February 2018 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 13715] "limit to items available" hides records with multiple items where 1 is not available (checked out) but others are
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Feb '18

20 Feb '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13715 Fiona Borthwick <fiona.borthwick(a)ptfs-europe.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fiona.borthwick@ptfs-europe | |.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 11340] Make the 'print summary' a custom slip/notice
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Feb '18

20 Feb '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11340 Jessie Zairo <jzairo(a)bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jzairo(a)bywatersolutions.com --- Comment #3 from Jessie Zairo <jzairo(a)bywatersolutions.com> --- This is definitely something libraries would like to be able to edit from the Notices and Slips interface in tools. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 8995] Show OpenURL links in OPAC search results
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Feb '18

20 Feb '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8995 Josef Moravec <josef.moravec(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QA Contact| |josef.moravec(a)gmail.com CC| |josef.moravec(a)gmail.com Status|Signed Off |Patch doesn't apply --- Comment #84 from Josef Moravec <josef.moravec(a)gmail.com> --- Patch doesn't apply, please, rebase. Also, we will need pod and test for GetOpenURLResolverURL in C4::Biblio -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 12904] Force browser to load new JavaScript and CSS files after upgrade
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Feb '18

20 Feb '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12904 --- Comment #115 from Kyle M Hall <kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com> --- AFAIK, the reason the former is better then the latter is fairly simple. With the latter ( that is, /my/file.js?version=[% KOHA_VERSION %] ), the file will *never* be cached. It will always be fetched on each page load. Since we would be passing a GET parameter, a modern web browser would assume the contents of the URL may vary based on the parameter, and will assume it shouldn't cache the file. Kyle (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #114) > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #113) > > Could anyone explain (again) why we choose to append the version to the > > filename and not in parameter? > > > > So basically why: > > /my/file_[% KOHA_VERSION %].js > > and not: > > /my/file.js?version=[% KOHA_VERSION %] > > > > Kyle and Martin talked about the two approaches earlier in comments (from > > comment 4) but I do not understand. Please clarify. > > > > It could avoid the rewrite rules. > > From one of the linked sources: > === > But which is better: mylogo.1.2.gif or mylogo.gif?v=1.2? To gain the benefit > of caching by popular proxies, avoid revving with a querystring and instead > rev the filename itself. > === > I am not sure if passing a version as parameter in a script URL would be > good practice. It seems quite uncommon, but I may be wrong? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 12904] Force browser to load new JavaScript and CSS files after upgrade
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Feb '18

20 Feb '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12904 --- Comment #114 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #113) > Could anyone explain (again) why we choose to append the version to the > filename and not in parameter? > > So basically why: > /my/file_[% KOHA_VERSION %].js > and not: > /my/file.js?version=[% KOHA_VERSION %] > > Kyle and Martin talked about the two approaches earlier in comments (from > comment 4) but I do not understand. Please clarify. > > It could avoid the rewrite rules. >From one of the linked sources: === But which is better: mylogo.1.2.gif or mylogo.gif?v=1.2? To gain the benefit of caching by popular proxies, avoid revving with a querystring and instead rev the filename itself. === I am not sure if passing a version as parameter in a script URL would be good practice. It seems quite uncommon, but I may be wrong? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 2454] Improve display of credits on pay fines tab
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Feb '18

20 Feb '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=2454 Josef Moravec <josef.moravec(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |josef.moravec(a)gmail.com Status|Signed Off |Failed QA --- Comment #21 from Josef Moravec <josef.moravec(a)gmail.com> --- Why should be accounttype hidden for credits? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 14784] Missing checkin message for debarred patrons when issuing rules 'fine days = 0'
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Feb '18

20 Feb '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14784 --- Comment #30 from Fridolin SOMERS <fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com> --- It also corrects a small bug, when restriction is infinite, the date "31/12/9999" was displayed in return page. This is because new code always checks for this infinite date and returns message "ForeverDebarred" instead of "PrevDebarred". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14784] Missing checkin message for debarred patrons when issuing rules 'fine days = 0'
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Feb '18

20 Feb '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14784 --- Comment #29 from Fridolin SOMERS <fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com> --- (In reply to David Bourgault from comment #28) > Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83(a)web.de> Is this patch signed off ? Or does it need a second signing ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14784] Missing checkin message for debarred patrons when issuing rules 'fine days = 0'
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Feb '18

20 Feb '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14784 Fridolin SOMERS <fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|unspecified |master -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14784] Missing checkin message for debarred patrons when issuing rules 'fine days = 0'
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Feb '18

20 Feb '18

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14784 Fridolin SOMERS <fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Patch complexity|--- |Small patch CC| |fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.co | |m -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0