July 2019 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 18747] New: Select All in Add Patron Option in Patron Lists only selects the first 20 entries
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Oct '21

16 Oct '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18747 Bug ID: 18747 Summary: Select All in Add Patron Option in Patron Lists only selects the first 20 entries Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 16.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: karen(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Select all only selects the first 20 records in the Add Patrons option of Patron Lists, even if you change the view to show 50, 100, or all options. The expected behavior is that Select All would select all the options. To recreate this issue, go to Patrons -> Patron Lists -> Select a patron list -> Select Add Patrons in the Action button menu. Next, select 50, 100 or All entries to show. Then, click on Select All. Only the first 20 entries are selected, not all of the entries on the screen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 20

[Bug 21093] New: Problem when using specify due date with fast add
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Oct '21

16 Oct '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21093 Bug ID: 21093 Summary: Problem when using specify due date with fast add Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com When using the specify due date option and then created a fast add, the checkbox "Remember for sesssion" gets automatically checked and even after unchecking it and using "Clean" the date keeps reappearing until you switch to another patron account. To test: - Set the specify due date option to a date, don't check the checkbox - Enter an unknown barcode - Click on fast add - Add a record - Add an item (don't change the barcode!) - The item is checked out to the patron - Verify: The checkbox is "Remember for session" is checked now - Uncheck checkbox and clear the specified date - Check out another item - Verify that the date is back. So there is 2 problems here: - Checkbox should not check itself - it shoudl be able to clear the date -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 22

[Bug 15883] New: Upgrade jQuery from v1.7.2 in the staff client
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Oct '21

15 Oct '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15883 Bug ID: 15883 Summary: Upgrade jQuery from v1.7.2 in the staff client Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Blocks: 14546 In order to upgrade Bootstrap in the staff client we first need to upgrade jQuery. After discussing it some in IRC (http://irc.koha-community.org/koha/2016-02-22#i_1791968) this is the plan I'm working on right now: An initial patch will start by adding the basis for upgrades: 1. Add a new version of doc-head-close.inc which includes new version of jQuery and jQueryUI. That include file will be named doc-head-close-jquery.1.12.0.inc to reflect the version of jQuery it uses. 2. Add the 1.12.0 version of jQuery, naming the file jquery-1.12.0.min.js 3. Add the latest version of jQueryUI, 1.11.4, naming the files jquery-ui-1.11.4.js and jquery-ui-1.11.4.min.css. Subsequent patches can take a page-by-page approach to the upgrade, dropping in the new include file and making any upgrades necessary to Javascript on that page. As compatibility issues are discovered, affected JS files can be re-created with updated file names to reflect the jQuery version, as in "basket-jquery-1.12.0.js" Disadvantages to this method: 1. It's possible some patches will have to touch both doc-head-close.inc and doc-head-close-jquery.1.12.0.inc. However that file changes fairly seldom. 2. git history getting lost between files. Can it be done so that the new include file keeps the history of doc-head-close.inc and doc-head-close.inc is created as if it is the new file? Eventually it could be removed. I would like to hear opinions and suggestions about this. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14546 [Bug 14546] Make staff client use Bootstrap -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 51

[Bug 21932] New: reservetype and reserveexpiration needed for holds (reserves and old_reserves tables)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Oct '21

13 Oct '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21932 Bug ID: 21932 Summary: reservetype and reserveexpiration needed for holds (reserves and old_reserves tables) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 17.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com I see an inherent flaw in the reserves table and process. If a hold is waiting, and someone changes the status from waiting back to a priority level, the waiting status is removed, but the expiration remains. Also, if the hold was a first available hold, it is now changed to an item level hold for the item it was on hold for. I would suggest that a new field be created for the holds table, such as reservetype, and is marked as 'ANY' or 'SPECIFIC'. I would suggest that a new field be created for the reservation expiration called reserveexpiration, separate from the waiting expiration, as to maintain a reservation cutoff date if the status is changed back to a priority level. This would make the expirationdate exclusive to waiting items. I would suggest that when priority level is changed from waiting to a priority level, the reservetype is checked, and if it is marked as ANY, the item number be removed. If it is SPECIFIC, the item number is kept. I would suggest that the expirationdate be cleared if changed from a waiting status to a priority level. I would suggest that all pages that show the "Expiration date" as the reservationexpiration, if exists, or superseded by expirationdate, if exists. No need to have a separate cell for both. I would suggest that when a hold is triggered and marked as waiting, the expiration date is calculated, or limited to the reservationexpiration, whichever is shorter. No sense in holding it longer than the patron was willing to wait for it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 22690] New: Merging problem with records with many items (ElasticSearch)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Oct '21

