November 2022 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 23296] New: Auto Renewal Notice does not use Library specific notices
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jun '25

23 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23296 Bug ID: 23296 Summary: Auto Renewal Notice does not use Library specific notices Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 18.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org All notices in Koha are created to be a default ALL libraries notice, however, with branch systems, there is also the ability to create a library specific notice that can be used instead. However, the notice AUTO_RENEWALS is not currently capable of being library specific - instead, the ALL Library Notice for AUTO_RENEWALS is the only one that Koha send. To adjust this, it would be recommended that a library specific notice like all the others in Koha can be created. Following circ control, would be the suggested way to go as with most notices in Koha. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 22

[Bug 30717] New: Date format doesn't change in additem for dateaccessioned
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jun '25

23 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30717 Bug ID: 30717 Summary: Date format doesn't change in additem for dateaccessioned Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 21.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: mengu(a)devinim.com.tr QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Hi, After upgrade from 19.05 to 21.11.04 we got a problem with additem section. dateaccessioned area of additem doesn't seem correctly even we changed dateformat in systempreferences. I've removed the blank in the line var dateformat_pref = "[% Koha.Preference('dateformat') | html %]"; of calendar.inc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 43

[Bug 29522] New: Bib record not correctly updated when merging identical authorities with LinkerModule set to First Match
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jun '25

23 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29522 Bug ID: 29522 Summary: Bib record not correctly updated when merging identical authorities with LinkerModule set to First Match Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 21.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl To recreate: 1 - have LinkerModule set to First Match 2 - have a bib with its author linked to an authority 3 - duplicate that authority, confirm that an authority search for your author brings up two identical authorities, one linked to your bib 4 - merge the two authority records, telling Koha to keep the newer of the two (the one not linked to your bib) 5 - search authorities for your author again, confirm you see just one authority and it's not linked to any bibs 6 - reload your bib, see the 100$9 contains the number for the authority you deleted in the merge 7 - edit your bib to correctly link it to the remaining authority 8 - set LinkerModule to Default 9 - repeat steps 3 and 4 10 - see your remaining authority is linked to your bib, the bib has the correct authority number I'm not able to replicate this in master. I'm not sure what changed from 21.05. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 37

[Bug 29087] New: Holds to pull list can crash with a SQL::Abstract puke
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jun '25

23 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29087 Bug ID: 29087 Summary: Holds to pull list can crash with a SQL::Abstract puke Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Opening the holds to pull list page can crash with the following logged error: SQL::Abstract::puke(): [SQL::Abstract::__ANON__] Fatal: SQL::Abstract before v1.75 used to generate incorrect SQL when the -NOT IN operator was given an undef-containing list: !!!AUDIT YOUR CODE AND DATA!!! (the upcoming Data::Query-based version of SQL::Abstract will emit the logically correct SQL instead of raising this exception) at /usr/share/koha/lib/Koha/Objects.pm line 145 I've traced this to Koha::Holds->get_items_that_can_fill(). Among other things, this routine fetches a list of item types that cannot fill holds, i.e., cases where the 'holdallowed' rule value is 'not_allowed'. However, if your default rule is to not allow holds, the @hold_not_allowed_itypes list will end up including an entry whose value is undef. When passed to the item query, doing the -not_in filter on itype will result in the crash listed above. A quick fix might be to filter out undef from that list. That will fix the crash, but could lead to incorrect results if the default policy is to deny holds for all item types except for ones that are going to be specifically permitted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 56

[Bug 31143] New: We should attempt to fix/identify all cases where '0000-00-00' may still remain in the database
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jun '25

23 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31143 Bug ID: 31143 Summary: We should attempt to fix/identify all cases where '0000-00-00' may still remain in the database Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Database Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org With the move to more and more of Koha using the REST API's and our rest API's being suitably strict about date formats, we need to retrospectively correct occurrences of 0000-00-00 dates appear in database fields system wide. I've had enough occurrences of bad data still in the database after a number of upgrade and it biting me in the UI that I think we should now look at introducing a script to either bulk fix these or at the least identify them and warn they will cause serious issues going forward. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 127

[Bug 25539] New: Remove AddBiblio "defer_marc_save" option
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jun '25

23 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25539 Bug ID: 25539 Summary: Remove AddBiblio "defer_marc_save" option Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: glasklas(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org In bulkmarcimoprt.pl AddBiblio is called with defer_marc_save => 1. This perhaps made sense sometime when items where saved embedded with the MARCXML, but since that is no longer the case(?) there is no need for saving the MARC-data once more after processing items in bulkmarcimport.pl. Thus this option can/should be removed. The current behavior actually blocks bug 14957, we recently discovered, since calling ModBiblioMarc after the record has been saved bypasses marc merge rules on updates (which are applied in ModBiblio) and that save will ignore the possible rules that has been setup. I also discovered some other odd things that will not address in this bug. One of the being that since ModBiblio runs _strip_item_fields no items will ever be imported though bulkmarcimport on updates (but will be in inserts). I'm pretty sure this is the case (have tested and verified, but seems odd this kind of bug has survived undetected for so long). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 106

[Bug 30349] New: cleanup bulkmarcimport.pl
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jun '25

23 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30349 Bug ID: 30349 Summary: cleanup bulkmarcimport.pl Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Bibliographic record staging/import Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: davewood(a)gmx.at QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org the help page of bulkmarcimport.pl doesnt use double dashes for multi-character options. Id like to update the help info and add multi-character options where they are missing. (e.g. --help for -h) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 32

[Bug 29440] New: Refactor/clean up bulkmarcimport.pl
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jun '25

23 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29440 Bug ID: 29440 Summary: Refactor/clean up bulkmarcimport.pl Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: glasklas(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org In order to address various issues with and add some new features to bulkmarcimport.pl I found it necessary to first clean up the script. At our library we run a modified version of bulkmarcimport.pl that for practical reasons was squashed into one commit. I have split this commit into various feature branches, all which depends on the clean up version of the script. So in the first commit of this issue I tried to isolate all the changes that should not affect current script behavior and are mostly related to code formatting, structure and optimizations. The next commits (for this issue) will contain changes that do affect script behavior, but that I would argue should be the default behavior and where the current could be considered confusing and/or buggy. I will later create new related issues for the newly added features mentioned above (and it's possible there is stuff in this patch that should have been broken out and I have overlooked). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 132

[Bug 29510] New: objects.find should call search_limited if present
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jun '25

23 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29510 Bug ID: 29510 Summary: objects.find should call search_limited if present Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: REST API Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 19

[Bug 28664] New: One should not be able to issue a refund against a VOID accountline
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jun '25

23 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28664 Bug ID: 28664 Summary: One should not be able to issue a refund against a VOID accountline Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com, kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com, sally.healey(a)cheshiresharedservices.gov.uk, testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org, tomascohen(a)gmail.com Depends on: 27971 Blocks: 13985 When adding the VOID account line type in bug 27971 I neglected to update the logic for the display of the 'Issue refund' button on the patron transactions page. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13985 [Bug 13985] Cash Management - Koha as 'Point of Sale' https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27971 [Bug 27971] The VOID method should be updated to respect double-entry accounting -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 30