November 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 36868] New: Add ability to automatically empty cart after placing holds ( staff interface and OPAC )
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Sep '26

14 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36868 Bug ID: 36868 Summary: Add ability to automatically empty cart after placing holds ( staff interface and OPAC ) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Some librarians would like to have the cart automatically clear itself after placing holds on items in the current cart. This would behave similar to how online retail/e-commerce sites work after one has purchased items. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 113

[Bug 39728] New: Remove GetUnprocessedSuggestions from C4/Suggestions.pm
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Sep '26

14 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39728 Bug ID: 39728 Summary: Remove GetUnprocessedSuggestions from C4/Suggestions.pm Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: baptiste.wojtkowski(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 21

[Bug 39729] New: Add option -exact_days to filter_by_last_update
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Sep '26

14 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39729 Bug ID: 39729 Summary: Add option -exact_days to filter_by_last_update Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: baptiste.wojtkowski(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org In order to remove GetUnprocessedSuggestions from C4/Suggestions.pm, we need a function to get suggestions aged by an exact number of days. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 29

[Bug 38262] New: Add additional fields to Vendors
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Sep '26

14 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38262 Bug ID: 38262 Summary: Add additional fields to Vendors Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: matt.blenkinsop(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We should add additional fields capability to Vendors following the Vue migration -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 101

[Bug 38290] New: Add library group limits to vendors
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Sep '26

14 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38290 Bug ID: 38290 Summary: Add library group limits to vendors Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: matt.blenkinsop(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org It should be possible to limit which vendors can be seen based on library groups -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 56

[Bug 30144] New: Add support for EDI GIR:LVT, Servicing instructions, segment
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Sep '26

14 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30144 Bug ID: 30144 Summary: Add support for EDI GIR:LVT, Servicing instructions, segment Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We allow for free text instructions in the EDI FTX segment now, taken from the vendor notes field. But this is at the order level, it would be helpful to add support for the LVT segment at the line level. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 123

[Bug 38990] New: Statistical patron checkouts don't display alert that LOST value has been cleared
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Sep '26

11 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38990 Bug ID: 38990 Summary: Statistical patron checkouts don't display alert that LOST value has been cleared Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 24.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: catrina(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Bug 37505 resolved getting information about items when checking them out to statistical patrons, however lost values (aside from Claims) do not alert or display that it has been resolved when checked out to the statistical patron as of 24.05.06. To test: 1. Create a Statistical Patron 2. Set BlockReturnOfLostItems to Don't Block. 3. Mark an item as missing. 4. Check it out to the Statistical Patron. 5. You get a message "Local use recorded." <- You should see a message, "Item was lost, but has now been found." 6. Check your item - the lost value has been cleared and is now available. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 38187] New: Add ability to delete patron attributes in batch patron modification
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Sep '26

11 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38187 Bug ID: 38187 Summary: Add ability to delete patron attributes in batch patron modification Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: enica(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com You can batch modify patron attribute in a batch, but you cannot completely delete the attribute on a patron's account. To test: - Add an attribute to a patron's account. - Perform batch patron modification. - Under Patron attribute you can either add a new attribute or update existing one. You can set the attribute to blank to clear the values, but the attribute will remain on the account as blank. It would be nice if there's a way to delete the patron attribute all together. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 39314] New: RabbitMQ can't upgrade from 3.x to 4.x without running a data migration on 3.13
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Sep '26

11 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39314 Bug ID: 39314 Summary: RabbitMQ can't upgrade from 3.x to 4.x without running a data migration on 3.13 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Installation and upgrade (command-line installer) Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: victor(a)tuxayo.net QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: tomascohen(a)gmail.com Reported to Debian as it affects their next release which will do a jump from 3.10 to 4.0: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100165#10 Which can't work: https://www.rabbitmq.com/docs/upgrade «You can only upgrade to RabbitMQ 4.0 from RabbitMQ 3.13.» «stable feature flags have to be enabled before the upgrade. The upgrade will fail if you miss this step.» See there more more details. ----- For us: is there still data in RabbitMQ when stopping a Koha instance and upgrading it? I recall reading that the DB was basically mirroring the message queue data during a discussion about the actual need for a dedicated message queue. Does it mean the koha-common package can wipe the RabbitMQ data which will allow it to start without issue? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 21

[Bug 40594] New: Allow batch record modification to create multiple items on existing bibs
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Sep '26

11 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40594 Bug ID: 40594 Summary: Allow batch record modification to create multiple items on existing bibs Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pedro.amorim(a)openfifth.co.uk QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Created attachment 185115 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=185115&action=e… MMT sample multiple mapped items Bug 26869 only considered one item to be added per library modification execution, if more than one item is mapped, it fails with an FK constraint. I don't know the reason behind it, but the original test plan stated: test with more than one occurrence of 952$a -> confirm 'FK constraint' error is shown, no modification made I don't think there's any reason why this restriction should exist. The attached Marc Modification Template sample should work perfectly fine and add new - multiple - items to biblio records, as mapped. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 13