November 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 31503] New: Groundwork for 20380 (mail consent)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31503 Bug ID: 31503 Summary: Groundwork for 20380 (mail consent) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 170

[Bug 31533] New: Add opt-in/opt-out flags to patron consents
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31533 Bug ID: 31533 Summary: Add opt-in/opt-out flags to patron consents Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Part of the 20380 set. Building on top of 31503. While we now only enforce the GDPR consent if the pref is set to Enforced, we leave other consents empty. Which actually is opt-in. They need to go to the consents page and enable the specific consent. If we would add opt-out, we can either add consents for all users or make PatronConsent a bit smarter and only register refusal (opt-out). It feels more consistent to add all consents to the table, and add them too in the self reg process. But when you add a new consent type and mark it as opt-out, we should then populate the table too. Do we also need a Mandatory flag? Historically, we treat the GDPR consent as such. Other consents may not be of that same category. But we might want the user to make an explicit choice there without the same exceptional approach that we use for GDPR. How do we get him on that page? If he arrives there, we can obviously allow saving only when those mandatories are filled.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 30968] New: opac-authorites-home.pl still accessible even when OpacAuthorities system preference is turned off
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30968 Bug ID: 30968 Summary: opac-authorites-home.pl still accessible even when OpacAuthorities system preference is turned off Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 21.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: wizzyrea(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When the system preference OpacAuthorities is turned off, the page https://your.library.here/cgi-bin/koha/opac-authorities-home.pl is still accessible and likely shouldn't be. To test: set OpacAuthorities to Don't Allow try to visit https://your.library.here/cgi-bin/koha/opac-authorities-home.pl note that the page is still accessible. Thanks for checking it out! Liz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 39669] New: Update reserves notices to use Koha::Patron->queue_notice
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 31 Jan '26

31 Jan '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39669 Bug ID: 39669 Summary: Update reserves notices to use Koha::Patron->queue_notice Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)openfifth.co.uk QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Blocks: 37214 This is one of the more challenging cases as C4::Reservers supports Digests and thus uses C4::Message. It would be a good one to build out tests for and enhance the Koha::Patron->enqueue_notice message, allowing for more adoption of messaging preferences and digest functionality. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37214 [Bug 37214] We should migrate to Koha::Patron->queue_notice wherever possible -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 39176] New: Update additional_field_values.record_id to varchar(255)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 31 Jan '26

31 Jan '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39176 Bug ID: 39176 Summary: Update additional_field_values.record_id to varchar(255) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org In bug 38663 we had to switch from int(11) to varchar(11) so we could properly store branchcode, the primary key for the branches table. In bug 38457 I'm now faced with the same issue of needing to update the field from varchar(11) to varchar(80) to allow for the code field in the account_debit_types table which is a varchar(80) primary key. Looking to the future and how we're starting to add more and more uses of additional fields I think we should pick the largest current primary key field and match that. SELECT t.TABLE_NAME AS table_name, k.COLUMN_NAME AS primary_key_field, CASE WHEN k.CHARACTER_MAXIMUM_LENGTH IS NOT NULL THEN CONCAT(k.DATA_TYPE, '(', k.CHARACTER_MAXIMUM_LENGTH, ')') WHEN k.NUMERIC_PRECISION IS NOT NULL THEN CONCAT(k.DATA_TYPE, '(', k.NUMERIC_PRECISION, ')') ELSE k.DATA_TYPE END AS primary_key_type FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES t JOIN INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS k ON t.TABLE_NAME = k.TABLE_NAME AND t.TABLE_SCHEMA = k.TABLE_SCHEMA JOIN INFORMATION_SCHEMA.KEY_COLUMN_USAGE ku ON t.TABLE_NAME = ku.TABLE_NAME AND t.TABLE_SCHEMA = ku.TABLE_SCHEMA AND k.COLUMN_NAME = ku.COLUMN_NAME JOIN INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS tc ON ku.TABLE_NAME = tc.TABLE_NAME AND ku.TABLE_SCHEMA = tc.TABLE_SCHEMA AND ku.CONSTRAINT_NAME = tc.CONSTRAINT_NAME WHERE t.TABLE_SCHEMA = DATABASE() AND tc.CONSTRAINT_TYPE = 'PRIMARY KEY' ORDER BY t.TABLE_NAME; Using the above query, I believe that shows the largest is a varchar(255). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 24288] New: Add wording to authorized value interface to indicate valid code length
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Jan '26

30 Jan '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24288 Bug ID: 24288 Summary: Add wording to authorized value interface to indicate valid code length Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Several standard authorized values feed into fields that require a single character code (LOST, NOTFORLOAN, DAMAGED, RESTRICTED, WITHDRAWN). It'd be good to have some wording in the authorized value interface that would indicate this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 29

[Bug 23861] New: Add authorised value categories description option
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Jan '26

30 Jan '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23861 Bug ID: 23861 Summary: Add authorised value categories description option Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com I really like the way the authorised values page looks now. I think it's much more user friendly with the descriptions and the categories all laid out and not in a drop-down. Right now, the descriptions for each category are "hardcoded" in the template. Would it be feasible to move those in the DB? That way, when we add new categories, we would be able to add our own description. For example, if I add a category for RDA media type, I would be able to add a description saying it's meant to be used with 337$a. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 14

[Bug 27512] New: Block creation of invalid authorised values for LOST, NOTFORLOAN, DAMAGED, RESTRICTED, and WITHDRAWN
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Jan '26

30 Jan '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27512 Bug ID: 27512 Summary: Block creation of invalid authorised values for LOST, NOTFORLOAN, DAMAGED, RESTRICTED, and WITHDRAWN Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Several authorised value categories have inherent limits on what values can be used. Bug 24288 adds text to the screen to tell you about these limits, but doesn't enforce them. It'd be good to just stop a user from saving a value that won't work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 36067] New: Inconsistencies in --commit, --confirm for command line scrips
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Jan '26

30 Jan '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36067 Bug ID: 36067 Summary: Inconsistencies in --commit, --confirm for command line scrips Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Command-line Utilities Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: robin(a)catalyst.net.nz Our scripts have a mix of --commit and --confirm to 'actually do the job'. I think we should try to be consistent here.. with the most backward compatible option being to make them synonyms in each script. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 16

[Bug 37669] New: Add 'auto_account_expired' to AUTO_RENEWALS_DGST
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Jan '26

30 Jan '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37669 Bug ID: 37669 Summary: Add 'auto_account_expired' to AUTO_RENEWALS_DGST Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: r.delahunty(a)arts.ac.uk QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We added the account expired error to our digest and find it useful. [% ELSIF checkout.auto_renew_error == 'auto_account_expired' %] [% checkout.item.biblio.title %] (barcode: [% checkout.item.barcode %]) could not be renewed as your account has expired. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2