July 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 39865] New: Consider updating OpenLibrary covers search API
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Sep '26

29 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39865 Bug ID: 39865 Summary: Consider updating OpenLibrary covers search API Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 24.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oliver.behnke(a)aei.mpg.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Koha currently uses OpenLibrary's "Legacy Book API" [1] to fetch book covers which "is a legacy endpoint and may be phased out in the future". Also, it's inefficient. The replacement seems to be the dedicated "Covers API" [2]. One drawback, though, it's currently rate limited to 100 requests per IP per five minutes. That might quickly be exhausted on the OPAC search result page. Thanks [1] https://openlibrary.org/dev/docs/api/books [2] https://openlibrary.org/dev/docs/api/covers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 29733] New: MARC21: Link 7xx linking fields to marc21_linking_section.pl value builder in sample frameworks
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Sep '26

29 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29733 Bug ID: 29733 Summary: MARC21: Link 7xx linking fields to marc21_linking_section.pl value builder in sample frameworks Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: MARC Bibliographic data support Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We do link the authority controlled fields to the authority linker by default, so it would make sense to link the fields used for linking between bibliographic records to the available helper plugin as well. At the moment the plugin is not well know, although it provides a great functionality, this could help advertise and improve it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 15

[Bug 30303] New: Add ability to select which values to retain when merging patrons
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Sep '26

29 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30303 Bug ID: 30303 Summary: Add ability to select which values to retain when merging patrons Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com When merging two patron records, one simply picks one record to retain values from. It would be helpful to have an interface more like what we see when merging biblio records, where one can select values from either pre-merge record to be retained post-merge. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 63

[Bug 35333] New: Koha::Patron->add_guarantor not checking anything
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Sep '26

29 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35333 Bug ID: 35333 Summary: Koha::Patron->add_guarantor not checking anything Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: tomascohen(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org This method should receive a `guarantor` parameter, and check if it is a valid guarantor, the same way we later check when saving patrons that the guaratonrs are valid (which I think was put in the wrong place). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 35729] New: Coce Should Account for New ISBN 979*
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Sep '26

29 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35729 Bug ID: 35729 Summary: Coce Should Account for New ISBN 979* Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kalleen(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Hi, I noticed that there was a cover mismatch with a coce_amazon cover because the new 2024 title has an ISBN of 9798885795692 (using the 979 instead of 978). There is an Italian title with an ISBN of 8885795692 that is showing instead. It looks like they have updated the valid ISBN standards: https://isbn.org/about_isbn_standard and it seems like coce should be updated to recognize this new standard and not match 9798885795692 to be the same as 8885795692. Thanks! Kal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 97

[Bug 24608] New: Allow modification of checkout due date
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Sep '26

29 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24608 Bug ID: 24608 Summary: Allow modification of checkout due date Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew.isherwood(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Currently it is not possible to modify a checkout's due date. This bug proposes to allow such an action. It is only proposed to allow modification of a due date *forward* at this stage as moving a due date backwards may involve additional complication that will require further thought. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 71

[Bug 28593] New: Add ability to charge lost fee when applying new lost status when resolving a claim
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Sep '26

28 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28593 Bug ID: 28593 Summary: Add ability to charge lost fee when applying new lost status when resolving a claim Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Depends on: 28271 Bug 28271 added the ability to apply a new lost status when resolving a claim. We should also add the ability to charge a replacement fee. Many libraries do not charge a replacement fee when a claim is generated. If the item is not found within the time period allowed by library policy, then the item is assumed lost, the claim is resolved, and the item is set to lost. At that point, the library would like to charge the patron. As things stand, there is not a way to generate a lost fee tied to that issue_id. You'd have to either create a manual invoice or return the item, check it back out to the patron, and mark it lost again. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28271 [Bug 28271] Add the ability to set a new lost status when a claim is resolved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 40252] New: Create dedicated ILL_HOLD_SLIP
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Sep '26

28 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40252 Bug ID: 40252 Summary: Create dedicated ILL_HOLD_SLIP Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: lisette(a)bywatersolutions.com, pedro.amorim(a)openfifth.co.uk, tomascohen(a)gmail.com Many ILL backends tie an ILL request to a hold in Koha. In these cases, libraries generally want to print a distinct HOLD_SLIP for holds associated with ILL requests. This leads to long and complicated HOLD_SLIPs. We'd like to teach Koha to use a new distinct slip when a hold has an illrequest associated with it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 35066] New: In the Holds Queue, add ability to decline to fill a hold and automatically push to the next branch
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Sep '26

28 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35066 Bug ID: 35066 Summary: In the Holds Queue, add ability to decline to fill a hold and automatically push to the next branch Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 22.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: catrina(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com For libraries using the holds queue, they should have the ability to deny filling the hold so it would push the item onto the next branch's holds queue without having to wait for the cron to run. Right now, the only way to move an item off a library's queue is to mark it as missing/lost or damaged. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 38822] New: View easilty the months for which usage reports have been collected for a given source
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Sep '26

28 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38822 Bug ID: 38822 Summary: View easilty the months for which usage reports have been collected for a given source Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ERM Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com Reporter: mathsabypro(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com, jonathan.field(a)ptfs-europe.com, martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com, matt.blenkinsop(a)ptfs-europe.com, pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com It could be nice to make it easy to view the months for which various usage reports have been collected for a given source (without the need to create a report in Koha) (FOLIO ERM or Coral could be source of inspiration) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 14