May 2026 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 39780] New: Update library groups form to use grid layout
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 26 Oct '26

26 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39780 Bug ID: 39780 Summary: Update library groups form to use grid layout Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 39483 Building on Bug 39483, I'm working to convert the library groups forms to the new grid layout. This will include some changes to the .fg form grid to allow for defining a couple of different widths for the input grid item and to convert the grid-related media queries to be container queries instead. This allows the form grid to be responsive based on width of the the container (<fieldset) rather than the width of the page. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39483 [Bug 39483] Update staff interface forms to use grid layout -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 59

[Bug 42018] New: Inconsistent behavior for null values for fields selected in PatronDuplicateMatchingAddFields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 26 Oct '26

26 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42018 Bug ID: 42018 Summary: Inconsistent behavior for null values for fields selected in PatronDuplicateMatchingAddFields Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: 25.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: sbrown(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com PatronDuplicateMatchingAddFields behaves differently for null values depending on whether the null values are in the existing patron record or the record being created. To replicate: -Set PatronDuplicateMatchingAddFields to surname, firstname, email Scenario 1: -Create patron A with a first name and surname, but null email -Create patron B with a first name and surname matching patron A, but a value in email -----> NOT FLAGGED as duplicate Scenario 2: -Create patron A with a first name, surname, and email -Create patron B with a first name and surname matching patron A, but null email -----> FLAGGED as duplicate It seems that the two scenarios should behave the same way, or that there should be documentation of the different behavior in the manual. This applies to 40082 but is also true for duplicate matching in the staff interface. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 25

[Bug 42700] New: In C4/SIP/ILS/Patron.pm, hold_items only counts waiting holds
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 26 Oct '26

26 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42700 Bug ID: 42700 Summary: In C4/SIP/ILS/Patron.pm, hold_items only counts waiting holds Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: SIP2 Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org I can't find good documentation on this, but I think this is a bug: hold_items => $flags->{WAITING}->{itemlist}, holds_items is currently a count of waiting holds, when it should total holds. Meanwhile unavail_holds is a count of all holds except waiting holds. Some 3rd party SIP machines use this calculation to get a count of "holds to pick up": holds ready for pickup = hold_items - unavail_holds Currently this can produce a negative number. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 35

[Bug 40668] New: Library groups and seperateholdings with itemgroups prevents adding items to itemgroup
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 26 Oct '26

26 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40668 Bug ID: 40668 Summary: Library groups and seperateholdings with itemgroups prevents adding items to itemgroup Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff interface Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lisette(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com To recreate: 1. On a single record, create at least 20 items at Centerville, 10 at Fairfield, 10 at Fairview 2. create a library group that has Fairfield and Fairview and check Limit item editing to items owned inside of this group. 3. Enable EnableItemGroups & SeparateHoldings 4. Set a patron (I used Henry) to have a password you know and the following permissions: -Staff access (catalogue) -Edit Catalog -Edit Items -Create, update and delete item groups, add or remove items from an item group 5. Set their library to Fairfield 6. Create an item group on your record. 7. In another browser/guest window, log in as your patron from step 4. 8. Navigate to your record. 9. Navigate to the "Other holdings" page, there should be no checkboxes. 10. Use the filters or the table search to filter to Fairview, there should now be checkboxes. 11. If you click a checkbox, you are not shown the section: Actions: Add/move to item group Remove from item group The check only happens when the table loads based on if the first page of results has s selectable items or not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 20

[Bug 35729] New: Coce Should Account for New ISBN 979*
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 26 Oct '26

26 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35729 Bug ID: 35729 Summary: Coce Should Account for New ISBN 979* Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kalleen(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Hi, I noticed that there was a cover mismatch with a coce_amazon cover because the new 2024 title has an ISBN of 9798885795692 (using the 979 instead of 978). There is an Italian title with an ISBN of 8885795692 that is showing instead. It looks like they have updated the valid ISBN standards: https://isbn.org/about_isbn_standard and it seems like coce should be updated to recognize this new standard and not match 9798885795692 to be the same as 8885795692. Thanks! Kal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 99

[Bug 41681] New: bulkmarcimport.pl reports an incorrect number of MARC records processed
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 26 Oct '26

