July 2024 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 29033] New: Add C4::Context->multivalue_preference
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Oct '26

12 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29033 Bug ID: 29033 Summary: Add C4::Context->multivalue_preference Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org I've seen many places in which a syspref is read, and then split used to convert the contents into a list. It seems it would be simple to add a method to do that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 46

[Bug 31430] New: Add column configuration to tables in vendor search
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Oct '26

09 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31430 Bug ID: 31430 Summary: Add column configuration to tables in vendor search Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org It would be nice if we could select which columns to display in the tables shown in vendor search. It might also be nice to have the option to filter and export, but as they would take up some space, it might be discussable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 28989] New: Allow viewing systempreferences only
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Oct '26

09 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28989 Bug ID: 28989 Summary: Allow viewing systempreferences only Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com See bug 28882. It might be helpful if we could distinguish between viewing sysprefs and changing them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 35711] New: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Oct '26

09 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35711 Bug ID: 35711 Summary: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Packaging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: magnus(a)libriotech.no QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: mtj(a)kohaaloha.com Seeing this when trying to build custom packages: dh clean --fail-missing --with bash-completion dh: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 9 in use) dh_auto_clean -O--fail-missing dh_auto_clean: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 9 in use) dh_clean -O--fail-missing dh_clean: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 are deprecated (level 9 in use) No idea what it means, but see bug 18908 for a similar fix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 36007] New: Add the ability to batch edit in Course Reserves
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Oct '26

09 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36007 Bug ID: 36007 Summary: Add the ability to batch edit in Course Reserves Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 23.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Course reserves Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org It would be nice to have the ability to batch edit in course reserves. A scenario could be, a course is reactivated, the items in the course are the same, but they all need to be relocated for the course is happening at a different branch, or a different reserve location. A batch edit would allow staff to retain the list of items in the course, but easily update the new course reserves values. At this time, each item would need to be individually edited. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 21453] New: blinddetail-biblio-search.pl/.tt use hardcoded subfield values for MARC21
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Oct '26

09 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21453 Bug ID: 21453 Summary: blinddetail-biblio-search.pl/.tt use hardcoded subfield values for MARC21 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: arouss1980(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If you add or alter an authority record and edit one of the MARC fields in UNIMARC 5XX 'See Also Reference Tracing Block' [1], you can click on the ellipsis (...) next to a subfield [2] to launch the authority finder plugin. This plugin allows you to search for an authority and then pick an entry from the 'Special relationship:' dropdown menu in order to set the relationship between the two authorities. The results list of the authority finder contains 'Choose' buttons which _should_ insert all data from the chosen authority into the appropriate subfields of the MARC tag you are editing [3]. However, in UNIMARC setups this does not work: clicking on 'Choose' only populates subfield $a ('Entry Element') with data, but not subfields $3 and $5 ('Authority Record Number' and 'Tracing Control', respectively), which are just as important for correct authority linking. I've tracked this down to these lines of code which are MARC21-specific and use hardcoded subfield values in blinddetail-biblio-search.pl: 91 for ( $field->subfields ) { 92 next if $_->[0] eq '9'; # $9 will be set with authid value 101 push( @subfield_loop, { marc_subfield => 'w', marc_values => $relationship } ) if ( $relationship ); There is also this code in the template blinddetail-biblio-search.tt: 38 [%- END -%]‡9[% authid | html %]"; 138 if(code.value=='9'){ 139 subfield.value = "[% authid |replace("'", "\'") |replace('"', '\"') |replace('\n', '\\n') |replace('\r', '\\r') %]"; These code fragments don't work 100% because in UNIMARC authorities the authid value is stored in subfield $3 and the relationship code in $5. I propose to modify the Perl script above (which is currently MARC flavour agnostic), have it check the 'marcflavour' system preference, and use that to decide which subfield to push the authority relator code to. A similar approach in the template file will set the authid subfield value depending on whether you are a MARC21 or UNIMARC user. [1] Known as the 'Related Access Point Block' in recent IFLA updates. [2] For the ellipsis to appear next to a subfield, you must view the MARC structure of the relevant authority type and then edit the subfields of the tag you're interested in. Finally, you must select an authority type from the 'Thesaurus:' dropdown menu. [3] Under the hood each 'Choose' button is a call to the JS function doauth(), which in turn calls blinddetail-biblio-search.pl with the parameters required (authid, relationship, etc.). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 42

[Bug 37250] New: Redesign labels home page to match other module home pages
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Oct '26

09 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37250 Bug ID: 37250 Summary: Redesign labels home page to match other module home pages Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org I propose to update the label creator home page so that it has a grid of links like the circulation or cataloging home pages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 31

[Bug 31506] New: Add "backup days" to /etc/koha/koha-common.conf
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Oct '26

09 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31506 Bug ID: 31506 Summary: Add "backup days" to /etc/koha/koha-common.conf Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Packaging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: magnus(a)libriotech.no QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: mtj(a)kohaaloha.com koha-run-backups takes the --days argument to say how many days of backup we should keep around. The value of this is set to two in the default /etc/cron.daily/koha-common that is installed by the Debian packages. I routinely increase this value to keep more backup. One thing that can happen now is that I want to create fresh backups for all the sites on a server before doing an upgrade. So I run koha-run-backups manually, but I forget about the --days argument. Result: I loose a lot of backup! It would be nice if the default for --days could be set somewhere like /etc/koha/koha-common.conf. That way we could run koha-run-backups both from cron and manually, without the --days argument, and keep the same amount of backups either way. If --days is given as an argument, it should override the default. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 27138] New: Host items are not included in Z39 results when using EasyAnalytics
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Oct '26

09 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27138 Bug ID: 27138 Summary: Host items are not included in Z39 results when using EasyAnalytics Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If a library enables EasyAnalytics and links two records in the catalog then the host items show on the child record. If you search for these records via Z3950 (via zebra directly or the responder) the host items are not shown -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 65

[Bug 21309] New: Add flag to change password
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 08 Oct '26

08 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21309 Bug ID: 21309 Summary: Add flag to change password Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com We should add a flag to patron accounts that, if checked, would require the patron to sign in to their account and change their password. This option could incorporate the following functionality: * Allow patron to sign in with old password then prompt for a new password. * E-mail patron notifying them with the need to change. * When active, it would block checkouts and sip authentication until done. * Anytime a password is changed in the account, whether staff side or opac, the change would clear the flag in the patron account. * Date of change should be time stamped. Christopher -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 21