13 Oct '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22690 Bug ID: 22690 Summary: Merging problem with records with many items (ElasticSearch) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: vitorfernandes87(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Target Milestone: --- When merging records with many items, Koha reindexes the origin record and the destination record for each item moving (check MoveItemFromBiblio in C4::Items). If the record being eliminated has 1000 items, Koha will make 2000 reindexes. Because of this behaviour, the merging is too slow. Test plan: - Create 2 records (one with 1000 items for example) - Add the records to one list and start the merging process of those records. - Choose the record with many items as the one to be eliminated. - Start the merging - After a while the web server should give you a timeout error (the merging process continues) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 253

[Bug 23035] New: Intranet search is slow if thousands of items are in the biblios shown in the search results
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Oct '21

13 Oct '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23035 Bug ID: 23035 Summary: Intranet search is slow if thousands of items are in the biblios shown in the search results Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: joonas.kylmala(a)helsinki.fi Reporter: joonas.kylmala(a)helsinki.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- If you search on intranet for biblios that have in total thousands of items then then the search result will load very very slowly. The slowing down is linear with the amount of items in the bibs. I already tracked this down to a GetAuthorisedValueDesc() call in C4/XSLT.pm. I will start working on a patch for this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 14

[Bug 22964] New: Change "product" language on bugzilla bug report page
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Oct '21

11 Oct '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22964 Bug ID: 22964 Summary: Change "product" language on bugzilla bug report page Change sponsored?: --- Product: Project Infrastructure Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Bugzilla Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: donna(a)kattekrab.net Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 89957 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=89957&action=ed… screenshot of the "select product" text on bugzilla When filing a bug, we see these words: First, you must pick a product on which to enter a bug: Koha: Koha - Free Software ILS Koha security: Security bugs for Koha. Please use this product ONLY if you are reporting a security bug that should be held in confidence prior to the release of a fix. Project Infrastructure: For logging bugs related to the Koha project infrastructure. Not Koha itself. You almost certainly don't want to log a bug here, but under the Koha project. I find "Pick a product" and "Use this product" to be a bit confusing in this context. Here's some alternative phrasing to consider. First, you need to decide where to enter a bug: Koha: Koha Free Software ILS (integrated library system) Koha security: Security bugs for Koha. Use this ONLY if you are reporting a security big that should be held in confidence prior to the release of a fix. Project Infrastructure: Bugs related to the Koha project infrastructure (eg bugzilla, gitlab, or the project website. Not for Koha itself. You almost certainly don't want to log a bug here, but under the Koha project. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 18328] New: There is no history for article request
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Oct '21

11 Oct '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18328 Bug ID: 18328 Summary: There is no history for article request Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: severine.queune(a)bulac.fr QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Il would be useful if the "Cancelled requests" and "Completed requests" of articles request were kept in different tabs, just like it exists for acquisition suggestions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 22829] New: Elasticsearch - some blank subfields cause parsing errors during indexing
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 08 Oct '21

08 Oct '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22829 Bug ID: 22829 Summary: Elasticsearch - some blank subfields cause parsing errors during indexing Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com Target Milestone: --- Some fields in the record cause errors during indexing if they exist but are blank To recreate: 1 - Use the koha sample data or edit a record using the advanced cataloging editor and blank 100$a (probably also shouldn't be allowed) 2 - Save record 3 - Reindex ES 4 - Note you cannot search for the record bug 22828 will show you the error from ES -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 22004] New: When decreaseLoanHighHolds is set to Enable, suspended holds still count in the number of holds
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 08 Oct '21

08 Oct '21

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22004 Bug ID: 22004 Summary: When decreaseLoanHighHolds is set to Enable, suspended holds still count in the number of holds Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 18.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com The system preference decreaseLoanHighHolds if set to enable allows the library to modify the checkout length if a records has X number of holds. Unfortunately, Koha will look at the holds and determine to use this system preference and not discard the suspended holds. For example if a library had this system preference to decrease the loan period if a record has 2 holds on it, if there are 2 holds on the item, but one hold has been suspended, then Koha should not decrease the checkout period - however it does. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3