March 2021 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 18711] New: No longer possible have a blank value for Classification Sources in the Administration Module
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 01 Sep '25

01 Sep '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18711 Bug ID: 18711 Summary: No longer possible have a blank value for Classification Sources in the Administration Module Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 16.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: karen(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com In Koha 3.22 it was possible to enter a blank value for Classification Sources in the Administration Module. In 16.11 it is no longer possible to enter a blank value. The expected behavior is that it would still be possible to enter a blank value. The SWITCH Library Consortium has requested the ability to keep the ability to add a blank value field. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 25938] New: Identify the renewal type in the renewal after_circ_action hook
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Aug '25

28 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25938 Bug ID: 25938 Summary: Identify the renewal type in the renewal after_circ_action hook Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Plugin architecture Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org It would be nice to be able to distinguish between autorenewal, opac, staff and SIP renewals in the after_circ_action renewal hook. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 17983] New: Add minutes loan to DiscreteCalendar
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Aug '25

28 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17983 Bug ID: 17983 Summary: Add minutes loan to DiscreteCalendar Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Holidays Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: mehdi.hamidi(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Hello everyone, This is an additional feature to our new Discrete Calendar. Theses patches add the possibility to choose the loan unit as minutes in circulations rules. Test plan: - Apply patch of Bugzilla 17015 - Apply this patch. - Run test t/db_dependent/minutes_loan.t - Create new item type for the new rule. - Create circulation rule and fill the fields, make sure the unit is set to : minutes, choose the item type of the one created above.- - Checkout an item that follow the circulation rule and set due date in the past. - Run fines.pl. - Check if the correct amount was calculated. - Note: make sure to factor in the fine grace period if set and the system preference FinesIncludeGracePeriod. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 49

[Bug 24226] New: Advanced editor - drops subfields/punctuation when manually linking authority records
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 27 Aug '25

27 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24226 Bug ID: 24226 Summary: Advanced editor - drops subfields/punctuation when manually linking authority records Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: mkstephens(a)lancasterseminary.edu QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl In the basic editor, it is possible to manually search for an authority record and link to it while preserving the original punctuation in the bibliographic record. It is also possible to search for and link to a broader heading and the additional subfields will remain intact in the bibliographic record. If you try to do either one of these things in the advanced editor using ctrl+shift+L to get to the authority search, once you link to the authority record that you select the MARC field you are editing will be rewritten to match the corresponding field in the authority record. It would be very nice if the advanced cataloging editor would simply append the authid in $9 and leave the rest of the MARC field alone. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 17511] New: Authority linking subfield
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 27 Aug '25

27 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17511 Bug ID: 17511 Summary: Authority linking subfield Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: stefan.berndtsson(a)ub.gu.se QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Currently Koha links authority records and bibliographic records using subfield 9. What is the reason behind this choice? According to the MARC21 specification, subfield 0 is "Authority record control number or standard number", which seems more logical. Usually 9 is a locally defined field, and Libris, the National Union Catalogue in Sweden, uses subfield 9 for various other things already. What would it take to make the linking subfield into a configurable option? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 49

[Bug 26998] New: XSLT: In some cases () are erroneously removed from the link text (773 and others)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 27 Aug '25

27 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26998 Bug ID: 26998 Summary: XSLT: In some cases () are erroneously removed from the link text (773 and others) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Bibliographic data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org In some cases in the XSLT we have a translate function on the link text instead of the link itself (where it's supposed to be used). These cause that () in the text are not displayed and should be removed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 18081] New: New EU General Data Protection Regulation 2018
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 27 Aug '25

27 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18081 Bug ID: 18081 Summary: New EU General Data Protection Regulation 2018 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: new feature Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: black23(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Next year (2018) all EU countries must apply new regulations about data protection. So let's talk how to prepare Koha for this. More about regulation in english: http://www.privacy-regulation.eu/en/index.htm Mailing debate: http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/2016-November/043314.h… Main questions: - how protect private data of borrowers (Qvarn etc.) - how connect people into Koha by secure way (https/SSL, Gloo etc.) - how protect APIs access (better documentation, best practise etc.) - how drive access to private data in system (new set of permissions?) - how to track security accidents and "damage" (more logs and analyse tool?) - how to offer better support for automatic anonymization/delete of non-active borrowes and their data from system - how to declare/certify Koha as system that protect private data and respect EU regulations This topis is very important for all libraries with Koha from EU countries. But data protection and security are universal topics at this time. It can be competetive advantage for Koha too. Mike -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 53

[Bug 27378] New: Enable compliance with EU Cookie Legislation via cookie consent
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 27 Aug '25

27 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27378 Bug ID: 27378 Summary: Enable compliance with EU Cookie Legislation via cookie consent Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: andrew.isherwood(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org This bug proposes to add the ability for a site to comply with EU Cookie Legislation if required, through the use of cookie consent. Cookie use that requires consent involves the use of "non-essential" cookies. For the implementation of this bug, we are considering all cookies set by Koha itself to be "essential", and therefore not requiring consent. "Non-essential" cookies will potentially be anything else, for example, Google Analytics tracking. This bug will provide the following: - Allow an admin to define code that requires consent to run (e.g. code that results in a non-essential cookie being set). Along with a name & description for that code, and the ability to specify whether that code requires consent before running, both in the OPAC and staff interface. - Allow a user to see exactly which cookies (essential & non-essential) may be set and which non-essential cookies they can consent to if they wish. The detail of the cookies in use is definable by a site admin. - Allow a user to consent to any non-essential cookies. - Allow a user to see which non-essential cookies they have consented to and, subsequently, remove consent if they wish. - Prevent the running of any code that causes a non-essential cookie to be set unless the user has explicitly consented to it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 249

[Bug 16157] New: C4::Koha::GetAuthorisedValues should not handle the selected option
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '25

22 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16157 Bug ID: 16157 Summary: C4::Koha::GetAuthorisedValues should not handle the selected option Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org >From C4::Koha::GetAuthorisedValues # TODO: the "selected" feature should be replaced by a utility function # somewhere else, it doesn't belong in here. For starters it makes # caching much more complicated. Or just let the UI logic handle it, it's # what it's for. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 19889] New: localholdspriority needs exclusions
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '25

22 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19889 Bug ID: 19889 Summary: localholdspriority needs exclusions Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com localholdspriority is great, unless you have a unique or rare collection that is popular. If you have such a collection, and ongoing holds are being placed on it to be picked up at several locations, only the patrons at that library will ever get their hands on it unless a patron is smart enough and willing to pickup the item at that location. I would propose an exclusion preference, that would exclude listed patron categories, item types, formats, or specific items. Any other item criteria or factors that I missed could be added to this list. Currently we have patrons at other libraries that will never get the items they have requested. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 137