December 2022 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 30529] New: Allow all item fields to be set in MARCItemFieldsToOrder
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Jul '26

16 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30529 Bug ID: 30529 Summary: Allow all item fields to be set in MARCItemFieldsToOrder Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The MARCItemFieldsToOrder syspref allows values for a set list of item/order fields to be sent in MARC file used in acquisitions. We should broaden that out to include any item field to support a broader array of workflows. Bug 24334 already suggested adding barcode, but I see no reason not to take that idea further. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 20253] New: Optionally use buyer's purchase order number from Edifact quote in basketname
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Jul '26

16 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20253 Bug ID: 20253 Summary: Optionally use buyer's purchase order number from Edifact quote in basketname Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: colin.campbell(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Current default behaviour is to use the filename of the QUOTE in the basketname. This would instead use the buyer's purchase order number (segment RFF with a qualifier ON) instead so that this would be searchable. This should be optional as even when supplied many (most) sites do not have meaningful or distinctive data in the field (e.g. 'Books for branch X'). Logical is to add it as a vendor option -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 117

[Bug 26355] New: Tie account renewals to patron modification requests
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Jul '26

16 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26355 Bug ID: 26355 Summary: Tie account renewals to patron modification requests Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Allow patrons renewal reminders to link to the patron modification requests, asking them to review their information and make any any necessary updates if necessary, but acknowledging that the information is up to date. Create a check-box stating that they have reviewed all their information, and it is accurate and up to date (if no changes are made). Perhaps this check-box only shows when their account is due for renewal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 256

[Bug 26261] New: Split calendar.inc into include file and JavaScript file
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Jul '26

16 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26261 Bug ID: 26261 Summary: Split calendar.inc into include file and JavaScript file Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 21156 Now that we have JavaScript internationalization there's no need to have strings defined in an include file like calendar.inc. I propose that we trim calendar.inc down to only those things which require template processing and move the rest of the JavaScript into its own JS file. This would allow us to do proper linting and allow browsers to cache the file. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21156 [Bug 21156] Internationalization: plural forms, context, and more for JS files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 18410] New: Koha should use cool URIs
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 16 Jul '26

16 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18410 Bug ID: 18410 Summary: Koha should use cool URIs Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: pablo.bianchi(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Right now Koha use a very volatile URI scheme. If we seek having not ephemeral URIs they should be completely different. Take a look to this article from 1998 of a guy called Tim Berners-Lee: "Cool URIs don't change" https://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI A normal Koha URI looks like this: https://catalog.bywatersolutions.com/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumb… This URI is doomed to die in the short term, is not designed thinking in long-term. We have a lot of information about the tools and technical things used to put it there, like "cgi-bin", "koha" and "pl". Is not even consistent about using always en_US (american English): "/cgi-bin/koha/cataloguing/addbooks.pl" (cataloguing != cataloging). As the article say we shouldn't forget about domain name. We could encourage the use of more permanent words like "catalog" for the host part of the FQDN. PS: This may be related to the robust RESTful URI. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 25667] New: Add field for items.notforloan_on to record when a notforloan status is applied
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Jul '26

15 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25667 Bug ID: 25667 Summary: Add field for items.notforloan_on to record when a notforloan status is applied Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Database Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We record lost_on and damaged_on. Can we record notforloan_on, too? It'd be helpful for various reports. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 14

[Bug 32327] New: When replacing bib record via z39.50, only 1 ISBN should be searched and it should be normalized
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Jul '26

14 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32327 Bug ID: 32327 Summary: When replacing bib record via z39.50, only 1 ISBN should be searched and it should be normalized Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrewfh(a)dubcolib.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl The replace via z39.50 function pre-populates the z39.50 search form with values from the existing bib. Koha just pastes in the contents of biblioitems.isbn, which means it very often pre-populates that field with a value that will never find anything. If the existing record has more than 1 ISBN, the prepopulated form will list them all, pipe-separated. This search will always return no results, even when either ISBN returns results successfully on its own. If the existing record contains a parenthetical note about binding, that search will generally fail as well. We should only put the first ISBN from the record into the search form and we should strip out any binding note or other fluff. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 28915] New: MARC Modification Templates should allow specification of a position or range within a control field
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Jul '26

13 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28915 Bug ID: 28915 Summary: MARC Modification Templates should allow specification of a position or range within a control field Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When dealing with the MARC Leader, 008, and other fixed length control fields, it would be nice to be able to make the modification templates look at, match on, and alter only a specific position or range. For example, suppose I have several records in which I want to change the 008 position 33 (Literary form) from a 0 to a 1 (nonfiction to fiction). Currently I could tell my modification template to update the 008 of every record I point it at where the character in position 33 is a 0 (using regex to match only that specific character). But then there's no way to change ONLY that character and preserve the rest of the field. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 144

[Bug 23988] New: When replace record with z39.50, give option on what gets pre-populated
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Jul '26

12 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23988 Bug ID: 23988 Summary: When replace record with z39.50, give option on what gets pre-populated Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Currently in Koha, when a user chooses to replace an existing record with another record using z39.50, Koha will prepopulate the z39.50 search with Title, Author and ISBN. This search is very constrictive and it would be nice to have the option of what fields get prepopulated instead of having to manually remove the fields that the user doesn't want. Specifically, an ISBN pre-population would be ideal for a library. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 22232] New: Advanced Cataloguing Editor (Rancor) to edit authority records?
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Jul '26

12 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22232 Bug ID: 22232 Summary: Advanced Cataloguing Editor (Rancor) to edit authority records? Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: new feature Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: clopez(a)dml.vic.edu.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Target Milestone: --- Dear colleagues How hard would it be to allow Rancor to edit authority records? Regards, Carlos Lopez Dalton McCaughey Library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 35