May 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 38067] New: Default cash register follow up to 36844
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Aug '25

28 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38067 Bug ID: 38067 Summary: Default cash register follow up to 36844 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 24.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 - low Component: Point of Sale Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: holly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com Nick commented on 36844, comment 9: "I found that when switching from a branch with a default register to one without, the default register for the last branch was remaining selected (though disabled)"h When switching from library A to library B the cash register should switch to register B or none. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 17983] New: Add minutes loan to DiscreteCalendar
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Aug '25

28 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17983 Bug ID: 17983 Summary: Add minutes loan to DiscreteCalendar Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Holidays Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: mehdi.hamidi(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Hello everyone, This is an additional feature to our new Discrete Calendar. Theses patches add the possibility to choose the loan unit as minutes in circulations rules. Test plan: - Apply patch of Bugzilla 17015 - Apply this patch. - Run test t/db_dependent/minutes_loan.t - Create new item type for the new rule. - Create circulation rule and fill the fields, make sure the unit is set to : minutes, choose the item type of the one created above.- - Checkout an item that follow the circulation rule and set due date in the past. - Run fines.pl. - Check if the correct amount was calculated. - Note: make sure to factor in the fine grace period if set and the system preference FinesIncludeGracePeriod. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 49

[Bug 30598] New: Replacement cost is not copied from retail price when ordering from file
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Aug '25

28 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30598 Bug ID: 30598 Summary: Replacement cost is not copied from retail price when ordering from file Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org In acquisitions, when you order an individual title, and you enter the "vendor price", it is copied in the retail price, the replacement cost, and the budgeted cost. However, if you order from a file, when you enter the price, the replacement price field stays empty. To test : 1- In Acquisitions, create a basket 2- Add an order from a new (empty) record --> Note that when you enter the "vendor price", it is copied in the "replacement cost" field 3- Add an order from a new file --> Note that when you enter the "price", the "replacement price" field stays empty This means you have to enter the price twice for each item ordered. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 29

[Bug 31694] New: MARC overlay rules presets don't change anything if presets are translated
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Aug '25

28 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31694 Bug ID: 31694 Summary: MARC overlay rules presets don't change anything if presets are translated Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com In MARC overlay rules, if the preset names are not in English, the settings don't change. Example 1. In staff interface in English, go to Administration > MARC overlay rules 2. In the 'Preset' column, try the different options. Notice the Added, Appended, Removed, Deleted settings change according to the preset you chose 3. Change interface in another language (I tried fr-CA and de-DE) 4. Try the presets again. Note that if the preset name is in English (some in fr-CA are not translated), the settings change, but if the preset name is translated, nothing changes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 60

[Bug 38180] New: Don't show label if 520 ind1=8 (MARC21)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Aug '25

28 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38180 Bug ID: 38180 Summary: Don't show label if 520 ind1=8 (MARC21) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Bibliographic data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Bug 29471 added the display of field 520 in the detailed record in the staff interface for MARC21. According to the MARC21 standard (https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd520.html) there should not be a label before the content of the field if ind1 = 8 (no display constant). Currently, if ind1 = 8, it shows 'Summary'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 16

[Bug 36936] New: api/v1/bookings.t generates warnings
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Aug '25

28 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36936 Bug ID: 36936 Summary: api/v1/bookings.t generates warnings Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Blocks: 25515 t/db_dependent/api/v1/bookings.t .. 2/5 DBIx::Class::Storage::DBI::_dbh_execute(): DBI Exception: DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Duplicate entry '6' for key 'PRIMARY' at /kohadevbox/koha/Koha/Object.pm line 172 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25515 [Bug 25515] [OMNIBUS] Remove warnings and errors from tests output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 19

[Bug 29191] New: Linking biblio headings to authorities doesn't work with subdivisoins
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Aug '25

28 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29191 Bug ID: 29191 Summary: Linking biblio headings to authorities doesn't work with subdivisoins Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: alex.arnaud(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Linking biblio headings to authorities fails if there is subdivision(s) to search. Test plan (Unimarc example): - AutoCreateAuthorities On - BiblioAddsAuthorities On - add a subject in a biblio: 606 $aArt $xHistory => new authority is created - reindex authorities if Zebra search engine - add same subject in an other biblio: 606 $aArt $xHistory => again, a new authority is created Heading helper adds the subdiviion name in the search term. So the entire search query for mathing authorities is "Art generalsubdiv History" I'm looking for a fix, but i need someone to explain me why we add something which is similar to metada in the search term. This is done both for MARC21 and UNIMARC in C4::Heading::UNIMARC::_get_search_heading and C4::Heading::MARC21::_get_search_heading -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 20

[Bug 38960] New: Checking in a waiting hold only records a local use
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 27 Aug '25

27 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38960 Bug ID: 38960 Summary: Checking in a waiting hold only records a local use Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 24.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com This behavior has changed from 24.05. If you check in a waiting hold, it is supposed to pop up with the hold modal and let you know it is already waiting, and give you the option to confirm again or cancel the hold. On 24.11, it just records a local use. This ain't good! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 24226] New: Advanced editor - drops subfields/punctuation when manually linking authority records
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 27 Aug '25

27 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24226 Bug ID: 24226 Summary: Advanced editor - drops subfields/punctuation when manually linking authority records Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: mkstephens(a)lancasterseminary.edu QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl In the basic editor, it is possible to manually search for an authority record and link to it while preserving the original punctuation in the bibliographic record. It is also possible to search for and link to a broader heading and the additional subfields will remain intact in the bibliographic record. If you try to do either one of these things in the advanced editor using ctrl+shift+L to get to the authority search, once you link to the authority record that you select the MARC field you are editing will be rewritten to match the corresponding field in the authority record. It would be very nice if the advanced cataloging editor would simply append the authid in $9 and leave the rest of the MARC field alone. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 39949] New: Control of authorities subjects VS authors
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 27 Aug '25

27 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39949 Bug ID: 39949 Summary: Control of authorities subjects VS authors Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 24.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: Felix.Jutras(a)curateur.gouv.qc.ca QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl In our governemental organism we catalog archives taht are mainly text documents. We are doing control of the authorities. This includes subject in the zones 600's and authors in the zones 100 and 700. For our needs it would be importent to make strict control on the subject authorities. But we dont want authorities for authors. To put no control on the authors. But Koha let us put strict control on authorities no matter taht is subject or authors. For our need and probably others around the world i think it would be a good idea to make a separation on the autority control on subject and authors for the next update that will be the 25.11 in next November. So We can put strict control on the subjec authorities in the 600's zones and no control on the authors in 100 and 700. I would like to have a follow-up on this subject. It can be done in the following email. Felix.Jutras(a)curateur.gouv.qc.ca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 8