September 2021 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 21827] New: koha-mysql does not recognize non-standard port
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Mar '25

10 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21827 Bug ID: 21827 Summary: koha-mysql does not recognize non-standard port Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Packaging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: mirko(a)abunchofthings.net The koha-mysql script provided with the Debian package currently does not check the <port> element in koha-conf.xml. Consequently, if one uses a non-standard port number for MySQL, koha-mysql cannot connect to the database even though Koha itself can. Teaching koha-mysql how to pass --port to the mysql command would fix it. I note that if/when the patches for bug 11974 make it in, it would be useful to also teach koha-mysql how to pass --socket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 23141] New: The Debian scripts do not use the myql portnumber
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Mar '25

10 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23141 Bug ID: 23141 Summary: The Debian scripts do not use the myql portnumber Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Packaging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andreas.jonsson(a)kreablo.se QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: mirko(a)abunchofthings.net Target Milestone: --- The scripts koha-mysql, koha-mysqldump, and koha-create and possibly others do not use the configured mysql portnumber configured in koha-conf.xml. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 38

[Bug 28410] New: Reduce memory footprint
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Mar '25

10 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28410 Bug ID: 28410 Summary: Reduce memory footprint Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Mostly because of our circular dependencies we are facing memory issue. Like any simple scripts will have to load all the modules. We should focus on reducing the memory footprint. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 45

[Bug 28551] New: Add ability to limit gather_print_notices by patron category
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Mar '25

07 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28551 Bug ID: 28551 Summary: Add ability to limit gather_print_notices by patron category Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org It would be great if gather_print_notices could be run with a list of patron categories to include/exclude. I'm imagining one new flag for an allowlist and another new flag for a deny list. The use case at hand is a library that wants to mail printed Hold Available notices to some but not all patrons. HOLD notices generate as print by default, so there's no way to simply turn them off for patrons in the category that should not receive them. A new flag in the gather_print cron would allow us to at least stop emailing them to the library along with the HOLD notices they do want. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 27618] New: Don't show dropdown if PatronSelfRegistrationLibraryList only has one library
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Mar '25

06 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27618 Bug ID: 27618 Summary: Don't show dropdown if PatronSelfRegistrationLibraryList only has one library Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Keywords: Academy Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: magnus(a)libriotech.no QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 16274 If PatronSelfRegistrationLibraryList only has one library code in it, that one library is still shown as a dropdown with one choice. It would be better if the code was in a "hidden" form input and the "Home library" was just shown as text, or not shown at all. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16274 [Bug 16274] Make the selfregistration branchcode selection configurable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 16

[Bug 21482] New: Create a "landing page" for ILL
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Mar '25

06 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21482 Bug ID: 21482 Summary: Create a "landing page" for ILL Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: magnus(a)libriotech.no Currently, when you go to the ILL module, the first iew is of all ILL requests. This can be a lot of data, and take several seconds to load, and I doubt a lot of people will want the full list. So maybe we could have some sort of intermediate page with links to selections of request, based on their status, type etc. At it's simplest this could just be a page that displays the contents of a syspref, and that syspref could then be filled with HTML and links to filtered views of ILL requests. If the syspref is empty, the intermediate page could redirect to the full view, as it is today. A more advanced version would have a GUI to configure the links, order them, give them names etc. Thougts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 28781] New: Elasticsearch facets may be inaccurate
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Mar '25

05 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28781 Bug ID: 28781 Summary: Elasticsearch facets may be inaccurate Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com To recreate: 1 - Set system preferences: SearchEngine: Elasticsearch FacetMaxCount: 20 displayFacetCount: Show 2 - Using koha testing docker default data search for '*' 3 - Note the author facets like Beckett, Samuel (5) Aristophanes (3) De Niese, Danielle (3) Euripides (3) Aristotle (2) 4 - Set FacetMaxCount:400 5 - Repeat search 6 - Note facets like: Beckett, Samuel (5) Stevens, W. Richard (5) Plato (4) Aristophanes (3) De Niese, Danielle (3) 7 - Some top terms are missing when FacetMaxCount is passed to ES as 'size' >From the docs: The size parameter can be set to define how many term buckets should be returned out of the overall terms list. By default, the node coordinating the search process will request each shard to provide its own top size term buckets and once all shards respond, it will reduce the results to the final list that will then be returned to the client. This means that if the number of unique terms is greater than size, the returned list is slightly off and not accurate (it could be that the term counts are slightly off and it could even be that a term that should have been in the top size buckets was not returned). https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/6.8/search-aggregat… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 22320] New: Make ILL comments visible to all staff
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Mar '25

04 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22320 Bug ID: 22320 Summary: Make ILL comments visible to all staff Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: magnus(a)libriotech.no Target Milestone: --- The ILL module has several kinds of comments that are only visible to staff who have access to the ILL module. This is a problem because any librarian can get the question "how is my ILL coming along" from a patron at the front desk. We should make some or all of the comments, and probably also the status, of ILL requests visible to all staff in the normal detail view, so they can answer questions about ILL loans that have not arrived at the library yet. It might be a good idea to have sysprefs to let libraries choose which comments should be visible to "other" staff. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 27049] New: It would be helpful to have a bulk waive of debts tool
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Mar '25

04 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27049 Bug ID: 27049 Summary: It would be helpful to have a bulk waive of debts tool Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Command-line Utilities Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: robin(a)catalyst.net.nz With extended periods of libraries being closed and the recent complexities introduced into the accounts system for properly tracking accountline writeoffs, it would be helpful to have a command line too allowing administrators to writeoff accounts in bulk using the proper routines within Koha to properly record the action. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 50

[Bug 22435] New: account_offset types should be codes not descriptions
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Mar '25

04 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22435 Bug ID: 22435 Summary: account_offset types should be codes not descriptions Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- Currently, account_offset.types are all descriptive strings.. they should really be 'codes' to distinguish them from user-facing data and discourage developers from adding more untranslatable strings at the database level. I also don't think the current strings make a great deal of sense as they're often not describing an 'offset' action but the account action itself which is already better defined within the accountline.accounttype fields. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 282