July 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 17438] New: Warnings from Business::ISBN::Data in webinstaller
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Apr '26

15 Apr '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17438 Bug ID: 17438 Summary: Warnings from Business::ISBN::Data in webinstaller Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Installation and upgrade (web-based installer) Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Upgrading to 16.06.00.032 I saw these warnings in the webinstaller: [Thu Oct 13 11:57:17 2016] Data.pm: ISBN_RANGE_MESSAGE is set to [] but that file does not exist! [Thu Oct 13 11:57:17 2016] Data.pm: Trying to use the default locations [Thu Oct 13 11:57:17 2016] Data.pm: at /usr/share/perl5/Business/ISBN.pm line 76. Related to the version of libbusiness-isbn-data-perl in Jessie. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 39740] New: Follow-up for bug 36932
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Apr '26

15 Apr '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39740 Bug ID: 39740 Summary: Follow-up for bug 36932 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Command-line Utilities Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: robin(a)catalyst.net.nz See 36932. Adjust handling of dev_install, gitified_install etc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 88

[Bug 31131] New: MARC21: XSLT links for 776 do not honor UseControlNumber when set to Don't use
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Apr '26

15 Apr '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31131 Bug ID: 31131 Summary: MARC21: XSLT links for 776 do not honor UseControlNumber when set to Don't use Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Bibliographic data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If a record has a value in 776$w, this is used for linking even if UseControlNumber is set to Don't use. To test: 1) Make sure UseControlNumber is set to Don't use 2) In Administration > MARC bibliographic frameworks, add field 776 to the editor 2.1) Go to Administration > MARC bibliographic frameworks 2.2) Next to the Default framework, click Actions > MARC structure 2.3) Search for 776 2.4) Next to field 776, click Actions > Edit subfields 2.5) Go to tab t, check the Editor box 2.6) Go to tab w, check the Editor box 2.7) Click Save changes 3) Go to Cataloging and add a new record 4) Fill in the required fields 5) Enter values in 776$t and 776$w 6) Save the record (no need to add items) 7) Go to normal view in staff interface 8) Hover mouse cursor over the link generated for Additional physical formats --> The link uses the control number 9) Open the record in the OPAC 10) Hover mouse cursor over the link generated for Additional physical formats --> The link uses the control number -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 31171] New: Remember user-selected sort in a given session for Purchase Suggestions
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Apr '26

14 Apr '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31171 Bug ID: 31171 Summary: Remember user-selected sort in a given session for Purchase Suggestions Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 21.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: margaret(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Would it be possible to filter by manager or collection or any other sort column, and have Koha remember the settings between actions? It's annoying and slows down work to have to re-sort the list after each action to try to find next title in your list after you do something. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 16063] New: logic from overdue_notice.pl should be moved into a module
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Apr '26

14 Apr '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16063 Bug ID: 16063 Summary: logic from overdue_notice.pl should be moved into a module Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.18 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Command-line Utilities Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: barton(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: robin(a)catalyst.net.nz Large parts of the logic from overdue_notice.pl can and should be moved into a module. This would a) Allow for unit tests b) Allow the code to be shared with other parts of Koha c) De-couple the notice generation and patron debarment functions of overdue_notice.pl d) Fix Bug 2389 - overdue_notices.pl needs a test mode -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 30515] New: Move Overdue transports to patron messaging preferences
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Apr '26

14 Apr '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30515 Bug ID: 30515 Summary: Move Overdue transports to patron messaging preferences Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com The idea of this bug would be to allow patrons to choose which format they would like to receive their overdues in while maintaining at least one selection as mandatory -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 100

[Bug 20962] New: Overhaul to notices
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Apr '26

14 Apr '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20962 Bug ID: 20962 Summary: Overhaul to notices Change sponsored?: Sponsored Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All URL: https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Notices_Overhaul_ RFC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: hughr(a)brimbank.vic.gov.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Deadline: 2018-11-01 Currently notices are run using effectively two separate systems. Overdue notices run using their own cron job, whilst everything else is either queued by the advance_notices cron or directly added to the message queue. Additionally, print overdues are treated differently to other overdues. This means the options available for print overdues considerably lag those available for other notice types, and there are confusing discrepencies between overdues, other notices, and print overdues and everything else. Note that this enhancement is primarily aimed at modernising the way paper (postal) notices are managed, but as part of that it moves overdues under the same structure as other notices. # Step 1 - Move Overdues into member messaging preferences This should allow patrons (or staff on behalf of patrons) to: 1. Select one or more notification methods (SMS, email etc) 2. Choose not to be notified about Overdues at all 3. Choose to receive a digest for overdues # Step 2 - Enable 'postal' as a specific option rather than simply a fallback,for all notice types # Step 3 - option to process all print notices together # Step 4 - extend <item> tags to other circulation notices # Step 5 - Allow for 'digesting' of all notices in queue regardless of type # Step 6 - Allow circulation notices to be created for any item status change More detail is provided in the RFC - once we have community feedback the details may change slightly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 24

[Bug 20475] New: Patrons receiving both email and print overdue notices
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Apr '26

14 Apr '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20475 Bug ID: 20475 Summary: Patrons receiving both email and print overdue notices Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 17.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When attempting to send overdue notices through both email and SMS, a print notice will be generated if *either* email or SMS fails. Ideally, a print notice would only be sent if *both* email and SMS fail. Currently, enabling both email and SMS overdue notices results in patrons receiving a print notice in addition to either email or SMS. To test: 1: Set overdue notices for a given patron category to send in both email and SMS 2: Create a patron in that category with a valid email address but no SMS number 3: Check an item out to the patron and set the due date to a past date that will generate an overdue notice 4: Run notices 5: Confirm that both email and print notices have generated While this bug concerns a specific instance of duplicate notices, overdue notice generation and failover also presents a larger opportunity for increased customizability and clarity. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 14

[Bug 26166] New: Patron verification through SMS one time code
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Apr '26

14 Apr '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26166 Bug ID: 26166 Summary: Patron verification through SMS one time code Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Often we have a patron that will call to do something with their account and cannot because they don't have their card on them or they have lost their card. It would be FANTASTIC if there was a button on the account, for those that have SMS messaging setup, to send them a one-time code that they could read back to us to verify that it is them. I could also see this as a validation process for setting up SMS messaging on the patron (OPAC) side. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 38703] New: Merged patrons should keep the most recent lastseen date
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Apr '26

14 Apr '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38703 Bug ID: 38703 Summary: Merged patrons should keep the most recent lastseen date Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: emily.lamancusa(a)montgomerycountymd.gov QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Let's say a patron has duplicate accounts, account #1 and account #2, with the following data: lastseen Account #1 2024-05-01 Account #2 2024-11-15 Let's say a staff member merges the duplicate accounts and chooses to keep account #1 based on whatever criteria they use to decide. Currently, account #1 would keep its lastseen date of 2024-05-01. Since the lastseen date may be used to determine account retention and automatic renewal, it would make more sense to keep the more recent lastseen date in this case, especially for patrons who use the library relatively infrequently. (As an extreme example, I recently found a patron account in our system that has a lastseen date from 5 years ago yet also still has current checkouts from earlier this year!) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2