May 2019 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 19859] New: Add option to return to the search result in authorities
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Jan '25

07 Jan '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19859 Bug ID: 19859 Summary: Add option to return to the search result in authorities Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: patrick.robitaille(a)collecto.ca QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Hi, It is imposible to return to hte result search when you edit an authorities in a record. When we want to edit an authorities in a record, we can clic on the tag editor. That option will open a search page. In this search page you can search authorities. If you clic on edit authorities that action will be open into the authorities module. If you clic on save, you stay in authorities module and you don't return on the search page of the tag editor. Because of that, if you had made some changes in the authoritie, you can't clic on choose for linking to the record. To recreate: Go to a record Edit an authoritie with tag editor Search an authoritie with this plugin Choose an authoritie and clic on edit authorities Clic on Save Notice that you still in the authorities modul and you can’t link this authoritie in your record. For make this link you have to "go back" two times ank clic on choose or make this search another time. Patrick. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 18595] New: Move C4::Members::Messaging to Koha namespace
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Jan '25

06 Jan '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18595 Bug ID: 18595 Summary: Move C4::Members::Messaging to Koha namespace Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: lari.taskula(a)jns.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Bug 17499 adds Koha-objects for messaging preferences. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 159

[Bug 20954] New: Add ability to set syspref overrides in SIP as we can in apache
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20954 Bug ID: 20954 Summary: Add ability to set syspref overrides in SIP as we can in apache Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: SIP2 Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: colin.campbell(a)ptfs-europe.com We should be able to set system preference overrides for SIP in a similar manner that we do in Apache. It would be great if we could specify those overrides on both a config level, and login level basis. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 21

[Bug 19919] New: Writing off a Lost Item Fee marks as "Paid for by patron"
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 26 Dec '24

26 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19919 Bug ID: 19919 Summary: Writing off a Lost Item Fee marks as "Paid for by patron" Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lisetteslatah(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Created attachment 70293 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=70293&action=ed… An example A replacement copy was ordered for an item that was "long lost overdue" on a patron's account. The librarian wanted the old copy deleted from the system to keep the record clean. We checked in the item, marked it as lost, and then wrote off the fee associated with the item. Finally we reapplied the fee manually, no longer associated with the item. We noticed that at the point of the write off, the item gets a line that says paid for by (Patron name and barcode) DATE TIME. This also happens if the book is checked in and no longer marked as lost (say it was returned by the borrower so we wrote off the lost item fee.) The borrower has not paid for the book in either situation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 76

[Bug 15725] New: Merge permission
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 25 Dec '24

25 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15725 Bug ID: 15725 Summary: Merge permission Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: hbraum(a)nekls.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl It would be nice if Koha had a permission to limit access to the merge records option (Merge selected button) on the addbooks.pl search results page and the virtualshelves/shelves.pl page (lists). This is especially important in a consortial catalog environment where many people have cataloging permissions, but most probably shouldn't have the ability to merge records. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 19876] New: Koha::Account->pay() does not exit specific fine loop when balance is used up
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19876 Bug ID: 19876 Summary: Koha::Account->pay() does not exit specific fine loop when balance is used up Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If a patron selects specific fines to pay and enters an amount less than all of those fines the loop will continue through all fines. This can be problematic for lost fines which are not paid or not paid fully as they will be marked 'Paid for...' and returned -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 17138] New: UpdateFine() modyfies existing fine records even when there is no need
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Dec '24

19 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17138 Bug ID: 17138 Summary: UpdateFine() modyfies existing fine records even when there is no need Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: abl(a)biblos.pk.edu.pl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com In C4/Overdues.pm: 574: # we're updating an existing fine. Only modify if amount changed 577: if ( $data->{'amount'} != $amount ) { for some numbers (e.g. 5.60) the comparison in line 577 fails ($data->{'amount'} is decimal(28,6) i.e. a string, and $amount may be a floating point number with no exact binary representation). E.g. when the fine amounts are multiple of 0.20, it fails for the 33.3% of the amounts (on average). Depending on the fine charging settings, this may trigger unnecessary database writes (and a lot of them). If 'Fine Charging Interval' is 1 day, this has very little practical consequences (misc/cronjobs/fines.pl script is usually run once per day, and all fines need an increase anyway). But if the charging interval is longer, e.g. 7 days, in a given day amount changes only for the 1/7 of the fines (again, on average), and over 60% of the database writes would be redundant. To reproduce: 1) run misc/cronjobs/fines.pl 2) add warn "AMOUNT ".$data->{'amount'}." vs $amount"; below line 577 in C4/Overdues.pm 3) run misc/cronjobs/fines.pl again 4) you'll see some warnings like 'AMOUNT 5.600000 vs 5.6' or: dump accountlines table after step 1), run the script 2nd time, dump the table again and compare the contents - some of the records would have a different timestamp. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 38

[Bug 22403] New: Temporary Card
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 18 Dec '24

18 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22403 Bug ID: 22403 Summary: Temporary Card Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- We are CONSTANTLY having to write out patron card numbers on post-its for patrons that forgot their library cards. It would be great if there were an option under the print options on the patron page to print a temporary card. It could print the barcode and number, and maybe have an optional customizable message. Even better, since patrons are prone to leave these lying around, maybe it prints a temporary number that ISN'T their card number, but it is a temporary secondary number linked to their account that expires in X amount of hours. We could hand that out to them, providing of course they provide a photo id to prove who they are. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 11

[Bug 20202] New: Link EDI account to Create Edi order
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Dec '24

12 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20202 Bug ID: 20202 Summary: Link EDI account to Create Edi order Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 17.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cunha(a)monterey.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Currently to send create an EDI order you click "Create EDIFACT order" and are taken to a page to select, if you have multiple EDI accounts, your vendor account from a drop-down menu. It would be great if the Vendor and EDI account could be linked, so there would be no possibility of sending the order to the wrong account. We started with the ByWater beta version of EDI, that was the way it worked in beta. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 17600] New: Standardize the EXPORT
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Dec '24

11 Dec '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17600 Bug ID: 17600 Summary: Standardize the EXPORT Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with the way we export and use subroutines/modules. I tried to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 215