March 2023 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 33259] New: Optionally set SameSite attribute of cookie to Strict
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '26

14 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33259 Bug ID: 33259 Summary: Optionally set SameSite attribute of cookie to Strict Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Authentication Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: aleisha(a)catalyst.net.nz QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: dpavlin(a)rot13.org https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Set-Cookie/SameSi… We should offer a system preference so that libraries who'd like to increase their security can set the SameSite attribute of the session cookie to Strict, rather than the default Lax. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 103

[Bug 25586] New: Something wrong with KOHA_HOME
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '26

14 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25586 Bug ID: 25586 Summary: Something wrong with KOHA_HOME Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Packaging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: mirko(a)abunchofthings.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 20

[Bug 25465] New: Batch delete records based on imported MARC batch
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Oct '26

13 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25465 Bug ID: 25465 Summary: Batch delete records based on imported MARC batch Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Various vendors send libraries batches of MARC records for deletion -- these are records the library already has in their system that should be deleted as the vendor no longer offers them. Right now we can: - stage the batch for import using a matching rule - run a report to return matched biblionumbers - batch delete based on the report output It'd be great to streamline this. My two thoughts are either we could add a new option to batch record deletion to allow use of an imported file to identify records OR we could add a new matching behavior of "delete matched record" to the batch staging tool. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 32652] New: Standardize slots selection between staff interface and opac
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Oct '26

13 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32652 Bug ID: 32652 Summary: Standardize slots selection between staff interface and opac Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: koha(a)univ-lyon3.fr QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Hi, Now that thanks to BZ31265, we have nice slots selection for the curbside pickups at OPAC, it would be nice to have the same in the staff interface. It's quite disturbing to have a different way to count the pickup (number of pickup already taken in staff interface and number left in OPAC). And it would be more intuitive to have radio button to select a slot. Thanks, Sonia -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 23

[Bug 23682] New: Add ability to manually import EDI invoices as an alternative to automatic importing on download
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 13 Oct '26

13 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23682 Bug ID: 23682 Summary: Add ability to manually import EDI invoices as an alternative to automatic importing on download Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Some library would like to delay the importing of invoices until a time of their choosing. The invoices should be imported into the database as they do now, but the invoice processing should be skipped. Instead, any invoice file with a status of 'new' should have an 'Import' button to process the invoice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 32

[Bug 29033] New: Add C4::Context->multivalue_preference
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 12 Oct '26

12 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29033 Bug ID: 29033 Summary: Add C4::Context->multivalue_preference Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org I've seen many places in which a syspref is read, and then split used to convert the contents into a list. It seems it would be simple to add a method to do that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 46

[Bug 31430] New: Add column configuration to tables in vendor search
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Oct '26

09 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31430 Bug ID: 31430 Summary: Add column configuration to tables in vendor search Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org It would be nice if we could select which columns to display in the tables shown in vendor search. It might also be nice to have the option to filter and export, but as they would take up some space, it might be discussable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 28989] New: Allow viewing systempreferences only
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Oct '26

09 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28989 Bug ID: 28989 Summary: Allow viewing systempreferences only Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com See bug 28882. It might be helpful if we could distinguish between viewing sysprefs and changing them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 22439] New: Duplicated code in PrepHostMarcField and prepare_host_field
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Oct '26

09 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22439 Bug ID: 22439 Summary: Duplicated code in PrepHostMarcField and prepare_host_field Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pasi.kallinen(a)koha-suomi.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Target Milestone: --- The C4/Biblio.pm subroutines PrepHostMarcField and prepare_host_field both do the same thing, so should be merged. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 64

[Bug 21453] New: blinddetail-biblio-search.pl/.tt use hardcoded subfield values for MARC21
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Oct '26

09 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21453 Bug ID: 21453 Summary: blinddetail-biblio-search.pl/.tt use hardcoded subfield values for MARC21 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: arouss1980(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If you add or alter an authority record and edit one of the MARC fields in UNIMARC 5XX 'See Also Reference Tracing Block' [1], you can click on the ellipsis (...) next to a subfield [2] to launch the authority finder plugin. This plugin allows you to search for an authority and then pick an entry from the 'Special relationship:' dropdown menu in order to set the relationship between the two authorities. The results list of the authority finder contains 'Choose' buttons which _should_ insert all data from the chosen authority into the appropriate subfields of the MARC tag you are editing [3]. However, in UNIMARC setups this does not work: clicking on 'Choose' only populates subfield $a ('Entry Element') with data, but not subfields $3 and $5 ('Authority Record Number' and 'Tracing Control', respectively), which are just as important for correct authority linking. I've tracked this down to these lines of code which are MARC21-specific and use hardcoded subfield values in blinddetail-biblio-search.pl: 91 for ( $field->subfields ) { 92 next if $_->[0] eq '9'; # $9 will be set with authid value 101 push( @subfield_loop, { marc_subfield => 'w', marc_values => $relationship } ) if ( $relationship ); There is also this code in the template blinddetail-biblio-search.tt: 38 [%- END -%]‡9[% authid | html %]"; 138 if(code.value=='9'){ 139 subfield.value = "[% authid |replace("'", "\'") |replace('"', '\"') |replace('\n', '\\n') |replace('\r', '\\r') %]"; These code fragments don't work 100% because in UNIMARC authorities the authid value is stored in subfield $3 and the relationship code in $5. I propose to modify the Perl script above (which is currently MARC flavour agnostic), have it check the 'marcflavour' system preference, and use that to decide which subfield to push the authority relator code to. A similar approach in the template file will set the authid subfield value depending on whether you are a MARC21 or UNIMARC user. [1] Known as the 'Related Access Point Block' in recent IFLA updates. [2] For the ellipsis to appear next to a subfield, you must view the MARC structure of the relevant authority type and then edit the subfields of the tag you're interested in. Finally, you must select an authority type from the 'Thesaurus:' dropdown menu. [3] Under the hood each 'Choose' button is a call to the JS function doauth(), which in turn calls blinddetail-biblio-search.pl with the parameters required (authid, relationship, etc.). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 42