April 2026 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 42013] New: Confirmation dialog for "Remove all reserves" never shown on course details page
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42013 Bug ID: 42013 Summary: Confirmation dialog for "Remove all reserves" never shown on course details page Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Course reserves Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: paul.derscheid(a)lmscloud.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org On the course details page (course_reserves/course-details.tt), clicking "Remove all reserves" skips the confirmation dialog and immediately submits the form. The "Remove all reserves" button (#rm_items_button) is an <a> tag separate from the #rm_items form. The click handler on the button calls $("#rm_items").submit() programmatically. A separate $("#rm_items").click(...) handler was intended to show a confirmDelete dialog, but it is bound as a click event on the form element, which is never clicked by the user. jQuery's .submit() method also does not trigger click events, so the confirmation is never shown. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 40159] New: When modifying a subscription with received issues, prediction pattern doesn't start from next issue date
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40159 Bug ID: 40159 Summary: When modifying a subscription with received issues, prediction pattern doesn't start from next issue date Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Serials Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: arthur.suzuki(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org To reproduce the issue : Make a record and create a subscription for this record with a week or month subscription length and a first issue date in the past (like 2016). Receive at least one issue. Edit the subscription and test the prediction pattern. The displayed prediction shows only one number (unless you set the subscription length for like a thousand issues). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 16

[Bug 33276] New: Library limitations will cause data loss when editing serials
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33276 Bug ID: 33276 Summary: Library limitations will cause data loss when editing serials Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Serials Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: thibaud.guillot(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Hello @ll, This bug can be related to 31422 and 32748. That's the same behavior on "Locations" dropdown list for serials. When a value is limited to a library if we're logging with a patron from another lib, the location value is empty and can be replaced. I copied the same logic as the submitted patch for 32748. We can modify the value but the current value (provides from another lib) stay in dropdown. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 14

[Bug 33738] New: Add bookings to the OPAC
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33738 Bug ID: 33738 Summary: Add bookings to the OPAC Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com, testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 29002 As part of the bookings workflow, we should add support for making bookings from the OPAC as a patron. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29002 [Bug 29002] Add ability to book items ahead of time -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 61

[Bug 41407] New: OPAC hold history sorts newest to oldest but hides newest to limit to 50
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41407 Bug ID: 41407 Summary: OPAC hold history sorts newest to oldest but hides newest to limit to 50 Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: lisette(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Sort of hold history on the opac is unintuitive. It seems like if it's sorting newest to oldest, it should show the 50 newest holds, not active holds then oldest->newest holds until 50. To recreate on main: 1. Allow to override holds in system preferences 2. Allow borrowers to see HoldHistory in the OPAC 3. place at least 51 holds for a single patron. 4. Backdate some of the hold dates to past days, set one of them to be newer than the rest. 5. log in as that patron on the OPAC 6. Go to the holds history 7. observe the 50 holds and see that your newest one doesn't show 8. click the link to view all and see your newst one does show. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 42476] New: Rephrase ElasticsearchEnableZebraQueue system preference
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42476 Bug ID: 42476 Summary: Rephrase ElasticsearchEnableZebraQueue system preference Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: 24.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The new system preference for reads: This preference should probably be set to 'Disable' unless you want Koha to act as a Z39.50 or SRU server. But this is not true, you can have Z39.50 and SRU without Zebra as well using the z3950-responder. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 40714] New: cookieConsent: current approach arguable on public computers or shared devices
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40714 Bug ID: 40714 Summary: cookieConsent: current approach arguable on public computers or shared devices Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Since we just save a simple key in localStorage, this may still be active on public computers for the next user of that computer? Unless they have separate guest accounts, or cookies and localStorage are cleared when the browser exits. Should we make a difference between browsing anonymous or logging in to Koha within this context of public computers? If so, we might need to save data in the db instead of locally? Looks like this report is less clear than the two others (40712 and 40713). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 41375] New: Tool to generate a default privacy policy document
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41375 Bug ID: 41375 Summary: Tool to generate a default privacy policy document Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: new feature Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: lari.taskula(a)hypernova.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org It would be nice to ship a default privacy policy document with Koha. It could be a configurable tool where superlibrarians could 1. check checkboxes for the types of data they are collecting in Koha 2. include the values of *Log system preferences 3. include templates from privacy regulations, such as GDPR, or national legislation (you could select which template to add) 4. define the durations of data collection (it would be nice to be able to read the triggers of cleanup-database.pl and other cronjobs, but this shouldn't be a blocker for this Bug) 5. document the use of cookies https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Use_of_Cookies The tool would come with prewritten templates, but they should also be modifiable. Something like we currently have with notice templates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 40713] New: cookieConsent: key should have an expiration date
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40713 Bug ID: 40713 Summary: cookieConsent: key should have an expiration date Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Currently, the created localStorage key cookieConsent does not expire. This needs adjustment in view of following information: "The GDPR does not specify a fixed time limit for cookie expiry; instead, the duration must be proportionate to the cookie's purpose and never exceed 12 months according to the ePrivacy Directive, which requires consent renewal at least annually, and potentially more frequently based on your local Data Protection Authority's (DPA) guidelines, like the six-month recommendations from the Irish DPC and French CNIL." -- See e.g. https://gdpr.eu/cookies/ "If you use a cookie to store a record that a user has given consent to the use of cookies, you should ask the user to reaffirm their consent no longer than six months [*] after you have stored this consent state. (Footnote: While the legislation does not prescribe a specific lifespan for such cookies, based on a first-principles analysis by the DPC, we consider this to be the appropriate default outer timeframe for storing the user’s consent state. A controller would need to objectively and on a case-by-case basis justify storage for a longer period.)" -- Data Protection Commission [Ireland] Since localStorage has no expiration mechanism itself, we could simply add e.g. a unix timestamp as value here. Since the key now contains empty string and is tested for null to check status. This check would become: does the key exist and is its value still in future? A reject removes the key or clears it. Would it be possible to add the expiry period to a preference or enclosed in CookieConsentedJS somehow? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 40712] New: cookieConsent: Accepting essential cookies is unneeded/misleading
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40712 Bug ID: 40712 Summary: cookieConsent: Accepting essential cookies is unneeded/misleading Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org It feels a bit strange to Accept essential cookies. If you dont accept, they work anyway. And if you can accept, you would expect a reject either. But you cant reject them: they are essential and the code just uses them. If there are no additional non-essential cookies, it feels like the bar just needs a OK button to dismiss a message that there are only essential cookies. (This dismissal is not an accept.) "Under GDPR, essential (or strictly necessary) cookies are exempt from requiring user consent because they are fundamental for basic website functionality." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2