December 2021 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 26650] New: Add Koha::Object->reset_messages
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Mar '22

09 Mar '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26650 Bug ID: 26650 Summary: Add Koha::Object->reset_messages Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org This method was originally introduced as part of bug 26555. But it was not clear if it was required, or even if some more complex mechanism for marking 'seen' messages is required. I'm leaving this specific patch here for discussing it once someone finds a real need for it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 26651] New: Add Koha::Object->reset_messages
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Mar '22

09 Mar '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26651 Bug ID: 26651 Summary: Add Koha::Object->reset_messages Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org This method was originally introduced as part of bug 26555. But it was not clear if it was required, or even if some more complex mechanism for marking 'seen' messages is required. I'm leaving this specific patch here for discussing it once someone finds a real need for it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 20336] New: Add a generic way for Koha::Object(s) to call logaction as required
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Mar '22

09 Mar '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20336 Bug ID: 20336 Summary: Add a generic way for Koha::Object(s) to call logaction as required Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 23091] New: Restore Forgiven Overdue Fines When Lost Item Returned
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Mar '22

09 Mar '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23091 Bug ID: 23091 Summary: Restore Forgiven Overdue Fines When Lost Item Returned Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 18.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- Bug 22877 is closing a loophole that several libraries have been happily using to achieve their desired fine behavior. These libraries want this behavior: - item accrues overdue fine up to maximum - when item is lost, overdue fine is forgiven and lost fee is applied - when item is returned, lost fee is forgiven and overdue fine is restored So, while many libraries will see bug 22877 as a fix, for some libraries it will be a very big disruption. My understanding of bug 22877 is that we're changing the fine calculation at checkin to not do anything with fines if the item is lost. Maybe we need to instead say don't add fines if the item is lost and the there is an existing fine for that issue where amountoutstanding!=0? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 225

[Bug 28247] New: Add a MARC preview column to to Authority search results table
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Mar '22

09 Mar '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28247 Bug ID: 28247 Summary: Add a MARC preview column to to Authority search results table Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: timothy_alexis.vass(a)ub.lu.se QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We added this and want to make it available for others too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 24

[Bug 29761] New: Patron batch modification tool - duplicated information on the listing page
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Mar '22

07 Mar '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29761 Bug ID: 29761 Summary: Patron batch modification tool - duplicated information on the listing page Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: david(a)davidnind.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Created attachment 128878 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=128878&action=e… Screenshot - duplicate rows if same number entered more than once If a card number or borrower number is entered twice or more (either in the input file or the input form), then each patron with that number is shown twice on the patron batch modification page - see the screenshot. This doesn't affect the end result - you can still successfully update the patron information. It may also not happen very frequently, as you would normally only enter the patron card number or borrower number once. This was identified when testing bug 23291, which adds the SMS number as an option for performing patron batch modifications. Multiple patrons may have the same SMS number. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 23347] New: Columns settings for items in OPAC should be according to the framework
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Mar '22

07 Mar '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23347 Bug ID: 23347 Summary: Columns settings for items in OPAC should be according to the framework Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: marjorie.barry-vila(a)collecto.ca QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Hi, It would be nice to be able to choose which fields of the item would be displayed in the OPAC in the items table, in connection with columns settings holdingst. Regards Marjorie -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 29432] New: Item type deletion should test frameworks
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Mar '22

04 Mar '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29432 Bug ID: 29432 Summary: Item type deletion should test frameworks Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Bibliographic data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Actually the test to allow deleting an item type is : sub can_be_deleted { my ($self) = @_; my $nb_items = Koha::Items->search( { itype => $self->itemtype } )->count; my $nb_biblioitems = Koha::Biblioitems->search( { itemtype => $self->itemtype } )->count; return $nb_items + $nb_biblioitems == 0 ? 1 : 0; } But using item types on biblioitems.itemtype is not mandatory (for items.itype I do not know), so we should test if this DB column is configured in frameworks to use item types. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 20570] New: Add script to complete scanned article requests
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Mar '22

04 Mar '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20570 Bug ID: 20570 Summary: Add script to complete scanned article requests Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Command-line Utilities Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: robin(a)catalyst.net.nz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 25025] New: Drag-and-drop cover image upload
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Mar '22

04 Mar '22

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25025 Bug ID: 25025 Summary: Drag-and-drop cover image upload Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org It would be really nice if the process for adding a local cover image to a title was a simple as dragging the image file into the local cover images tab on the bibliographic detail page. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 18