November 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 41081] New: Link from 856$u points to http://%20%20%20%20
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Jul '26

22 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41081 Bug ID: 41081 Summary: Link from 856$u points to http://%20%20%20%20 Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl http://%20%20%20%20 We should not provide such useless links. The field only contained four spaces. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 17

[Bug 34460] New: Patron category should regulate if account can have permissions
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Jul '26

22 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34460 Bug ID: 34460 Summary: Patron category should regulate if account can have permissions Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Permission management would be simpler if there were a setting in patron categories that indicate whether that category of patron can have permissions. - If no, that option would not appear in the patron menu. - If patron category is changed to a category that does not allow permissions, any existing permissions should be cleared when change is saved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 23849] New: Update the list of sysprefs to share with Hea
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Jul '26

22 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23849 Bug ID: 23849 Summary: Update the list of sysprefs to share with Hea Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We have a lot of sysprefs that are not recorded in Hea. We lack a process to keep the list up-to-date. We are going to have an updated list for 19.11. For next releases it should be a new post release task (https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Post_major_release_tasks) This bug report could be reused for the next releases. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 82

[Bug 39267] New: Specified due date remains for checkouts even when removing unchecking remember for session
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Jul '26

22 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39267 Bug ID: 39267 Summary: Specified due date remains for checkouts even when removing unchecking remember for session Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: glasklas(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com When checking out an item for a borrower, choosing a specific due date and checking the "remember for session". If another checkout is done, removing the date and unchecking "remember for session", after the checkout has been performed, the previously set due date is still there. It's difficult to see how the correct behaviour shouldn't be that the date is cleared from the session as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 41199] New: Advanced Search fields could use more visible label options
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Jul '26

22 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41199 Bug ID: 41199 Summary: Advanced Search fields could use more visible label options Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Accessibility Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jake.deery(a)openfifth.co.uk QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: martin.renvoize(a)openfifth.co.uk, matt.blenkinsop(a)openfifth.co.uk, oleonard(a)myacpl.org The advanced search & search masthead could both do with more visible labels. This aids users in navigating the system, and also helps to provide screen readers with more context about an input field. We should offer a syspref that controls the number of visible labels, so libraries can have greater control over the extent of these labels. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 13

[Bug 39296] New: Provide a template plugin to return MARC::Record for MARCXML metadata
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Jul '26

22 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39296 Bug ID: 39296 Summary: Provide a template plugin to return MARC::Record for MARCXML metadata Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Reports Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: dcook(a)prosentient.com.au QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org ExtractValue() is a useful MySQL function but it's limited in what it can do. Sometimes, you want to do reporting off a more nuanced understanding of MARC. I had thought about exposing XML::LibXML::Document and XML::LibXML::XPathContext objects, but they're too powerful/vulnerable to abuse. Instead, I decided that MARC::Record should give all the power we need while not upsetting the status quo or security (after all, we already allow access to MARC::Record objects via $biblio objects in Templates). In this case, you fetch the whole "metadata" blob from the database in your report, and you transform it using a template using Koha::Template::Plugin::KohaMarcRecord It lets you perform more advanced reporting using the full MARC record. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 20

[Bug 35471] New: Automatically select child MARC framework when adding child records
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Jul '26

22 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35471 Bug ID: 35471 Summary: Automatically select child MARC framework when adding child records Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lari.taskula(a)hypernova.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Some libraries create their own MARC frameworks for component/child records. When adding a child record through host record, Koha currently selects the default MARC framework and a librarian must manually change to the child record framework. This Bug adds a parent-child relationship to MARC frameworks and aims to skip the manual step of selecting child record framework. The goal is to automatically select child MARC framework when adding child record through the host record. To reproduce problem: Administration -> MARC bibliographic framework 1. Create framework with frameworkcode "A" 2. Create framework with frameworkcode "A-child" Record view 1. Save record with framework "A" 2. Navigate to a record 3. Click "+ New", a drop-down opens 4. Click "New child record" 5. After add biblio form opens, click "Settings" 6. Observe default framework selected 7. You must manually select "A-child framework" After this change, To test: Administration -> MARC bibliographic framework 1. Create framework with frameworkcode "A" 2. Create framework with frameworkcode "A-child" 3. Set "A" as "A-child" 's parent framework Record view 1. Save record with framework "A" 2. Navigate to a record 3. Click "+ New", a drop-down opens 4. Click "New child record" 5. After add biblio form opens, click "Settings" 6. Observe "A-child" framework automatically selected -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 55

[Bug 40646] New: ‘Patron account expiry’ message selections un-set when switching 'Enforce patron account expiry notice' from Yes to No
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Jul '26

22 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40646 Bug ID: 40646 Summary: ‘Patron account expiry’ message selections un-set when switching 'Enforce patron account expiry notice' from Yes to No Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 25.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: sbrown(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com With 30301, the ‘Patron account expiry’ message line doesn't show in 'Default messaging preferences for this patron category' if 'Enforce patron account expiry notice' is set to Yes. This means that if the notice is being enforced and the library needs to edit its default preferences, they have to switch 'Enforce patron account expiry notice' to No, click Save, and then open the category back up for editing. However, switching 'Enforce patron account expiry notice' from Yes to No un-sets the existing preferences rather than just showing existing selections for editing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 37710] New: Remove the marc link when removing an item from a bundle
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Jul '26

22 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37710 Bug ID: 37710 Summary: Remove the marc link when removing an item from a bundle Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: baptiste.wojtkowski(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl A new functionality to automatically add a new MARC link has been added in Bug 29560 (Add option to create MARC links when adding items to bundles). There should also be a way to remove this link when removing the item from the bundle. Moreover I don't know if this should be a second bug but since the link is not removed, there can be multiple links if the item is added to a new bundle. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 26

[Bug 39809] New: Category name and code in red and italic in patron category form
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Jul '26

22 Jul '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39809 Bug ID: 39809 Summary: Category name and code in red and italic in patron category form Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org In main, when I go to the patron category form, the required fields' inputs are in red and italic. To recreate: A.1. Go to Administration > Patron categories A.2. Click New category --> Notice the labels for Category code, Description and Category type are in italic (they used to be just red and bold, but not italic) A.3. Type in a code and a description --> Notice that the input is now in red and italic (it used to be black and regular/not italic) B.1. Go to Administration > Patron categories B.2. Click on an existing category --> Notice the description inside the input field is in red and italic (it used to be black and regular/not italic) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 26