January 2023 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 22994] New: Elasticsearch ability import mappings and facets settings
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22994 Bug ID: 22994 Summary: Elasticsearch ability import mappings and facets settings Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: black23(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 21

[Bug 24807] New: Add "year" type to improve sorting by publication date
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Sep '26

02 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24807 Bug ID: 24807 Summary: Add "year" type to improve sorting by publication date Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: glasklas(a)gmail.com When sorting on date-of-publication (a year, field 008, positions 7-10), the current behavior when the field contains an invalid year (containing word characters like "uuuu" or just whitespace), these results appear first when sorting in descending order. Invalid values like these should really not be indexed at all. If so (having null values instead) they will always appear last when sorting, regardless of sort order. This fix adds a "year" search field type, that will reject any non-year values, resulting in a more user friendly sorting behavior. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 70

[Bug 23333] New: Course Reserves: Instuctor search box positioning
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Sep '26

02 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23333 Bug ID: 23333 Summary: Course Reserves: Instuctor search box positioning Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff Client Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: claire_gravely(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Created attachment 91567 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=91567&action=ed… Screenshot When creating a new course in the course reserves module the "Instructor search" box is oddly positioned. Perhaps it could be moved more in line with 'Instructors'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 22456] New: Customers Cancelling their Pending Holds
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Sep '26

02 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22456 Bug ID: 22456 Summary: Customers Cancelling their Pending Holds Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 18.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: christofer.zorn(a)ajaxlibrary.ca QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- Good morning! I'm not sure if I should have piggybacked this off of the previous ticket, but I'd like to open the discussion on bug 18856 again. We'd like the ability to have patrons cancel their holds once they have been pulled by staff and are awaiting pick up. Our previous catalogue (Bibliocommons) allowed the cancellation of holds once it as captured. This feature was well like and used by our patrons who had determined they didn't need/want the item any longer. This gave the perception that they were freeing up the item for the next person. We have fielded a number of grumpy comments since our migration about the inability to perform this functionality. >From my perspective, if we're allowing patrons to place holds and cancel them before they're captured, we should offer the ability to cancel them up until they're picked up. At the very least, this should be a system option to allow the Library to choose whether they'd like to enable this functionality. Even if the implemented functionality is a placebo for the user ... offer them the ability to cancel the hold and have it remove from their account. As long as optically it appears they've cancelled the hold, there is no harm. If desired, a report could be run to allow staff to pull those items from the shelf if needed. I'm more than happy to elaborate if needed on this, but I feel that this is a feature that is currently missing from Koha that would be a boon to customer service. Thanks Christofer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 166

[Bug 30557] New: Add ability to create Item lists
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Sep '26

02 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30557 Bug ID: 30557 Summary: Add ability to create Item lists Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 21.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Lists Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: estherm(a)sodaspringsid.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl This is relevant for multi-branch installations. Lists currently appear to be primarily bibliographic lists. This creates a problem when sorting lists by call number. In this scenario there may be multiple items from different libraries using different call number schema attached to a single bibliographic record. The list cannot be sorted accurately by call number. It would be helpful if there was an option for an item based list. In this scenario items are added to a list for a specific branch. The call number sort will then sort correctly because the call number schema will be consistent for the branch. An item list would display the same information as a bibliographic list with the exception of additional branches which may also have the item. A typical use case would a library creating an item list, sort by call number, and then use that list to go to the shelf to pull the items in order. This is currently not possible in a multi-branch installation without a bit of work. It would require downloading the list and then cleaning up the list to be useful for this kind of work. It may be possible to create a report that will do this, but it would be a nice added functionality in the List tool. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 117

[Bug 18062] New: Damaged Status shows unavilable in results
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Sep '26

02 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18062 Bug ID: 18062 Summary: Damaged Status shows unavilable in results Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 3.22 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: jzairo(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When performing a search in the OPAC or staff client and the results include an item that is marked "Damaged" the status shows unavailable on the results page. When you view the detailed view of the record, the item appears as available. Although the item can still be checked out, it is confusing for the patron when they see the unavailable status. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 30319] New: Patron self-modification values not retained if field blocked in PatronSelfRegistrationBorrowerUnwantedField
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Sep '26

02 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30319 Bug ID: 30319 Summary: Patron self-modification values not retained if field blocked in PatronSelfRegistrationBorrowerUnwantedField Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When a field is hidden for self-registration, Koha is mistakenly discarding values for that field in self-modification. Somehow these two sysprefs are not being enforced distinctly. To test: 1 - turn on OPACPatronDetails 2 - confirm PatronSelfModificationBorrowerUnwantedField is blank, all fields allowed 3 - set PatronSelfRegistrationBorrowerUnwantedField to hide Title 4 - log into the opac, go to self mod (/cgi-bin/koha/opac-memberentry.pl), set a title (it is not hidden, which is correct), and save your updates 5 - go to the patron modification page in the staff interface (/cgi-bin/koha/members/members-update.pl), confirm your modification request is there but shows no changes 6 - update PatronSelfRegistrationBorrowerUnwantedField to allow title 7 - repeat step 4 8 - your new modification request shows a change to title -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 23817] New: Searching by patron phone number is contingent on how it was entered
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 01 Sep '26

01 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23817 Bug ID: 23817 Summary: Searching by patron phone number is contingent on how it was entered Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 18.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com If a library chooses to enter their patron phone numbers in as xxx-xxx-xxxx when creating the patron record; then when the phone number is searched with the filters, the library must always use hyphens when searching or the search will not work. It would be nice that the number could be searched in the filters with either hyphens or no hyphens and the library would get the same results. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 65

[Bug 17921] New: Shelf Browser does not take OpacSuppression or OpacHiddenItems into consideration
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 01 Sep '26

01 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17921 Bug ID: 17921 Summary: Shelf Browser does not take OpacSuppression or OpacHiddenItems into consideration Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Items that shouldn't be displayed in the OPAC are displayed in the shelf browser The links work as expected (redirect to opac-blocked or 404) but we should not display them in the first place -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 20

[Bug 26866] New: Items table on additem should sort by cn_sort
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 01 Sep '26

01 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26866 Bug ID: 26866 Summary: Items table on additem should sort by cn_sort Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff Client Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com To recreate: - create a bib - add three items with source of classification LCC, call numbers: -- JC43 .G6 1890 -- JC330 .F74 2000 -- JC480 .R63 2006 - on additem.pl, sort the items table by "Full call number" - notice items are order incorrectly, going 330, 43, 480 - use a report to pull the cn_sort values for your 3 items, confirm that ordering by cn_sort in your report correctly orders them 43, 330, 480 We should use cn_sort here to get them in the correct order. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 18