April 2021 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 27808] New: Item's onloan column remains unset if a checked out item is issued to another patron without being returned first
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Apr '21

14 Apr '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27808 Bug ID: 27808 Summary: Item's onloan column remains unset if a checked out item is issued to another patron without being returned first Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com If any item is currently checked out to a patron, and the item is then checked out directly to another patron without manually checking the item in first, the items.onloan column will remain NULL. This will only happen if the new checkout will be due the same day as the previous checked. This is caused by the item being returned without updating the item object from storage afterward. Even though AddIssue will call AddReturn which sets the value of onloan to NULL in the database, we are not passing in the item object by reference, so it's onloan value remains set to a date. Then we set the onloan value to the same date. Because the value does not change in the object, the column does not get marked dirty. We could update the object from storage first, but it seems more efficient to mark the column as dirty manually to avoid that otherwise unnecessary fetch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 37

[Bug 28137] New: Lost items checked in through inventory do not follow "refund on return" policy in circ rules
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Apr '21

14 Apr '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28137 Bug ID: 28137 Summary: Lost items checked in through inventory do not follow "refund on return" policy in circ rules Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 20.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: bwsdonna(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com When an item that is marked as lost and is checked out on a patron's account is checked in through the inventory function, the Default lost item fee refund on return policy is not followed. To recreate: 1. Set Default lost item fee refund on return policy to YES 2. Check out an item to patron 3. Mark it lost and see that the fee has been charged, and item is still checked out to the patron 4. Put that barcode through the Inventory process, making sure checked out items are set to be returned 5. Note that the item is checked in, but patron does not get lost item fee returned. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 8712] We should use WAI-ARIA guidelines to help with accessibility -OMNIBUS bug
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Apr '21

14 Apr '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8712 Henry Bolshaw <bolshawh(a)parliament.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |accessibility -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14957] Write protecting MARC fields based on source of import
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Apr '21

14 Apr '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14957 --- Comment #270 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- If yo can, please have a look here - we are getting close to the critical timeframe before release and it would be so great to have this included. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 28063] New: Minor change to OpacAuthorities description
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Apr '21

14 Apr '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28063 Bug ID: 28063 Summary: Minor change to OpacAuthorities description Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: r.delahunty(a)arts.ac.uk QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Selecting Do not allow for the system preference OpacAuthorities does hide the Authority Search tab on the Simple Search page but authority searches remain possible on the Advanced Search page by selecting More options to expose Subject and Author searches. The description of the system preference should explain that the change to the preference affects the Simple Search page only. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 27573] New: Use of NOW() in SQL should be avoided
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Apr '21

14 Apr '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27573 Bug ID: 27573 Summary: Use of NOW() in SQL should be avoided Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org A few uses of the SQL NOW() function have crept in.. if we want to have consistent dates using the timezone set in the config then we need to handle date parsing before we hit the database as the DB timezone may differ from the instance timezone. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 13849] Introduce acceptance tests with cucumber
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Apr '21

14 Apr '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13849 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-c |chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz |ommunity.org | --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> --- It's no longer relevant (to me). The idea was to let anybody write tests, even without technical skills. Another goal was automatically generate (internationalized) screenshots for the manual https://lists.katipo.co.nz/pipermail/koha/2018-January/049807.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14233] Add logging support to notices and slips management
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Apr '21

14 Apr '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14233 --- Comment #116 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> --- Follow-up pushed to master. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 13849] Introduce acceptance tests with cucumber
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Apr '21

14 Apr '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13849 David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcook(a)prosentient.com.au --- Comment #12 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- I don't see any obvious advantage to including Cucumber tests but happy to be convinced otherwise. Is the idea that the test reports are prettier and the scenarios more verbose? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 27993] New: Koha::Item::Transfer->in_transit should not count cancelled transfers
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Apr '21

13 Apr '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27993 Bug ID: 27993 Summary: Koha::Item::Transfer->in_transit should not count cancelled transfers Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Depends on: 26481 Petro Vashchuk has identified a bug in the in_transit method. We should also filter out cancelled transfers. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26481 [Bug 26481] Add Koha::Item::Transfer->in_transit method -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 24