May 2022 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 17643] New: The bug 3333 breaks intranet search results in column Location
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 May '25

12 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17643 Bug ID: 17643 Summary: The bug 3333 breaks intranet search results in column Location Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: christophe.croullebois(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The Bug 3333 corrects in Opac by setting notforloan=1. But it has a side effect on intranet search result page due to the use of authorized value on 'notforloan'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 11

[Bug 30723] New: Allow for notices to have custom header/footer includes
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 May '25

09 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30723 Bug ID: 30723 Summary: Allow for notices to have custom header/footer includes Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Some libraries like to add the same custom header/footer to many notices/slips. It would be handy if there was a way to set a custom header/footer and then call on it in each notice/slip where you'd like to have them. That way you would not have to add the same header/footer content to each notice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 14

[Bug 27730] New: Innocent changes to framework silently delete bibliographic data
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 May '25

09 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27730 Bug ID: 27730 Summary: Innocent changes to framework silently delete bibliographic data Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 19.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: ian.bays(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl If you copy and change a framework and either delete a subfield in the new framework or mark the subfield tab as "ignore", then any bib data with data in that subfield, when saved in the new framework will be silently destroyed with no option to undo. Test Plan to confirm behaviour: 1. Create bib record in default framework with minimal data, but add tag 365 (as it has a number of subfields all visible) and populate subfields a through h with "fa" through "fh". Save the record and with sql check the contents of the metadata. (I found this SQL gives enough information substituting the correct bib number of the saved record: select tagfield, tagsubfield, frameworkcode, tab, hidden, (select ExtractValue(metadata, '//datafield[@tag="365"]/subfield[@code>="a"]') from biblio_metadata where biblionumber = 37002 and (select frameworkcode from biblio where biblionumber = 37002) = marc_subfield_structure.frameworkcode) tv from marc_subfield_structure where frameworkcode in ('', 'TEST') and tagfield = '365'; ) 2. Copy the default framework to a TEST framework and set (say 365$b to tab ignore and delete 365$d). (I used export the default framework to a csv, create new TEST framework and import from the saved default csv) 3. Edit the bib record and change framework to TEST framework (settings > change framework) and save the record. 4. Run the SQL again and observe the data from subfields b and d have both disappeared from the metadata. If you were to rerun these tests you may need to reload memcache to ensure the newly changed frameworks are picked up. I understand it has been broadly known by some long-term Koha users that deleting a subfield from the framework has this effect, but both these situations potentially cause bib data to be silently and permanently delated from the database. Many users will be unaware and may not discover the problem for some time. Potential solutions might include: a) For subfields not in the framework or with tab "ignore" allow the data to be saved as is on saving for edit; b) When selecting "change framework" detect if data would be lost and alert the user with an option to back out of the change without losing data; c) Do not allow deletion of a subfield from a framework and do not allow the "ignore" option for the tab. If a field is to be ignored but hidden there are plenty of visibility options in the framework. NB: The current delivered default framework has 13 subfields set to the "ignore" tab. I cannot see what purpose these serve as no data can survive within them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 17

[Bug 26500] New: Automatic renewals show incorrect count of renewals allowed when CircControl is set to "the library you're logged in at"
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 08 May '25

08 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26500 Bug ID: 26500 Summary: Automatic renewals show incorrect count of renewals allowed when CircControl is set to "the library you're logged in at" Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com When CircControl is set to "the library you're logged in at," the Renew column in the patron checkouts table will show the count of permitted renewals based on the library you're logged in at. This is correct for manual renewals, since those are the rules that will be enforced. However, for automatic renewals this can mean we're showing the user an incorrect number. To recreate: - Create an All Libraries rule that allows 10 renewals - Create a rule for branch A that allows 1 renewal - Creare a rule for branch B that allows 99 renewals - Check an item out from Branch A, set to auto-renew - While logged in as Branch A, confirm Koha tells you you have 1 renewal available - Log in as Branch B, see you have 99 renewals - Log in as Branch C, see you have 10 renewals - Set No Renewal Before to allow renewal immediately - run the auto_renew cron, item renews once - run the auto-renew cron again, confirm too_many error because only 1 renewal is allowed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 18315] New: authentication and authorization refactoring
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 May '25

