February 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 38638] New: Offer the option to set non-priority option when placing multiple holds
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38638 Bug ID: 38638 Summary: Offer the option to set non-priority option when placing multiple holds Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Depends on: 22789 When placing multiple holds in the staff interface there isn't an option to set the holds as non-priority. As far as I know there's not a technical reason not to include the option? Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22789 [Bug 22789] Establish non-priority holds -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 16

[Bug 36549] New: es_indexer_daemon.pl leaks memory
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36549 Bug ID: 36549 Summary: es_indexer_daemon.pl leaks memory Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org background_jobs_worker.pl runs its tasks in child processes which return their memory to the OS when they complete. es_indexer_daemon.pl runs everything in itself which means if it needs to allocate a large amount of memory for an indexing job, it will hold on to that memory allocation for its entire process life. -- I've got an es_indexer_daemon.pl which is using over 1GB of memory. Once it's done with its indexing activity, I'm going to restart it to get it back down to a more reasonable amount of allocated memory. I reckon we should be forking off child processes to do the worker. We don't need many. We just need 1 that is short lived so that it can return the memory back to the OS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 36

[Bug 31925] New: AutoCreateAuthorities needs to preserve subject heading thesaurus to not create duplicate authority records
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31925 Bug ID: 31925 Summary: AutoCreateAuthorities needs to preserve subject heading thesaurus to not create duplicate authority records Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: phil(a)chetcolibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com Depends on: 30280 Bug 30280 taught the linker that "650 _ 0 $aFeminism" and "650 _ 7 $aFeminism$2sao" are not the same heading, so a bib record containing the latter should not be linked to the authority record which matches the former. However, AutoCreateAuthorities just creates LCSH authority records from anything, no matter what the values of indicator 2 and subfield 2 are. As a result, if you have an LCSH authority record for a term, and you import/create a non-LCSH term in a bib record and save it, AutoCreateAuthorities will create a new duplicate LCSH authority record and link to that. Every single time, a new duplicate. Steps to reproduce: 1. Use ElasticSearch, since the patch for bug 30280 only expected to work there, and in fact broke linking on Zebra, bug 31924. 2. Enable the preferences AutoCreateAuthorities, AutoLinkBiblios, CatalogModuleRelink 3. Edit any bib record, add a 650 tag, set the second indicator to 7, type Feminism in subfield a and type sao in subfield 2. 4. Save the record, edit it again, note the authority record id in subfield 9 of the Feminism heading. 5. Edit any other bib record, add a 650 tag, set the second indicator to 7, type Feminism in subfield a and type sao in subfield 2. 6. Save the record, edit it again, note the authority record id in subfield 9 of the Feminism heading. The two authority record ids should be the same, since the headings are identical, but instead one will be linked to, say, 1708 and the next to 1709, an identical duplicate record. Rather than setting position 11 of field 008 in the authority record to "a" for LCSH, AutoCreateAuthorities should have set it to "z" for Other and put sao in subfield f of field 040 (and for non-7, non-0 values of indicator 2, it should be setting 008/11 to the correct letter for that indicator value). Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30280 [Bug 30280] Support authority records with common subject headings from different thesaurus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 105

[Bug 39204] New: Problem with cancelling a hold via SIP without marking it as waiting returns an error
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39204 Bug ID: 39204 Summary: Problem with cancelling a hold via SIP without marking it as waiting returns an error Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: SIP2 Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org >From Bug 38615: "When testing I noticed something both with and without the patch (so this is a general SIP question) If you place a hold and then try to cancel the hold with this command before checking the item into the hold shelf the SIP cancel request returns |AFError with transaction drop_hold:|" Easy to recreate with SIP emulator: 1. /kohadevbox/koha/misc/sip_cli_emulator.pl -a localhost -p 6001 -l CPL -su term1 -sp term1 -m hold --patron 23529000035676 --item 39999000001310 --hold-mode + 2. /kohadevbox/koha/misc/sip_cli_emulator.pl -a localhost -p 6001 -l CPL -su term1 -sp term1 -m hold --patron 23529000035676 --item 39999000001310 --hold-mode - 3. See the error: AFError with transaction drop_hold: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 25

[Bug 38196] New: Filter out concerns by specific status does not include concern without status
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38196 Bug ID: 38196 Summary: Filter out concerns by specific status does not include concern without status Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Depends on: 35628 You can filter out concerns by status (ie. linked with TICKET_STATUS AV). But if you use this "Filter" link on top of the page to remove the concerns with this specific status, it will also remove the concerns without a specific status. concern 1 | Open concern 2 | Resolved concern 3 | status_1 concern 4 | status_2 "Filter status_1" should remove concern 3 only. However it will only show concern 4. This is because the query is ([-and => {status => { '!=' => "status_1" }}]) And does not include status that are NULL in DB. use Koha::Tickets; my $t = Koha::Tickets->search; say $_->status // "undefined" for $t->as_list; say "==="; $t = Koha::Tickets->search([-and => {status => { '!=' => "status_1" }}]); say $_->status for $t->as_list; undefined undefined status_1 status_2 === status_2 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35628 [Bug 35628] Add optional statuses to catalog concerns -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 37

[Bug 21860] New: Marc modification templates cannot check or change indicators
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21860 Bug ID: 21860 Summary: Marc modification templates cannot check or change indicators Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pasi.kallinen(a)joensuu.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The marc modification templates have no way of checking or changing indicator values. This seems like a pretty big oversight. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 161

[Bug 23998] New: Messages REST API
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23998 Bug ID: 23998 Summary: Messages REST API Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: REST api Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lari.taskula(a)hypernova.fi Expose messages table via REST API. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 74

[Bug 34210] New: ISSUEQSLIP should offer checkout session items only
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34210 Bug ID: 34210 Summary: ISSUEQSLIP should offer checkout session items only Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Koha needs to have some mechanism in place to track items a patron checked out in a particular session (this information clears every time a new patron is loaded. Maybe linked to when the last patron button is updated). It would then be helpful in being creating some kind of mechanism so that ISSUEQSLIP could print just the items you just checked out rather than everything today, or everything currently checked out altogether. I can narrow down something close to this session with some template toolkit and time logic, but that is rather complicated for some libraries, and isn't foolproof. It would be preferred if Koha kept track of checkout sessions and offered an easy to implement option in the slip template. This is very needed and common. You don't go the grocery store and get a receipt for everything you bought that day. Just for that transaction. This would line up with current practices. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 38745] New: Add a proof of concept JSON-RPC driven endpoint for RPC style calls that don't fit REST ideals
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38745 Bug ID: 38745 Summary: Add a proof of concept JSON-RPC driven endpoint for RPC style calls that don't fit REST ideals Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Web services Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We have a few places where RPC style calls to perform various actions makes sense.. thinking 'bulk' actions and also 'test' actions for things like the sftp connection checks I propose a distinct /rpc endpoint with a basic router built into the endpoint and oneOf being used to specify using the existing OpenAPI specifications. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 25

[Bug 38023] New: Add ability to exclude certain item types for advance_notice.pl
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38023 Bug ID: 38023 Summary: Add ability to exclude certain item types for advance_notice.pl Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Libraries often request that certain item types not be reported upon in an advance notice. It's pretty trivial to exclude them from a DUE or PREDUE with TT but the digest ones are not as easy. Would be nice if there was an flag in the cron to exclude. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2