26 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41681 Bug ID: 41681 Summary: bulkmarcimport.pl reports an incorrect number of MARC records processed Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: hammat.wele(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Created attachment 191849 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=191849&action=e… A marc file containing 5 records When running the script bulkmarcimport.pl, the number of MARC records reported at the end of the execution does not match the actual number of records processed from the input file. To reproduce: 1. Download the joined MARC file containing 5 records. 2. Run the import command: ./misc/migration_tools/bulkmarcimport.pl -b --file=marc_file.mrc 3. Check the final script report ==> 11 MARC records done in 0.566349983215332 seconds The reported number is incorrect -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 29

[Bug 42632] New: Cannot manage bundles after filters are displayed
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 26 Oct '26

26 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42632 Bug ID: 42632 Summary: Cannot manage bundles after filters are displayed Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff interface Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com If "Show/Hide filters" link is clicked, the "Manage bundle" buttons do not longer work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 18

[Bug 42298] New: "No automatic renewal before" falls back to "No renewal before" if former is greater than the latter
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 26 Oct '26

26 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=42298 Bug ID: 42298 Summary: "No automatic renewal before" falls back to "No renewal before" if former is greater than the latter Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Command-line Utilities Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lari.taskula(a)hypernova.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: robin(a)catalyst.net.nz Although this discovery was made due to a misconfiguration (we actually meant "no automatic renewals before" to have a value smaller than "no renewal before"), I think this finding is still worth reporting. --- Koha has two circulation rules for setting the earliest date a checkout can be renewed: "No renewal before" for manual renewals, and "No automatic renewal before" for automatic renewals. Using automatic renewals, we discovered that if circulation rule "No automatic renewal before" has a value greater than "No renewal before", automatic renewals are actually performed according to the "No renewal before" (manual) rule. Furthermore, this causes another bug where "too_soon" gets written in issues.auto_renew_error, instead of "auto_too_soon" as should be expected when called from the automatic_renewals.pl cronjob. This incorrect error status then causes yet another issue in AUTO_RENEWAL_DGST notices. The default notice template skips autorenewals with "auto_too_soon" error status, but since this bug writes it as "too_soon", the error is unhandled and such failed autorenewals unexpectedly become included in the notice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 25

[Bug 38361] New: Gender field does not include a Required if the field is set to required in PatronSelfRegistrationBorrowerMandatoryField
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 26 Oct '26

26 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38361 Bug ID: 38361 Summary: Gender field does not include a Required if the field is set to required in PatronSelfRegistrationBorrowerMandatoryField Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org To recreate: 1. PatronSelfRegistrationBorrowerMandatoryField, find Gender(sex) and mark it as required. 2. Go to the self registration form. No 'Required' label. Also, this field is different because of the radio buttons. You cannot select a non value here so it makes interacting with PatronSelfRegistrationBorrowerMandatoryField weird. Why is this field a set of radio buttons when no others are? Should it be a dropdown? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 18

[Bug 20573] New: Patron receives membership expiry notice but 'will expire soon' alert doesn't show for staff at checkout
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 26 Oct '26

26 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20573 Bug ID: 20573 Summary: Patron receives membership expiry notice but 'will expire soon' alert doesn't show for staff at checkout Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 17.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jyorio(a)esilibrary.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com We've seen a situation a few times now, where a patron comes into the library and informs the staff that they received notice that their account is going to expire, but when staff go to the patron's account and click checkout, the message, "Attention: Expiration: Patron's card will expire soon. Patron's card expires on ...", doesn't appear. This issue happens when the patron comes into the library exactly 30 days from their expiration. In this case, MembershipExpiryDaysNotice = 30 days and NotifyBorrowerDeparture = 30 days. So for example, the patron's expiration date is 05/11/2018. On 4/11/2018 the patron gets their notice, as expected. They come into the library on 4/11/2018 and the checkout message alerting staff to the impending expiration message doesn't show. Checking the same account on 4/12/2018 shows the message "Attention: Expiration: Patron's card will expire soon. Patron's card expires on 05/11/2018 Renew or Edit Details" on the checkout screen. I would expect the staff to be alerted at checkout on 4/11/2018 since the patron has been notified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 20