October 2019 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 20985] New: CanBookBeReserved and CanItemBeReserved should check 'On shelf holds allowed' policy
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Jul '26

07 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20985 Bug ID: 20985 Summary: CanBookBeReserved and CanItemBeReserved should check 'On shelf holds allowed' policy Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Via ILSDI we use the routines mentioned above to determine holdability, however, neither of these routines check on shelf hold policies -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 93

[Bug 20551] New: Add option for including deleted records in export_records.pl
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Jul '26

07 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20551 Bug ID: 20551 Summary: Add option for including deleted records in export_records.pl Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Command-line Utilities Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: glasklas(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: robin(a)catalyst.net.nz Add an option "--include_deleted" to also include possibly deleted biblios in export. This option can only be used together with --date, and --record-type=biblio. The rational behind this is that use case does not makes much sense (if you are doing a full export, why would you include deleted biblios) and thus some extra complexity can be avoided. Superficially related to https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17693, not really quite different as this includes the whole biblio-record (with record status set to "d" in leader) in the regular export, not just biblio ids. This is a requirement for synchronizing with the discovery-system we are currently using for example and imho is a more standard and MARC-compliant way of supporting export of record deletions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 184

[Bug 17748] New: Show due date and availability in item search results
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Jul '26

06 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17748 Bug ID: 17748 Summary: Show due date and availability in item search results Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff Client Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: christian.stelzenmueller(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com After searching an item, i. e. with barcode, you can't see wheter it is checked out or not. Therefore the due date and / or the availability of the item would be very helpful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 61

[Bug 21453] New: blinddetail-biblio-search.pl/.tt use hardcoded subfield values for MARC21
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jul '26

03 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21453 Bug ID: 21453 Summary: blinddetail-biblio-search.pl/.tt use hardcoded subfield values for MARC21 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: arouss1980(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If you add or alter an authority record and edit one of the MARC fields in UNIMARC 5XX 'See Also Reference Tracing Block' [1], you can click on the ellipsis (...) next to a subfield [2] to launch the authority finder plugin. This plugin allows you to search for an authority and then pick an entry from the 'Special relationship:' dropdown menu in order to set the relationship between the two authorities. The results list of the authority finder contains 'Choose' buttons which _should_ insert all data from the chosen authority into the appropriate subfields of the MARC tag you are editing [3]. However, in UNIMARC setups this does not work: clicking on 'Choose' only populates subfield $a ('Entry Element') with data, but not subfields $3 and $5 ('Authority Record Number' and 'Tracing Control', respectively), which are just as important for correct authority linking. I've tracked this down to these lines of code which are MARC21-specific and use hardcoded subfield values in blinddetail-biblio-search.pl: 91 for ( $field->subfields ) { 92 next if $_->[0] eq '9'; # $9 will be set with authid value 101 push( @subfield_loop, { marc_subfield => 'w', marc_values => $relationship } ) if ( $relationship ); There is also this code in the template blinddetail-biblio-search.tt: 38 [%- END -%]‡9[% authid | html %]"; 138 if(code.value=='9'){ 139 subfield.value = "[% authid |replace("'", "\'") |replace('"', '\"') |replace('\n', '\\n') |replace('\r', '\\r') %]"; These code fragments don't work 100% because in UNIMARC authorities the authid value is stored in subfield $3 and the relationship code in $5. I propose to modify the Perl script above (which is currently MARC flavour agnostic), have it check the 'marcflavour' system preference, and use that to decide which subfield to push the authority relator code to. A similar approach in the template file will set the authid subfield value depending on whether you are a MARC21 or UNIMARC user. [1] Known as the 'Related Access Point Block' in recent IFLA updates. [2] For the ellipsis to appear next to a subfield, you must view the MARC structure of the relevant authority type and then edit the subfields of the tag you're interested in. Finally, you must select an authority type from the 'Thesaurus:' dropdown menu. [3] Under the hood each 'Choose' button is a call to the JS function doauth(), which in turn calls blinddetail-biblio-search.pl with the parameters required (authid, relationship, etc.). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 39

[Bug 23818] New: Acquisitions receipt created when an item or invoice is received.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Jul '26

02 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23818 Bug ID: 23818 Summary: Acquisitions receipt created when an item or invoice is received. Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: new feature Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: rkuiper(a)roundrocktexas.gov QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Add a button on each acquisitions invoice that will print a receipt slip fr each item on the invoice. The slip would contain basic information about the item such as title, author and ISBN (to match item to slip) and then other information such as number of holds, branch for multi-branch systems, nonpublic note (we indicate things like NYTimes Best Seller here), and receipt date. Currently we scan the items when they come in and write things like holds and best seller on a slip of paper with the month of receipt on it. I have attached photos of the slips I have seen to give you an idea of what they contain. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 23258] New: Batch holding
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Jul '26

02 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23258 Bug ID: 23258 Summary: Batch holding Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: matthias.meusburger(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Add a "batch holding" tool (just like batch item modification, batch patron deletion...) This tool would allow to place or cancel holds in batch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 52

[Bug 20573] New: Patron receives membership expiry notice but 'will expire soon' alert doesn't show for staff at checkout
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 01 Jul '26

01 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20573 Bug ID: 20573 Summary: Patron receives membership expiry notice but 'will expire soon' alert doesn't show for staff at checkout Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 17.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jyorio(a)esilibrary.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com We've seen a situation a few times now, where a patron comes into the library and informs the staff that they received notice that their account is going to expire, but when staff go to the patron's account and click checkout, the message, "Attention: Expiration: Patron's card will expire soon. Patron's card expires on ...", doesn't appear. This issue happens when the patron comes into the library exactly 30 days from their expiration. In this case, MembershipExpiryDaysNotice = 30 days and NotifyBorrowerDeparture = 30 days. So for example, the patron's expiration date is 05/11/2018. On 4/11/2018 the patron gets their notice, as expected. They come into the library on 4/11/2018 and the checkout message alerting staff to the impending expiration message doesn't show. Checking the same account on 4/12/2018 shows the message "Attention: Expiration: Patron's card will expire soon. Patron's card expires on 05/11/2018 Renew or Edit Details" on the checkout screen. I would expect the staff to be alerted at checkout on 4/11/2018 since the patron has been notified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 20172] New: Add a search bar in list tables
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 01 Jul '26

01 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20172 Bug ID: 20172 Summary: Add a search bar in list tables Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Lists Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: patrick.robitaille(a)collecto.ca QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Hi, It would be nice to add a search bar fot the tables in the list's module like comme les autres tableaux qui sont diponibles dans les différents module de Koha. This search box will help us when we have a lot of records in a list. It would be useful. It could be a tables like on this page circ/overdue.pl. Patrick. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 14

[Bug 23649] New: Elasticsearch offer an option to weight search results by type
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 01 Jul '26

01 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23649 Bug ID: 23649 Summary: Elasticsearch offer an option to weight search results by type Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com Some libraries would like to be able to prioritize "books" over "large print" , audios, etc in the search results -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 35

[Bug 16631] New: Show groups/categories of reports to authorized staff
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Jun '26

30 Jun '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16631 Bug ID: 16631 Summary: Show groups/categories of reports to authorized staff Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Reports Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org It would be helpful to have reports that are specific groups/categories to be authorized under the reports permissions in a patron account. Not everyone wants to see everyone else's reports, some are similar but are not. Some are for superlibrarians to test, and are not ready for use. It would be great if we could specify groups and even subgroups in the permissions that the staff could access, or specify all groups. All groups should be the norm for a superlibrarian. Christopher -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 261