would allow then making the behaviour similar as what it is to PatronLibrary (so just selecting the right circ rule instead of changing calculation method). b) Provide a new syspref for changing the calcutation method when PickupLibrary or ItemHomeLibrary CircControl values are used, and set it on upgrade enabled as default. Ps. svc/letters/preview might use CirControl wrongly as well, I'm not 100% I didn't quite understand but as for other usages of CircControl syspref I grepped where it was used and it correctly only changed the circ rules to be used instead of changing behaviour. So in addition to TooMany we might have to do some changes to svc/letters/preview if it turns out it changes behaviour as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 46

[Bug 22436] New: add move or copy control field from or to subfield in MARC modification templates
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Feb '26

03 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22436 Bug ID: 22436 Summary: add move or copy control field from or to subfield in MARC modification templates Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- MARC modification templates does not allow to mix control field and the subfield of a regular field, we should allow that. But of course not the mix of an entire regular field and the subfield of a regular field. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 27704] New: Group locations for advanced search
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27704 Bug ID: 27704 Summary: Group locations for advanced search Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: severine.queune(a)bulac.fr QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Created attachment 116878 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=116878&action=e… Add a goup Locations option - Advanced search.png Like the option exists for itype with ITEMTYPECAT authorized value, it could be useful for users if we would group locations into several categories in OPAC advanced search and facets. For example, we have 29 different storage location only accessible to staff and 4 public locations in our catalog, which are quite confusing descriptions for opac users. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 24082] New: Add a 'refund' option to anonymous payments
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24082 Bug ID: 24082 Summary: Add a 'refund' option to anonymous payments Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org With bug 23442 we add a process for recording refunds to patrons. We need to expand this for anonymous payments once bug 23354 is available. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 53

[Bug 24288] New: Add wording to authorized value interface to indicate valid code length
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Jan '26

30 Jan '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24288 Bug ID: 24288 Summary: Add wording to authorized value interface to indicate valid code length Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Several standard authorized values feed into fields that require a single character code (LOST, NOTFORLOAN, DAMAGED, RESTRICTED, WITHDRAWN). It'd be good to have some wording in the authorized value interface that would indicate this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 29

[Bug 23861] New: Add authorised value categories description option
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Jan '26

30 Jan '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23861 Bug ID: 23861 Summary: Add authorised value categories description option Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com I really like the way the authorised values page looks now. I think it's much more user friendly with the descriptions and the categories all laid out and not in a drop-down. Right now, the descriptions for each category are "hardcoded" in the template. Would it be feasible to move those in the DB? That way, when we add new categories, we would be able to add our own description. For example, if I add a category for RDA media type, I would be able to add a description saying it's meant to be used with 337$a. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 14

[Bug 27512] New: Block creation of invalid authorised values for LOST, NOTFORLOAN, DAMAGED, RESTRICTED, and WITHDRAWN
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Jan '26

30 Jan '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27512 Bug ID: 27512 Summary: Block creation of invalid authorised values for LOST, NOTFORLOAN, DAMAGED, RESTRICTED, and WITHDRAWN Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Several authorised value categories have inherent limits on what values can be used. Bug 24288 adds text to the screen to tell you about these limits, but doesn't enforce them. It'd be good to just stop a user from saving a value that won't work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 20989] New: Hold Notes to be added later
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Jan '26

29 Jan '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20989 Bug ID: 20989 Summary: Hold Notes to be added later Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 17.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: fiona.borthwick(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Currently it is only possible to add a Hold Note at the time of creating the hold. It would be nice if notes could be added at a later stage. A few of our customers have asked for this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 13