- Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 7012] Limit to available does not exclude in-transit items
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Oct '24

15 Oct '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7012 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |BLOCKED Depends on| |37334 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com> --- Remote branch pushed, there is a very simple patch that addresses this, but on top of another big work, bug 37334. https://gitlab.com/joubu/Koha/-/commits/bug_7012 Marking as BLOCKED but the remote branch can be tested. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37334 [Bug 37334] Cannot filter holdings table by status -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 7012] Limit to available does not exclude in-transit items
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Oct '24

15 Oct '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7012 --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com> --- We can deal with in-transit, but what about withdrawn, lost, damaged (see bug 25375 comment 47). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 7012] Limit to available does not exclude in-transit items
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Oct '24

15 Oct '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7012 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Searching |Searching - Elasticsearch Depends on| |25375 Assignee|gmcharlt(a)gmail.com |jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com> --- I can have a look at this, for ES only however. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25375 [Bug 25375] Elasticsearch: Limit on available items does not work -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 25375] New: Elasticsearch: Limit on available items does not work
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Oct '24

15 Oct '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25375 Bug ID: 25375 Summary: Elasticsearch: Limit on available items does not work Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com Reporter: julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com Currently what this limit does is a filter on onloan:false This means that: - Any biblio with at least one checked out item will be hidden from the results, even if it has other available items - A biblio whose items are all lost, damaged, withdrawn or "notforloan" will not be hidden, but the results will show "X items, none available" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 70

[Bug 7012] Limit to available does not exclude in-transit items
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Oct '24

15 Oct '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7012 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com> --- The availability is in the ES's index already (bug 25375), we only need to adjust the "available" index. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 38171] New: Add types for all our JavaScript dependencies for better inline documentation
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Oct '24

15 Oct '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38171 Bug ID: 38171 Summary: Add types for all our JavaScript dependencies for better inline documentation Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: paul.derscheid(a)lmscloud.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When working with jQuery, flatpickr or any other JavaScript dependency, it can be very helpful to have the type definitions available for VSCode and consorts as well as Neovim. This patch just adds them when they are not already provided by the package itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 7012] Limit to available does not exclude in-transit items
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Oct '24

15 Oct '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7012 Martin Renvoize (ashimema) <martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.co | |m -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 7012] Limit to available does not exclude in-transit items
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Oct '24

15 Oct '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7012 --- Comment #14 from Martin Renvoize (ashimema) <martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com> --- I think that the challenge here is that whilst this sounds simple, it's actually rather involved. In my understanding, this is one of the parts of detail that we apply post-searching, so the information isn't available inside the indexes as it stands. It should be doable work, but it's not a quick job and thus is always at the bottom of developers' piles when there's more lucrative work in the queue :(. I'll try to see if I can carve out some time, but I'm also in the same boat of a whole queue of paid work with strict deadlines on my plate right now. This is the sort of thing I'd love to see the foundation sponsor once it's setup.. we all agree it's a bug and should be fixed, we just can't easily prioritise it individually when we have bills of our own to pay. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 7012] Limit to available does not exclude in-transit items
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Oct '24

15 Oct '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7012 Martin Renvoize (ashimema) <martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe | |.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 38170] New: xt/verify-yarnlock.t doesn't detect removal of packages
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 14 Oct '24

14 Oct '24

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38170 Bug ID: 38170 Summary: xt/verify-yarnlock.t doesn't detect removal of packages Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz Reporter: victor(a)tuxayo.net QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Found while reviewing Bug 38164 Test plan (not dependent on Bug 38164 being merged or not) 1. From package.json, remove the 3 @fortawesome* packages 2. Run prove xt/verify-yarnlock.t 3. It works! :o The test is working if I upgrade (edit package.json) webpack-cli from "^4.9.2" to "^5.1.4" And it's working if I add in package.json this "esperanto.js": "^1.1.0", I just searched a package that has no dependency (maybe testing with random stuff is a bit dangerous ^^") Are there other cases to handle? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1