07 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18315 Bug ID: 18315 Summary: authentication and authorization refactoring Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Authentication Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: oha(a)oha.it QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: dpavlin(a)rot13.org Currently, C4::Auth is responsible to do session management, authentication and authorization. There is no clear separations between them, and the authentication is not modular, making it increasingly harder to maintain and/or introduce no authentication integrations. I was experimenting on this for a while, and I managed to put together few commits in a branch. It started as a proposal, but turned out to be working in _most_ of my tests. here more details: I completely removed any need for CGI and CGI::Session while maintaining a fork-exec aproach to the scripts. (This made it easier to implement Koha::Middleware::Session, Koha::Session::DB and ::KohaCache) Koha::Middleware::Session inject a session object in the Plack request, and invoke Koha::Auth if any authentication tokens are available. Koha::Auth has a list of modules which will be invoked in turn and could be enabled/disabled plack.psgi is changed as well, it has enabled the new Middleware and the applications used are no longer Plack::App::CGIBin but Koha::Middleware::App. here few of the things i want to do to simplify the interaction with the current "legacy" code: I didn't change the scripts or any other module at all, instead I tried to hijack C4::Auth methods to rely on Koha::Session and Koha::Auth. This make it simple to switch back to the previous plack.psgi OR using apache and the normal cgi-bin. authentication should happen upfront, before the script is even started. script will have to verify authorization. authentication MUST be modular, possibly having different systems cooperate. (Some serious discussions must be around this point, especially about accounting and authority) what needs to be done: permissions should be reintroduced. right now permissions are read for the user and set in the template, but no checks are perform on requests. (should be fairly simple to do) reintroduce the code related to shib, cas and any other. more testing, especially for the installer (there is lots of code regarding the web installer which isn't there anymore) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 17

[Bug 28760] New: Granular restrictions
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 May '25

05 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28760 Bug ID: 28760 Summary: Granular restrictions Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com It would be great if restrictions has more options. It would be great if we could restrict specific item checkouts or holds on a patron, if needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 18298] New: Enforce password complexity
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 May '25

05 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18298 Bug ID: 18298 Summary: Enforce password complexity Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Some libraries would want to add the option to Koha to enforce a strong password policy. That policy would mean that passwords should include both upper and lower case characters one or more numbers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 91

[Bug 17406] New: Simplify pay.pl interface - pt.1
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 May '25

02 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17406 Bug ID: 17406 Summary: Simplify pay.pl interface - pt.1 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com I think we can simplify the payment screen. 1) Remove the Pay Amount button. By default, all items are selected, so the Pay selected will do the job. 2) Remove the cancel link. A) It's a link, not a button. B) All it does is change tabs. There isn't anything to really cancel. Changing tabs or navigating elsewhere does the same thing. 3) Remove Write off all button and replace with Write off selected button. 4) Remove the individual Pay and Write off buttons. They are redundant. #4 is my opinion, but they really convolute the flow. The checkboxes and two buttons are sufficient and straight forward. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 18

[Bug 19442] New: add patron attributes into the patron card creator
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 01 May '25

01 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19442 Bug ID: 19442 Summary: add patron attributes into the patron card creator Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Work to be done: 1 - Add the ability to define fields as attribute.CODE in the card creator template 2 - When these codes are found replace them with the correct value for the patron -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 18292] New: t/db_dependent/Circulation.t Dubious, test returned 1 even if test ok
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 01 May '25

01 May '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18292 Bug ID: 18292 Summary: t/db_dependent/Circulation.t Dubious, test returned 1 even if test ok Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: olli-antti.kivilahti(a)jns.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 40