November 2022 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 32351] New: Fix TestBuilder calls in Koha/Holds.t
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Dec '22

02 Dec '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32351 Bug ID: 32351 Summary: Fix TestBuilder calls in Koha/Holds.t Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org See 32350. Follow-up. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 44

[Bug 32369] New: Two Factor Authentication Can Be Bypassed If Catalog and Staff Client URL Aren't Properly Configured
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 01 Dec '22

01 Dec '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32369 Bug ID: 32369 Summary: Two Factor Authentication Can Be Bypassed If Catalog and Staff Client URL Aren't Properly Configured Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 22.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Authentication Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cslone(a)camdencountylibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: dpavlin(a)rot13.org Ideally, there aren't any publicly accessible, production sites set up in the way described below, however there is a bypass of 2FA if there are (though this would still require a compromised PIN). I have a test environment of Koha on a local-network server. When I first set it up, I made the staff client address the IP of the server, and the OPAC the same IP at a specific port (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8081). I've never gotten around to correcting that, and consequently when I'm logged into the staff client it also considers me to be logged in to the OPAC, and visa versa (at that point I can go to either the IP or the IP+Port to go between them). I set up two factor authentication on a staff account, which is working correctly when I log into the staff client. As expected, when I log into the OPAC there's no 2FA code requested, however I can then just go to the base IP (the staff client) and I will be logged into the staff client without having to deal with 2FA. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 28756] New: Select values by exclusion in facets
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 01 Dec '22

01 Dec '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28756 Bug ID: 28756 Summary: Select values by exclusion in facets Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: mathsabypro(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Hi It is not possible to use facets for excluding a value. It could be a nice enhancement (for ES and Zebra configuration). use case : after a search we want to exclude documents in english -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 32350] New: Should we die if TestBuilder is passed a column we're not expecting
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 01 Dec '22

01 Dec '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32350 Bug ID: 32350 Summary: Should we die if TestBuilder is passed a column we're not expecting Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 52

[Bug 30359] New: GetBudgetHierarchy is slow on order receive page
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 01 Dec '22

01 Dec '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30359 Bug ID: 30359 Summary: GetBudgetHierarchy is slow on order receive page Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: johanna.raisa(a)koha-suomi.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org GetBudgetHierarchy is called when opening orderreceive.pl and if there are lot of budgets the page takes lot of time to open. On our biggest groups it takes almost 2 minute, which is a lifetime on internet. Seems that the problem is calculating the totals, which are done with separate queries to the database. On the order receive page it is not needed since it is using only the budget_id, budget_amount and budget_name parameters. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 20

[Bug 12580] DataTables overflow their container elements
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Nov '22

30 Nov '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12580 --- Comment #8 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #7) > (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #6) > > I'd love to see us have another go at this.. perhaps a 23.05 cycle target? > > This DataTables extension might be useful for this as well: > https://datatables.net/extensions/responsive/examples/column-control/auto. > html > > I know I've commented elsewhere about it but can't remember where now. Turns out it was on the listserv and not on Bugzilla: https://www.mail-archive.com/koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org/msg12844.h… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 12580] DataTables overflow their container elements
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Nov '22

30 Nov '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12580 --- Comment #7 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #6) > I'd love to see us have another go at this.. perhaps a 23.05 cycle target? This DataTables extension might be useful for this as well: https://datatables.net/extensions/responsive/examples/column-control/auto.h… I know I've commented elsewhere about it but can't remember where now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11846] Correct database update for debarments with 9999-12-31
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Nov '22

30 Nov '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11846 Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrewfh(a)dubcolib.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |32383 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32383 [Bug 32383] Indefinite debarments should not be recorded with an expiration date of '9999-12-31' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14911] Item search: Display additional 245 subfields in search results
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Nov '22

30 Nov '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14911 Lucas Gass <lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 7012] Limit to available does not exclude in-transit items
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Nov '22

30 Nov '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7012 --- Comment #10 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- you could change to "Seeking cosponsors" if you wanted - also people from bug 5463 could be interested. It's mostly the same issue. Hm, actually it depends. transfers can also be in branchtransfers... so maybe we'd need both info from reserves and branchtransfers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0