January 2026 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 41267] New: It should be possible to prevent some itemtypes from filling other biblio level holds
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Aug '26

05 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41267 Bug ID: 41267 Summary: It should be possible to prevent some itemtypes from filling other biblio level holds Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, lisette(a)bywatersolutions.com, tomascohen(a)gmail.com See bug 40792 and related/dependent bugs. Currently Koha will fill any title level holds on a record when another item on the record is checked out. Some libraries want this behaviour, others don't want it for all item types. E.g. - A library has 'lucky day' item which cannot have holds placed. If a patron finds them in the library they can check them out. In some libraries they have similar circ rules and so the item should fill the hold In other libraries the lucky day items have a shorter circulation period, so the patron may still want the regular book with a longer circ We should add a circulation rule to determine if an item type should or should not fill other biblio level holds Filing as a bug since many libraries consider this a regression -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 55

[Bug 28863] New: Cancel a Pending Notice
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Aug '26

05 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28863 Bug ID: 28863 Summary: Cancel a Pending Notice Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: rcoert(a)arlingtonva.us QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We would like the ability to cancel any notice that is currently "Pending" on the Notices tab in a user's account. Also, a record of which librarian cancelled the notice and date/time stamp would be very useful. Use Case: Item is discharged, hold is trapped, & notice is generated. Staff then realizes that the item is badly damaged and reverts the hold to obtain another copy. However, the notice for the original item is now Pending in the account and the email will be sent - even though the item is not on the Hold Shelf. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 19

[Bug 40951] New: Optionally show reserve_id to users in the staff interface
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Aug '26

05 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40951 Bug ID: 40951 Summary: Optionally show reserve_id to users in the staff interface Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, lisette(a)bywatersolutions.com, tomascohen(a)gmail.com, trevor.diamond(a)mainlib.org The action logs for holds use the reserve_id for "object," which makes the reserve_id necessary for most searching one might want to do in that log. Unfortunately, there's no way to see that reserve_id in the staff interface without a report. For users who spend a lot of time looking at hold logs, it'd be helpful to be able to see the reserve_id from a patron's hold history and a biblio's list of current holds. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 41678] New: Add a warning when max servers are reached
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Aug '26

05 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41678 Bug ID: 41678 Summary: Add a warning when max servers are reached Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: SIP2 Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: ryan.henderson(a)openfifth.co.uk QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Hi All, We've been investigating an issue with a SIP configuration with a library who have multiple SIP units. It took us a while to find out that the issue was due to the max servers being reached. What would be a nice enhancement is adding a warning / error message into the sip logs to say that the max servers were reached. SIP2 is using prefork which from reading it seems to be able to provide this message which we currently don't seem to be doing. Kind regards, Ryan. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 39631] New: longoverdue.pl does not consider OverdueNoticeCalendar when calculating overdue days
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Aug '26

05 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39631 Bug ID: 39631 Summary: longoverdue.pl does not consider OverdueNoticeCalendar when calculating overdue days Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: hammat.wele(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com When the system preference OverdueNoticeCalendar is activated, the script longoverdue.pl continues to calculate overdue duration using calendar days instead of working days. This creates a discrepancy with overdue_notices.pl, which correctly uses working days for triggering overdue notices when OverdueNoticeCalendar is enabled. As a result, items may be marked as lost by longoverdue.pl before the final configured overdue notice (e.g., ODUE3) has a chance to be sent. To test 1. Set the system preference OverdueNoticeCalendar to « ignore calendar » 2. Set the following preferences: DefaultLongOverdueLostValue = Long Overdue DefaultLongOverdueDays = 15 3. Define days when the library is closed 3.1. Go to Tools > Calendar 3.2. Click on a Saturday (e.g., 2025-04-12) Fill Description = Saturdays, Click on "Holiday repeated every same day of the week." and Click on Copy to all libraries and submit 3.3. Repeat step 3.2. by clicking on Sundays (e.g., 2025-04-13) similarly. 4. Checkout an item to a patron of category type Board, and set due date to 2025-03-29 (15 days before today). 4.1. Click on "Show checkouts", click the barcode, and note the itemnumber. 5. Run: ./misc/cronjobs/longoverdue.pl --> The item should be flagged as overdue (e.g., item 378 appears in the output). 6. Now Enable the system preference OverdueNoticeCalendar. 7. Run longoverdue.pl again: --> The item is still detected as overdue, even though it should not be (due to holidays). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 11

