March 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 39231] New: booking - transfer a booking to an available copy
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Mar '25

03 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39231 Bug ID: 39231 Summary: booking - transfer a booking to an available copy Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 24.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: koha(a)collecto.ca QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Hi, It would be nice to add a feature in the planned booking tool to transfer a booking to an available copy, without requiring cancellation and re-creation of the booking. Currently when the situation occurs, you have to cancel the planned reservation and redo it on the copy that is now available. It would be faster to be able to transfer the planned reservation. Thnaks, Patrick. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 2234] Make cart email from/reply-to/return-path address configurable
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Mar '25

03 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=2234 trevor.diamond(a)mainlib.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |trevor.diamond(a)mainlib.org --- Comment #5 from trevor.diamond(a)mainlib.org --- I also think this should be changed. I expected the same email that sends out password reset and check out slip emails to also send the cart. Would the system preference be to put in another email? Or to make the email from the logged in library vs. the system? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 36361] New: Show warning about pending ILL requests when a patron is deleted
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Mar '25

03 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36361 Bug ID: 36361 Summary: Show warning about pending ILL requests when a patron is deleted Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: clemens.tubach(a)kit.edu, gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com, michaela.sieber(a)kit.edu, pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com When a patron is deleted and they have pending/undelivered ILL requests, we should at least show a warning, like we do with suggestions/holds. This is even more important until bug 32630 is fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 28141] New: Accessibility: OPAC Advanced Search fields aren't labelled
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Mar '25

03 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28141 Bug ID: 28141 Summary: Accessibility: OPAC Advanced Search fields aren't labelled Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: bolshawh(a)parliament.uk QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The OPAC advanced search page has unlabelled search fields making them inaccessible to users of screen readers. This is a complicated page to get right and I'm not entirely sure how best to fix this. Here are some of the issues with the page currently: Example issue 1: When using NVDA to access the search form fields out of context, it is hard to tell which index (keyword, author, title etc.) you are searching. This is an issue when searching multiple fields at once. "Enter search terms; edit; has auto complete" It would be better if the search form field was linked to the index combo box. We could use aria-labelledby but there may be better ways to do this. Example Issue 2: The label for "search-field_0" is blank. Example Issue 3: The search terms are linked by 'and' but this isn't entirely clear out of context using a screen reader: " ;combo box; collapsed; Subject" "and;combo box; collapsed; Title" "and;combo box; collapsed; Publisher Location" "Location and availability:; combo box; collapsed; All Libraries" "Sort by:; combo box; collapsed; Relevance" "Language; combo box; collapsed; No Limit" Example Issue 4: The remove field buttons aren't programmatically linked to the field they are removing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 36471] New: Accessibility: OPAC search results header obscures content when zooming in
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Mar '25

03 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36471 Bug ID: 36471 Summary: Accessibility: OPAC search results header obscures content when zooming in Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Blocks: 33516 Moved from comment on bug 33516: (In reply to Georgia Newman from comment #1) > We have recently reviewed our accessibility statement and we have noticed > this issue on the search results page of our OPAC. Users should be able to > enlarge/zoom up to 400% without loss of function. However, when display is > set to 1280x wide, looking at the search results page, we find that a user > can’t enlarge above 200% before the search results header obscures > everything on the page, so the search results aren’t visible. This fails > WCAG 2.1 criterium 1.4.10. We have noted this as an issue in our > accessibility statement and would like to see this improved in order to > comply with WCAG standards. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33516 [Bug 33516] Accessibility: WCAG 1.4.1 - Content reflow -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 36285] New: Staff UI form fieldset styling needs update
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Mar '25

03 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36285 Bug ID: 36285 Summary: Staff UI form fieldset styling needs update Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff interface Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 21

[Bug 19772] New: Wrong success message if PATRON_NOTE is not defined
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Mar '25

03 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19772 Bug ID: 19772 Summary: Wrong success message if PATRON_NOTE is not defined Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: aleisha(a)catalyst.net.nz Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 14224 There is no PATRON_NOTE notice template created for new installation. If the pref (AllowCheckoutNotes) is set to on, a patron can let a note from the OPAC and the message "Your note about $TITLE / has been saved and sent to the library." is display to the screen. But actually the Koha logs mention "No circulation PATRON_NOTE letter transported by email at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/C4/Letters.pm line 697." and no notice is generated Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14224 [Bug 14224] patron notes about item shown at check in -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 11

[Bug 10190] Overdue notice triggers based on item type
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Mar '25

03 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10190 Martin Renvoize (ashimema) <martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Failed QA |Signed Off --- Comment #170 from Martin Renvoize (ashimema) <martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com> --- (In reply to Victor Grousset/tuxayo from comment #169) > Comment on attachment 178648 [details] [review] > Bug 10190: Add a vue app for circulation triggers > > Review of attachment 178648 [details] [review]: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > ::: koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/en/modules/admin/circulation_triggers.tt > @@ +25,5 @@ > > +  > > + > > + [% MACRO jsinclude BLOCK %] > > + [% INCLUDE 'calendar.inc' %] > > +  > > Is the FIXME for calendar.inc above or datatables.inc bellow or the 4 > includes below? It was for calendar.inc and if you look at the other vue apps, it's consistent throughout them so far. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 35402] Update the OPAC and staff interface to Bootstrap 5
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Mar '25

03 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35402 Michał <schodkowy.omegi-0r(a)icloud.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.koha-community | |.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi | |?id=39223 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 8871] Many "subroutine redefined" warnings from C4 and Koha modules
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Mar '25

03 Mar '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8871 --- Comment #8 from David Cook <dcook(a)prosentient.com.au> --- Although it looks like we might be ignoring Subroutine redefined in the precommit hook, so maybe we just need to expand it to also ignore "Constant subroutine .* redefined at" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0