August 2024 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 36880] New: Record overlay rules are not validated on add or edit
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Aug '25

30 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36880 Bug ID: 36880 Summary: Record overlay rules are not validated on add or edit Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: bibliothek(a)th-wildau.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com The validation of record overlay rules does not work when adding a new rule or editing an existing rule. To reproduce: a) open http://localhost:8081/cgi-bin/koha/admin/marc-overlay-rules.pl b) just click + Add rule c) a new rule with an empty tag is saved Expected behavior: the input 'tag' should be marked as required -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 29

[Bug 36527] New: Patron category or item type not changing when editing another circulation rule
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Aug '25

30 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36527 Bug ID: 36527 Summary: Patron category or item type not changing when editing another circulation rule Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com This was reported to me as a slightly different problem, but I was able to recreate it partially in master. When editing circulation rules, if you click on "Edit" on another rule and confirm you want to change that rule, the patron category and item type don't always change to the new one. To recreate: 1. Go to Administration > Circulation and fine rules 2. Add a couple of rules with various patron category/item type combinations 3. Click on "Edit" next to one of the rules --> The line should become highlighted in yellow and the values should be copied in the very last row 4. Click on "Edit" next to another rule 5. Click OK in the browser dialog box to confirm you want to edit another rule --> Depending on the rules, the values for the patron category and/or item type might not change in the editing row 6. Repeat steps 4 and 5 --> The patron category and item type do not always change I'm using Chrome with 23.12.00.015 on KTD (it does the same on my local master and my local 23.05.05 too). The person who reported it to me has 23.05.01. And their problem is that even on the first click (step 3), the values in the edit row are not the correct ones. The patron category stays "All" (the default value in the edit row), and the item type changes to the correct item type. I thought it could be a cache problem, but with KTD I assumed that was all included and taken care of. We also restarted plack and memcache on the client's install and the problem remains. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 19

[Bug 36096] New: Add ability to select default sort and display length for tables on waitingreserves.pl
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Aug '25

30 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36096 Bug ID: 36096 Summary: Add ability to select default sort and display length for tables on waitingreserves.pl Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com There are 3 tables on waitingreserves.pl. ( holdscr | holdso | holdst ) It would be nice if we could set the default sort and display length via Table settings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 25

[Bug 36592] New: Cannot save Default display length or Default sort order in Table settings
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Aug '25

30 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36592 Bug ID: 36592 Summary: Cannot save Default display length or Default sort order in Table settings Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com To recreate: 1. Go to Admin > Table settings 2. Find a table that includes Default display length or Default sort order. 3. Try to save a new value. 4. When the page reloads the new values have not been saved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 37302] New: xt/api.t should fail if swagger-cli is missing
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '25

29 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37302 Bug ID: 37302 Summary: xt/api.t should fail if swagger-cli is missing Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Currently, we skip if the swagger-cli utility is missing. This was hiding genuine issues in Jenkins, we should make it as a failure with a suitable message to the end user. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 39

[Bug 35904] New: C4::Auth::checkauth cannot be tested easily
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '25

29 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35904 Bug ID: 35904 Summary: C4::Auth::checkauth cannot be tested easily Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com Reporter: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We are printing headers and the tests are hard to write. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 40

[Bug 35625] New: Add support for system flag to additional fields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '25

29 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35625 Bug ID: 35625 Summary: Add support for system flag to additional fields Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Additional fields could be used to extend some multi-use tables by default without needing to extend the initial table. It would be helpful to be able to mark such additional fields with the is_system flag to prevent user deletion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 38

[Bug 35044] New: Additional fields: Allow for multiple selection of values
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '25

29 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35044 Bug ID: 35044 Summary: Additional fields: Allow for multiple selection of values Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Depends on: 32751 If the field is an AV field, there should be an option to allow for multiple selection. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32751 [Bug 32751] [Omnibus] Extend, improve and standardize additional fields -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 189

[Bug 37576] New: Add additional fields support to ERM Agreements
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '25

29 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37576 Bug ID: 37576 Summary: Add additional fields support to ERM Agreements Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ERM Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com Reporter: michaela.sieber(a)kit.edu QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com, jonathan.field(a)ptfs-europe.com, martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com, matt.blenkinsop(a)ptfs-europe.com, pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com After adding additional fields support to Licences (Bug 35287) we would love to see additional fields support for Agreements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 39

[Bug 34324] New: Merge OPACProblemReport and CatalogConcern functions
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '25

29 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34324 Bug ID: 34324 Summary: Merge OPACProblemReport and CatalogConcern functions Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org I initially looked at adding the Catalog Concerns functionality into the existing OPAC Problem reports feature but quick found that troublesome. However, I still think the two sets of functionality can be merged and I designed the Catalog Concerns data structure and api's with that in mind. We should start migrating the OPAC Problem reports functionality into the Catalog concerns 'tickets' structure as the beginnings of a new 'Enquiries' module. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 45