January 2023 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 28833] New: Speed up holds queue builder via parallel processing
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Feb '26

06 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28833 Bug ID: 28833 Summary: Speed up holds queue builder via parallel processing Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com The holds queue builder can take a very long time to run on systems with many holds. For example, a partner with 124,784 unfilled ( not found ) holds, is taking about 64 minutes to run. If we run that same number of holds in 5 parallel chunks ( splitting the number of records as evenly as possible, but *not* taking into account the holds per bib ), it takes 21.5 minutes. If we use 10 loops, it takes less then 14 minutes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 50

[Bug 20053] New: Drop type attribute "text/javascript" used in OPAC template
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Feb '26

06 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20053 Bug ID: 20053 Summary: Drop type attribute "text/javascript" used in OPAC template Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: indradg(a)l2c2.co.in QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If you run the Koha OPAC pages through the W3C validator it generates warnings about type attribute "text/javascript", since W3C now officially describes this as obsolete in HTML5 but still conforming to the standard with warnings [1] Since we are already pumping up HTML5 with <!DOCTYPE html>, I was thinking if we should consider an omnibus update to the following 47 templates so affected. The 47 templates: includes/calendar.inc includes/columns_settings.inc includes/datatables.inc includes/doc-head-close.inc includes/greybox.inc includes/opac-bottom.inc includes/password_check.inc includes/slip-print.inc modules/clubs/clubs-tab.tt modules/clubs/enroll.tt modules/opac-account.tt modules/opac-advsearch.tt modules/opac-auth-detail.tt modules/opac-auth-MARCdetail.tt modules/opac-auth.tt modules/opac-basket.tt modules/opac-course-details.tt modules/opac-course-reserves.tt modules/opac-detail.tt modules/opac-downloadshelf.tt modules/opac-full-serial-issues.tt modules/opac-idref.tt modules/opac-illrequests.tt modules/opac-imageviewer.tt modules/opac-MARCdetail.tt modules/opac-memberentry.tt modules/opac-messaging.tt modules/opac-overdrive-search.tt modules/opac-passwd.tt modules/opac-password-recovery.tt modules/opac-readingrecord.tt modules/opac-request-article.tt modules/opac-reserve.tt modules/opac-results-grouped.tt modules/opac-results.tt modules/opac-review.tt modules/opac-search-history.tt modules/opac-shareshelf.tt modules/opac-shelves.tt modules/opac-showreviews.tt modules/opac-suggestions.tt modules/opac-tags.tt modules/opac-topissues.tt modules/opac-user.tt modules/sco/help.tt modules/sco/printslip.tt modules/sco/sco-main.tt Reference: [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-html52-20171214/obsolete.html#warnings-for-o… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 37

[Bug 13580] New: item circ history has 'last seen' labeled wrong
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Feb '26

05 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13580 Bug ID: 13580 Summary: item circ history has 'last seen' labeled wrong Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All URL: cgi-bin/koha/circ/bookcount.pl?&biblionumber=106124&bi =106124&itm=140197 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: nengard(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de, sophie.meynieux(a)biblibre.com CC: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de CC: sophie.meynieux(a)biblibre.com On this page: cgi-bin/koha/circ/bookcount.pl?&biblionumber=106124&bi=106124&itm=140197 the 'last seen' column is actually the timestamp - not the date last seen so it's confusing. The label should be changed or the value should be changed. --- Comment #1 from Owen Leonard <oleonard(a)myacpl.org> --- *** Bug 13581 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** --- Comment #2 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- Hm, it's not quite the timestamp either. It looks like a calculated date on when the item was 'last seen' in this library. It uses the newest date and time from issues, old_issues and branchtransfers. Maybe 'last seen at library'? --- Comment #3 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> --- Hm, it's not quite the timestamp either. It looks like a calculated date on when the item was 'last seen' in this library. It uses the newest date and time from issues, old_issues and branchtransfers. Maybe 'last seen at library'? --- Comment #4 from Sophie MEYNIEUX <sophie.meynieux(a)biblibre.com> --- The pb with this timestamp is that it is changed by anonymisation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 22762] New: Collection codes not displayed on receiving
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Feb '26

04 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22762 Bug ID: 22762 Summary: Collection codes not displayed on receiving Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- Caused by commit 31c29fd31f557306233e6a2936148a5bb10b89a1 Bug 21206: Replace C4::Items::GetItem The log says: The method Koha::Item->collection is not covered by tests! It has highlighted an older problem: Since commit bb1e9c500c810402c64436c53bcc00ffb9a0b857 Bug 17248 - Koha::AuthorisedValues - Remove GetKohaAuthorisedValueLib the "Collection code" is not filled correctly (items.collection vs items.ccode). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 22436] New: add move or copy control field from or to subfield in MARC modification templates
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Feb '26

03 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22436 Bug ID: 22436 Summary: add move or copy control field from or to subfield in MARC modification templates Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- MARC modification templates does not allow to mix control field and the subfield of a regular field, we should allow that. But of course not the mix of an entire regular field and the subfield of a regular field. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 31612] New: koha-z3950-responder breaks if it's run in a Koha that was created before bug 28364 was applied
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Feb '26

03 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31612 Bug ID: 31612 Summary: koha-z3950-responder breaks if it's run in a Koha that was created before bug 28364 was applied Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Z39.50 / SRU / OpenSearch Servers Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl The problem is the same as Bug 28364 but that it affects upgraded Koha instances rather than new Koha instances. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 11

[Bug 27704] New: Group locations for advanced search
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27704 Bug ID: 27704 Summary: Group locations for advanced search Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: severine.queune(a)bulac.fr QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Created attachment 116878 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=116878&action=e… Add a goup Locations option - Advanced search.png Like the option exists for itype with ITEMTYPECAT authorized value, it could be useful for users if we would group locations into several categories in OPAC advanced search and facets. For example, we have 29 different storage location only accessible to staff and 4 public locations in our catalog, which are quite confusing descriptions for opac users. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 24082] New: Add a 'refund' option to anonymous payments
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24082 Bug ID: 24082 Summary: Add a 'refund' option to anonymous payments Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org With bug 23442 we add a process for recording refunds to patrons. We need to expand this for anonymous payments once bug 23354 is available. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 53

[Bug 31503] New: Groundwork for 20380 (mail consent)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31503 Bug ID: 31503 Summary: Groundwork for 20380 (mail consent) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 170

[Bug 31533] New: Add opt-in/opt-out flags to patron consents
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31533 Bug ID: 31533 Summary: Add opt-in/opt-out flags to patron consents Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Part of the 20380 set. Building on top of 31503. While we now only enforce the GDPR consent if the pref is set to Enforced, we leave other consents empty. Which actually is opt-in. They need to go to the consents page and enable the specific consent. If we would add opt-out, we can either add consents for all users or make PatronConsent a bit smarter and only register refusal (opt-out). It feels more consistent to add all consents to the table, and add them too in the self reg process. But when you add a new consent type and mark it as opt-out, we should then populate the table too. Do we also need a Mandatory flag? Historically, we treat the GDPR consent as such. Other consents may not be of that same category. But we might want the user to make an explicit choice there without the same exceptional approach that we use for GDPR. How do we get him on that page? If he arrives there, we can obviously allow saving only when those mandatories are filled.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4