August 2023 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 34578] New: Check-in table should have a column to display hold status
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jun '26

03 Jun '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34578 Bug ID: 34578 Summary: Check-in table should have a column to display hold status Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 22.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: esther.melander(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com It would be nice if the checked in table on the check-in screen would include a column displaying holds status. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 34506] New: After deleting record from a search result the link 'Go back to the results' has disappeared
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jun '26

03 Jun '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34506 Bug ID: 34506 Summary: After deleting record from a search result the link 'Go back to the results' has disappeared Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 22.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff interface Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: koha(a)trust-box.at QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com As was implemented in https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5428 the link 'Go back to the results' seems to have disappeared to test: 1. make a search in the staff interface eg "perl" 2. chose a record 3. delete it (maybe including items) 4. in 21.05 there was a link 'Go back to the results', which is no present in 21.11.06 thx mark -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 33775] New: Different/no results between Check Out and Search Patron when searching for names with spaces
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jun '26

03 Jun '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33775 Bug ID: 33775 Summary: Different/no results between Check Out and Search Patron when searching for names with spaces Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 22.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: bwsdonna(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com For the patron first name Jane surname Van Allen - in Check out, entering Van Allen will bring up the patron record, entering Van Allen in the Search Patron brings no results. The search needs to be the same in both. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 34664] New: Notes added to fund not visible unless editing that fund
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jun '26

03 Jun '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34664 Bug ID: 34664 Summary: Notes added to fund not visible unless editing that fund Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 22.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: heather(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Notes added to a fund in acquisitions are not currently visible unless the edit option is selected again for that particular fund. Budget_notes don't seem to appear anywhere in the codebase, except on aqbudgets.tt when editing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 34483] New: [Omnibus] Standardize fund pull downs
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jun '26

03 Jun '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34483 Bug ID: 34483 Summary: [Omnibus] Standardize fund pull downs Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 22.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We have a very nice fund pull down on the order receive page. * shows the budget * makes hierarchies visible * shows inactive on demand * always shows currently selected to prevent data loss * ordered alphabetically within budgets/hierarchies * select2 for easy selecting We should really have a nice fund list like this everywhere in Koha. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 34151] New: Hard due date being ignored in circulation rules in favor of loan period
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jun '26

03 Jun '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34151 Bug ID: 34151 Summary: Hard due date being ignored in circulation rules in favor of loan period Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 22.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: esther.melander(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com To recreate: 1. Create a circulation rule for All Patrons, All Categories with a loan period of 10 days. 2. Set a hard due date for a date after the loan period. 3. Check out an item and see that the due date is based off the loan period and not the hard due date. Also, setting a loan period for the exact time period and the hard due date (so the dates are the same) also appears to fail and it reverts to the previous loan period. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 34429] New: Expiry Date not included on 'Quick add new patron' form
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jun '26

03 Jun '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34429 Bug ID: 34429 Summary: Expiry Date not included on 'Quick add new patron' form Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 22.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dch(a)interleaf.ie QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com I have added dateexpiry to the SysPref PatronQuickAddFields but Expiry Date is not included on 'Quick add new patron' form -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 33610] New: Accelerated Reading Level Search not accurate
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jun '26

03 Jun '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33610 Bug ID: 33610 Summary: Accelerated Reading Level Search not accurate Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 22.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dch(a)interleaf.ie QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If you search for Accelerated Reader level 6 the system shows all the books at that level, but it also picks up titles that are a reading level of .6 e.g. Angels and Demons by Dan Brown is 5.6 but it is listed when I search for AR level 6. We need a search that will only return books at level 6 (including all decimal points up to 7) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 34190] New: Record overlay rule ignored on z39.50 import in Advanced Editor
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jun '26

03 Jun '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34190 Bug ID: 34190 Summary: Record overlay rule ignored on z39.50 import in Advanced Editor Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 22.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: esther.melander(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl To recreate: 1. Create a Record overlay rule with Source, z39.50, 500, protect, skip, skip, skip, skip. 2. Edit a biblio in the Advanced Editor. 3. Make sure the record contains a 500 tag with text. Save 4. Use advanced search to find a replacement bibliographic record - substitute. 5. Notice the 500 field may now be missing. 6. Save the record. The 500 field, which was protected, is not restored upon saving. The record overlay rules for z39.50 should work for both the basic and advanced editors. The Advanced search in the Advanced Editor appears to function as the Replace record via z39.50 in the basic editor and should behave similarly when applying overlay rules. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 34090] New: Add context for AV category vs. patron category
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jun '26

03 Jun '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34090 Bug ID: 34090 Summary: Add context for AV category vs. patron category Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 22.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: I18N/L10N Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: frederic(a)tamil.fr Sometimes only the word category appears for patron category or AV category. As we have translated patron category differently to authorised value category, this creates some issues with translations. It would be nice to add some context here. Another solution could be to add "patron" and "authorised value" in front. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1