October 2024 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 32419] New: Show availability in list view in staff interface
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Sep '26

09 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32419 Bug ID: 32419 Summary: Show availability in list view in staff interface Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff interface Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com When viewing a list on the OPAC, you can see the item's availability. But in the staff interface, this information is not visible. To test : 1. In the staff interface, add an item to a list 2. View the list --> No availability is visible 3. Go to the OPAC and view the list --> You can see the availability of the item -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 31

[Bug 21453] New: blinddetail-biblio-search.pl/.tt use hardcoded subfield values for MARC21
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Sep '26

09 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21453 Bug ID: 21453 Summary: blinddetail-biblio-search.pl/.tt use hardcoded subfield values for MARC21 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: arouss1980(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org If you add or alter an authority record and edit one of the MARC fields in UNIMARC 5XX 'See Also Reference Tracing Block' [1], you can click on the ellipsis (...) next to a subfield [2] to launch the authority finder plugin. This plugin allows you to search for an authority and then pick an entry from the 'Special relationship:' dropdown menu in order to set the relationship between the two authorities. The results list of the authority finder contains 'Choose' buttons which _should_ insert all data from the chosen authority into the appropriate subfields of the MARC tag you are editing [3]. However, in UNIMARC setups this does not work: clicking on 'Choose' only populates subfield $a ('Entry Element') with data, but not subfields $3 and $5 ('Authority Record Number' and 'Tracing Control', respectively), which are just as important for correct authority linking. I've tracked this down to these lines of code which are MARC21-specific and use hardcoded subfield values in blinddetail-biblio-search.pl: 91 for ( $field->subfields ) { 92 next if $_->[0] eq '9'; # $9 will be set with authid value 101 push( @subfield_loop, { marc_subfield => 'w', marc_values => $relationship } ) if ( $relationship ); There is also this code in the template blinddetail-biblio-search.tt: 38 [%- END -%]‡9[% authid | html %]"; 138 if(code.value=='9'){ 139 subfield.value = "[% authid |replace("'", "\'") |replace('"', '\"') |replace('\n', '\\n') |replace('\r', '\\r') %]"; These code fragments don't work 100% because in UNIMARC authorities the authid value is stored in subfield $3 and the relationship code in $5. I propose to modify the Perl script above (which is currently MARC flavour agnostic), have it check the 'marcflavour' system preference, and use that to decide which subfield to push the authority relator code to. A similar approach in the template file will set the authid subfield value depending on whether you are a MARC21 or UNIMARC user. [1] Known as the 'Related Access Point Block' in recent IFLA updates. [2] For the ellipsis to appear next to a subfield, you must view the MARC structure of the relevant authority type and then edit the subfields of the tag you're interested in. Finally, you must select an authority type from the 'Thesaurus:' dropdown menu. [3] Under the hood each 'Choose' button is a call to the JS function doauth(), which in turn calls blinddetail-biblio-search.pl with the parameters required (authid, relationship, etc.). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 40

[Bug 30144] New: Add support for EDI GIR:LVT, Servicing instructions, segment
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Sep '26

09 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30144 Bug ID: 30144 Summary: Add support for EDI GIR:LVT, Servicing instructions, segment Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We allow for free text instructions in the EDI FTX segment now, taken from the vendor notes field. But this is at the order level, it would be helpful to add support for the LVT segment at the line level. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 122

[Bug 37477] New: Add option to override warm-up/cool-down periods on bookings at booking time
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Sep '26

09 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37477 Bug ID: 37477 Summary: Add option to override warm-up/cool-down periods on bookings at booking time Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Depends on: 34440 We add the option to specify lead and trail times on bookings in bug 34440. It would be a nice addition to add the option for some users to opt to override the rules at booking time in some cases. Example; You add a trial time rule of 3 days which should account for tardy patrons in your organisation returning the items at the end of their booking period. However, you're making a booking for a patron who you trust to return the book on time so you want to, in this case, allow an override to reduce the trail time. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34440 [Bug 34440] Add warm-up and cool-down periods to bookings -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 37618] New: Select patron's, then item's home library by default for pickup location when creating bookings
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Sep '26

09 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37618 Bug ID: 37618 Summary: Select patron's, then item's home library by default for pickup location when creating bookings Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: paul.derscheid(a)lmscloud.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com When working with many bookings per day, always selecting the pickup location can become cumbersome. I'd suggest using the patron's home library as a preselection within the pickup library field in the bookings creation modal and to fall back onto the item's home library if the patron's home library is not available. Would you also consider this a sane default? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 31

[Bug 36509] New: Add option to search authority records by ID
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Sep '26

09 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36509 Bug ID: 36509 Summary: Add option to search authority records by ID Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: aleisha(a)catalyst.net.nz QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 37449] New: Authority matching using Elasticsearch on 'Number' fields fails
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Sep '26

09 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37449 Bug ID: 37449 Summary: Authority matching using Elasticsearch on 'Number' fields fails Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl The query created for authority search always uses `.ci_raw`.. but that doesn't exist for all search field types, including 'Number'. Fridolin added ci_raw for type 'Std Number' in bug 31695 because of this, but I'm not sure that's the right approach globally. We found this when attempting to add a 001 match rule.. local-number defaults to type 'Number' and this never matches anything because 'Number' doesn't include a ci_raw to search against. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 37762] New: Expand ILL to allow for Supplying Agency/Lending Library workflows
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Sep '26

09 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37762 Bug ID: 37762 Summary: Expand ILL to allow for Supplying Agency/Lending Library workflows Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lisette(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com, tomascohen(a)gmail.com Currently Koha's ILL module allows for the Koha library to be a borrowing library/institution but does not currently allow for the Koha library to be a supplying agency/lending library. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 114

[Bug 36893] New: Shibboleth Login not honouring branch selector
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Sep '26

09 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36893 Bug ID: 36893 Summary: Shibboleth Login not honouring branch selector Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 22.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Authentication Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: ryan.henderson(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: dpavlin(a)rot13.org A client of ours has recently installed Shibboleth SSO into their staff client. They have asked us to help honour the branch selector on the staff login screen but Shibboleth is ignoring this from what we can see and is only logging staff into their default branches. We think this would be a nice enhancement to the authentication module, to help people login to their requested branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 33277] New: Correctly handle linking subfields with no defined thesaurus
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 09 Sep '26

09 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33277 Bug ID: 33277 Summary: Correctly handle linking subfields with no defined thesaurus Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Authority data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org This is a follow-up to bug 33159, which is a followup to bug 30280 Currently we are handling all subfield other than 6XX as if they are lcsh - this doesn't work in all scenarios. When a record has 008 character 11 =n - "Not applicable" the match won't go through -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 100