February 2023 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 24401] New: REST API: Check-in
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '26

07 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24401 Bug ID: 24401 Summary: REST API: Check-in Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: new feature Priority: P5 - low Component: REST API Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lari.taskula(a)hypernova.fi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 124

[Bug 22972] New: Proposal for enriching the bibliographic records with standard identifiers from authority data
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '26

07 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22972 Bug ID: 22972 Summary: Proposal for enriching the bibliographic records with standard identifiers from authority data Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Bibliographic data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: januszop(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- Thinking in terms of linked data, it would be of profit to have as much of standard identifiers in the bibliographic data produced by the library as possible. Libraries use authority data coming from official sources (like LoC, SUDOC, etc.) or enrich their locally created authority records with standard identifiers (e.g. viafId, ISNI, Wikipedia). This information is linked to the bibliographic record by the Koha-specific subfield $9 which is illegal in terms of MARC 21 and does not mean anything outside of the local Koha ecosystem. A record moved out of a local Koha catalogue (downloaded, exported) loses the linked-data connection to other objects (like authors, subjects etc.), which are then identified only by strings. To make this connection between bibliographic access point and objects identified by universal identifiers more permanent outside of the local environment, the standard MARC 21 $0 subfield could be used. (UNIMARC has to be examined - $3 subfield?) The required changes would include at least: C4::AuthoritiesMarc::merge function, the authority plugin, some new system preferences, optionally display templates and also a script to update the existing biblio records. New possible system preferences needed: - switch the feature on/off - source of the standard IDs (possibly different for different biblio fields?) (standard in MARC 21 authority: 024, but may be also 010/035) (a list) - how many ids should be copied (= how may $0 added): only the first found or all of them - if an extra link/icon should be generated in display (OPAC / librarian) Please, share your comments about this idea. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 45

[Bug 28633] New: Add a preferred_name field and an effective_name method to patrons
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '26

07 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28633 Bug ID: 28633 Summary: Add a preferred_name field and an effective_name method to patrons Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Some institutions store legal names in their directories and for patron imports, but would also like to be able to record 'preferred' names in the patro records. It would be nice to have a field for preferred_name and a method to select the preferred name when it exists, and the firstname when it doesn't Following the item we would suggest 'effective_name' - the additional method can be used in patron-title.inc and in notices to simplify name choice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 195

[Bug 24782] New: Calendar edit only applies to first day
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Sep '26

07 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24782 Bug ID: 24782 Summary: Calendar edit only applies to first day Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: emmi.takkinen(a)outlook.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When editing holidays edit only applies to first day (from date). To test: 1. Add holidays on range e.g from 04/03 to 06/03 2. Try edit these holidays so that from date is 04/03 and to date is set to 06/03 3. Save => Only 04/03 is changed There should be option to edit holidays on range. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 28740] New: Delete old ILL requests with cleanup_database
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Sep '26

06 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28740 Bug ID: 28740 Summary: Delete old ILL requests with cleanup_database Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Command-line Utilities Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: robin(a)catalyst.net.nz, tomascohen(a)gmail.com We should teach cleanup_database to delete old ILL requests after a given period. Over in bug 23391, we introduced a syspref in which one can define statuses for which to hide ILL requests. Following that same idea of allowing whatever statuses a given back-end may use, the cron should take a number of days and a status and delete any request with that status that is more than that many days old. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 21

[Bug 23649] New: Elasticsearch offer an option to weight search results by type
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Sep '26

04 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23649 Bug ID: 23649 Summary: Elasticsearch offer an option to weight search results by type Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com Some libraries would like to be able to prioritize "books" over "large print" , audios, etc in the search results -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 46

[Bug 16207] New: Incorporate circulation and fine rules for library groups
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16207 Bug ID: 16207 Summary: Incorporate circulation and fine rules for library groups Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com I think we could simplify circulation and fine rules by incorporating library groups into the mix. For example, I have 27 libraries, and 8 of them follow the same set of rules that are different from the defaults. So, what if instead of cloning these special rules to 8 different libraries (and who knows how many other duplicated sets of rules there are), we defined a set of rules for a library group. If the library is part of that group, it goes by those rules. I don't know if we want to use the same library groups that are already defined in the libraries and groups, or if we want to create a unique Circ rule group. Because, there is always the chance that one or more of the libraries in the 8 that are grouped together by affiliation or region could have a slightly different set of rules. However, I think rules by groups would make managing rules far less complicated than managing groups of cloned rules. Christopher -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 31963] New: Only show reserve fee message on OPAC if they will actually be charged
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31963 Bug ID: 31963 Summary: Only show reserve fee message on OPAC if they will actually be charged Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 22.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: aleisha(a)catalyst.net.nz QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Hold fees can be set at the patron-category level, and if a patron who could be charged a reserve fee logs into the OPAC and tries the place a hold, a message about being charged a hold fee will show. This message does not take HoldFeeMode into consideration. When HoldFeeMode is set to "any time a reserve is collected" the message will be "You will be charged a hold fee of $X when you collect this item", but if HoldFeeMode is set to anything else, the message will be what we are seeing "You will be charged a hold fee of $X for placing this hold". This message can be a bit unexpected, especially if HoldFeeMode is set so hold fees should only be charged if all items are checked out and the record has at least one hold already. We don't expect we should see the message if there are items available and no holds on the record, when HoldFeeMode is set this way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 23

[Bug 27428] New: Show the number of records in the bibliographic record detail page with ElasticSearch.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27428 Bug ID: 27428 Summary: Show the number of records in the bibliographic record detail page with ElasticSearch. Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: ivan.dziuba(a)inlibro.com This preference only for OPAC to show the number of records next to search links in the bibliographic record detail page. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 107

[Bug 25870] New: Add a q_ccl query parameter to /biblios
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25870 Bug ID: 25870 Summary: Add a q_ccl query parameter to /biblios Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: REST API Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com It would be great if we could just pass a CCL query to the /biblios route -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 90