December 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 24082] New: Add a 'refund' option to anonymous payments
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24082 Bug ID: 24082 Summary: Add a 'refund' option to anonymous payments Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org With bug 23442 we add a process for recording refunds to patrons. We need to expand this for anonymous payments once bug 23354 is available. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 53

[Bug 41456] New: Item type filter on the hold history view does not work correctly
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41456 Bug ID: 41456 Summary: Item type filter on the hold history view does not work correctly Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com Depends on: 41451 We should be able to search using the item type's code or description. We also need to have the item types listed in a dropdown list. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41451 [Bug 41451] Hold history search fails when itemtype column present -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 32

[Bug 36525] New: Rename Notices and slips tool to Templates
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36525 Bug ID: 36525 Summary: Rename Notices and slips tool to Templates Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Now that the Notices and slips tool encompasses more than notices and slips, it makes more sense to rename the tool to Templates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 38769] New: Add plugins consent types to OPAC self registration process
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38769 Bug ID: 38769 Summary: Add plugins consent types to OPAC self registration process Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The new functionality allows plugins to add patron consent types to the system doesn't expose those consent types to the user at self registration time like we do for the data processing consent. We should have that option -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 31503] New: Groundwork for 20380 (mail consent)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31503 Bug ID: 31503 Summary: Groundwork for 20380 (mail consent) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 170

[Bug 31533] New: Add opt-in/opt-out flags to patron consents
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31533 Bug ID: 31533 Summary: Add opt-in/opt-out flags to patron consents Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Part of the 20380 set. Building on top of 31503. While we now only enforce the GDPR consent if the pref is set to Enforced, we leave other consents empty. Which actually is opt-in. They need to go to the consents page and enable the specific consent. If we would add opt-out, we can either add consents for all users or make PatronConsent a bit smarter and only register refusal (opt-out). It feels more consistent to add all consents to the table, and add them too in the self reg process. But when you add a new consent type and mark it as opt-out, we should then populate the table too. Do we also need a Mandatory flag? Historically, we treat the GDPR consent as such. Other consents may not be of that same category. But we might want the user to make an explicit choice there without the same exceptional approach that we use for GDPR. How do we get him on that page? If he arrives there, we can obviously allow saving only when those mandatories are filled.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 30968] New: opac-authorites-home.pl still accessible even when OpacAuthorities system preference is turned off
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Feb '26

02 Feb '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30968 Bug ID: 30968 Summary: opac-authorites-home.pl still accessible even when OpacAuthorities system preference is turned off Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 21.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: wizzyrea(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When the system preference OpacAuthorities is turned off, the page https://your.library.here/cgi-bin/koha/opac-authorities-home.pl is still accessible and likely shouldn't be. To test: set OpacAuthorities to Don't Allow try to visit https://your.library.here/cgi-bin/koha/opac-authorities-home.pl note that the page is still accessible. Thanks for checking it out! Liz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 39669] New: Update reserves notices to use Koha::Patron->queue_notice
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Jan '26

30 Jan '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39669 Bug ID: 39669 Summary: Update reserves notices to use Koha::Patron->queue_notice Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)openfifth.co.uk QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Blocks: 37214 This is one of the more challenging cases as C4::Reservers supports Digests and thus uses C4::Message. It would be a good one to build out tests for and enhance the Koha::Patron->enqueue_notice message, allowing for more adoption of messaging preferences and digest functionality. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37214 [Bug 37214] We should migrate to Koha::Patron->queue_notice wherever possible -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 39176] New: Update additional_field_values.record_id to varchar(255)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Jan '26

30 Jan '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39176 Bug ID: 39176 Summary: Update additional_field_values.record_id to varchar(255) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org In bug 38663 we had to switch from int(11) to varchar(11) so we could properly store branchcode, the primary key for the branches table. In bug 38457 I'm now faced with the same issue of needing to update the field from varchar(11) to varchar(80) to allow for the code field in the account_debit_types table which is a varchar(80) primary key. Looking to the future and how we're starting to add more and more uses of additional fields I think we should pick the largest current primary key field and match that. SELECT t.TABLE_NAME AS table_name, k.COLUMN_NAME AS primary_key_field, CASE WHEN k.CHARACTER_MAXIMUM_LENGTH IS NOT NULL THEN CONCAT(k.DATA_TYPE, '(', k.CHARACTER_MAXIMUM_LENGTH, ')') WHEN k.NUMERIC_PRECISION IS NOT NULL THEN CONCAT(k.DATA_TYPE, '(', k.NUMERIC_PRECISION, ')') ELSE k.DATA_TYPE END AS primary_key_type FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES t JOIN INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS k ON t.TABLE_NAME = k.TABLE_NAME AND t.TABLE_SCHEMA = k.TABLE_SCHEMA JOIN INFORMATION_SCHEMA.KEY_COLUMN_USAGE ku ON t.TABLE_NAME = ku.TABLE_NAME AND t.TABLE_SCHEMA = ku.TABLE_SCHEMA AND k.COLUMN_NAME = ku.COLUMN_NAME JOIN INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS tc ON ku.TABLE_NAME = tc.TABLE_NAME AND ku.TABLE_SCHEMA = tc.TABLE_SCHEMA AND ku.CONSTRAINT_NAME = tc.CONSTRAINT_NAME WHERE t.TABLE_SCHEMA = DATABASE() AND tc.CONSTRAINT_TYPE = 'PRIMARY KEY' ORDER BY t.TABLE_NAME; Using the above query, I believe that shows the largest is a varchar(255). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 36067] New: Inconsistencies in --commit, --confirm for command line scrips
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Jan '26

30 Jan '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36067 Bug ID: 36067 Summary: Inconsistencies in --commit, --confirm for command line scrips Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Command-line Utilities Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: robin(a)catalyst.net.nz Our scripts have a mix of --commit and --confirm to 'actually do the job'. I think we should try to be consistent here.. with the most backward compatible option being to make them synonyms in each script. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 16