April 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 38503] New: Add a Cypress task to generate objects based on its swagger def spec
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '25

29 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38503 Bug ID: 38503 Summary: Add a Cypress task to generate objects based on its swagger def spec Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We have TestBuilder for the Perl tests. However for the Cypress tests we have to: 1. either mock all the routes (which is painful and time-consuming), 2. or rely on the existing data in DB (which will produce failures if data has been inserted, and tests will have to cleanup before/after, which is painful, time-consuming and not robust) We should have a way to generate objects easily, in order to mock the response of a GET route easily. We can actually rely on the swagger spec files (the definition file) to generate random data and mock the response of routes. The first intended goal is to provide tests for the tables (bug 38461) and allow future enhancements in this area (see dependent bugs of bug 36640). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 72

[Bug 37302] New: xt/api.t should fail if swagger-cli is missing
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '25

29 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37302 Bug ID: 37302 Summary: xt/api.t should fail if swagger-cli is missing Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Currently, we skip if the swagger-cli utility is missing. This was hiding genuine issues in Jenkins, we should make it as a failure with a suitable message to the end user. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 39

[Bug 35904] New: C4::Auth::checkauth cannot be tested easily
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '25

29 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35904 Bug ID: 35904 Summary: C4::Auth::checkauth cannot be tested easily Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com Reporter: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We are printing headers and the tests are hard to write. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 40

[Bug 38474] New: t/db_dependent/Letters.t can fail randomly
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '25

29 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38474 Bug ID: 38474 Summary: t/db_dependent/Letters.t can fail randomly Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com 17:00:43 koha_1 | # Failed test 'Time status changed equals time queued when created in message_queue table' 17:00:43 koha_1 | # at t/db_dependent/Letters.t line 156. 17:00:43 koha_1 | # got: '2024-11-15 16:00:00' 17:00:43 koha_1 | # expected: '2024-11-15 15:59:59' 17:00:43 koha_1 | # Looks like you failed 1 test of 103. 17:00:43 koha_1 | [16:00:09] t/db_dependent/Letters.t .................................................... It looks like it took a little longer than expected maybe and the test fails because of it. If this is the issue, we could make it a little more robust. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 11

[Bug 35625] New: Add support for system flag to additional fields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '25

29 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35625 Bug ID: 35625 Summary: Add support for system flag to additional fields Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Additional fields could be used to extend some multi-use tables by default without needing to extend the initial table. It would be helpful to be able to mark such additional fields with the is_system flag to prevent user deletion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 38

[Bug 35044] New: Additional fields: Allow for multiple selection of values
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '25

29 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35044 Bug ID: 35044 Summary: Additional fields: Allow for multiple selection of values Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Depends on: 32751 If the field is an AV field, there should be an option to allow for multiple selection. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32751 [Bug 32751] [Omnibus] Extend, improve and standardize additional fields -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 189

[Bug 37576] New: Add additional fields support to ERM Agreements
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '25

29 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37576 Bug ID: 37576 Summary: Add additional fields support to ERM Agreements Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ERM Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com Reporter: michaela.sieber(a)kit.edu QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com, jonathan.field(a)ptfs-europe.com, martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com, matt.blenkinsop(a)ptfs-europe.com, pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com After adding additional fields support to Licences (Bug 35287) we would love to see additional fields support for Agreements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 39

[Bug 38272] New: Add permission check for erm permission to additional-fields.tt
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '25

29 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38272 Bug ID: 38272 Summary: Add permission check for erm permission to additional-fields.tt Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 - low Component: ERM Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com Reporter: paul.derscheid(a)lmscloud.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com, jonathan.field(a)ptfs-europe.com, martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com, matt.blenkinsop(a)ptfs-europe.com, pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com There was an oversight when adding additional fields support for erm licenses. In the permission check, we don't check yet for CAN_user_erm. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 23

[Bug 34324] New: Merge OPACProblemReport and CatalogConcern functions
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '25

29 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34324 Bug ID: 34324 Summary: Merge OPACProblemReport and CatalogConcern functions Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org I initially looked at adding the Catalog Concerns functionality into the existing OPAC Problem reports feature but quick found that troublesome. However, I still think the two sets of functionality can be merged and I designed the Catalog Concerns data structure and api's with that in mind. We should start migrating the OPAC Problem reports functionality into the Catalog concerns 'tickets' structure as the beginnings of a new 'Enquiries' module. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 45

[Bug 38449] New: Move additional fields for ERM packages above list of titles in package
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '25

29 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38449 Bug ID: 38449 Summary: Move additional fields for ERM packages above list of titles in package Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: ERM Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com, jonathan.field(a)ptfs-europe.com, martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com, matt.blenkinsop(a)ptfs-europe.com, pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com Depends on: 37577 Moved from bug 37577: I feel Michaela is definitely right in that the additional fields should be above the list of linked titles on the packages summary page. Currently we have: Package details - package titles - additional fields It should be: Package details - additional fields - package titles Otherwise the "descriptive information" that the additional fields provide will be lost below a long list of titles. I cannot tell how hard it is to move these elements around in the template, but if you can, please provide a follow-up. Otherwise please file a bug so we can fix this later. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37577 [Bug 37577] Add additional fields support to ERM packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2