[Bug 40658] New: When sorting by local-number we should use the sort field
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Aug '26

05 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40658 Bug ID: 40658 Summary: When sorting by local-number we should use the sort field Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When adding 'local-number' as a fallback sort I explicitly added sorting on 'local-number' - it should be 'local-number__sort' This avoids problems when mappings may be older and local-number itself is indexed as a string and not a number -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 37

[Bug 33756] New: Wrong calculation of total amount spent?
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Aug '26

05 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33756 Bug ID: 33756 Summary: Wrong calculation of total amount spent? Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org I am trying to work out something in acquisitions and stumbled on this bit: https://git.koha-community.org/Koha-community/Koha/src/branch/master/C4/Bud… # Get all the budgets totals in as few queries as possible my $hr_budget_spent = $dbh->selectall_hashref(q| SELECT aqorders.budget_id, aqbudgets.budget_parent_id, SUM( | . C4::Acquisition::get_rounding_sql(qq|COALESCE(unitprice_tax_included, ecost_tax_included)|) . q| * quantity ) AS budget_spent FROM aqorders JOIN aqbudgets USING (budget_id) WHERE quantityreceived > 0 AND datecancellationprinted IS NULL GROUP BY budget_id, budget_parent_id |, 'budget_id'); If the amount is spent, I feel multiplying by quantity is incorrect. It should be quantityreceived. I am not sure yet where this is used and how it manifests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 14

[Bug 41410] New: Allow definition of a period after hold creation during which the hold is only filled locally
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Aug '26

05 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41410 Bug ID: 41410 Summary: Allow definition of a period after hold creation during which the hold is only filled locally Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, lisette(a)bywatersolutions.com, tomascohen(a)gmail.com Currently, with local holds priority enabled the holds queue will always target an available local item if one exists; this preference is enforced before Koha consults the transport cost matrix or thinks about the Hungarian algorithm. This dev will: - add a new field to tmp_holdsqueue: local priority match - add a new system preference to enable this option and set days value for local priority period - local priority period is defined relative to when the hold was created - when the queue targets an item, add the local priority match flag if the target item is within the local holds group of the hold pickup location - at checkin, if the item could fill a hold Koha will check: -- is this item within the hold pickup group? If yes, fill hold; if no, proceed to next check -- is the hold within the local priority period? If no, fill hold; if yes, proceed to next check -- does the queue's current target have the local priority match flag? If no, fill hold; if yes, do not fill hold (look for other holds this item could fill or check item in) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 64

[Bug 26757] New: SMS Test Button
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Aug '26

05 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26757 Bug ID: 26757 Summary: SMS Test Button Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org It would be great if there were a test button on the staff and opac interfaces for testing the SMS setting to make sure they work, rather than having to wait for a message to trigger, or having to setup a scenario to trigger a notice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 19

[Bug 17015] New: New Koha Calendar
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 05 Aug '26

05 Aug '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17015 Bug ID: 17015 Summary: New Koha Calendar Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Holidays Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: mehdi.hamidi(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We are trying to create a new Koha calendar system. The one available right now is way too slow. This is the first patch of the calendar, it doesn't affect the functioning of the current calendar, but it works in parallel with it. Instead of having multiple tables for the holidays, we created one table, called discrete_calendar. This table contains the dates,branchcode, opening/closing hours, a note about the holiday and whether the library is open or not. The script misc/generate_discrete_calendar.pl fills the table discrete_calendar based on tables : repeatable_holidays, special_holidays, openinghours and branches. The script, by default, will add 2 years from the past and 1 year in the future in the table discrete_calendar. It also has an option to added more than 1 year in the future. The script misc/cronjobs/add_days_discrete_calendar.pl will add days in the future in the table discrete calendar. A day's opening and closing hours will be based on the same weekday from the week before. It will also check if the same day from last year was a holiday, if so, this will be counted as a holiday. The script makes sur there's at least 1 year in the future. So if it hasn't ran for 8 days, 8 days will be added in he future the next time the script is executed. There's also an atomic update to create the table. The current options are not final and they can be changed for convenience. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 528