August 2016 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 15503] Grab Item Information from Order Files
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '16

29 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15503 --- Comment #12 from Matthias Meusburger <matthias.meusburger(a)biblibre.com> --- Benjamin, can you post your MarcItemFieldsToOrder as well, please? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15503] Grab Item Information from Order Files
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '16

29 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15503 --- Comment #11 from Matthias Meusburger <matthias.meusburger(a)biblibre.com> --- Nick, no items were created using your sample file because it does not contain any homebranch informations. Currently, homebranch fields are used to know how many items should be added. Is there a better option? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15516] Allow to reserve first available item from a group of titles
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '16

29 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15516 Julian Maurice <julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |17217 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17217 [Bug 17217] Allow to reserve first available item from a group of titles (OPAC) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 15516] Allow to reserve first available item from a group of titles
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '16

29 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15516 --- Comment #32 from Julian Maurice <julian.maurice(a)biblibre.com> --- Created attachment 54977 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=54977&action=ed… Bug 15516: Set reserve-group.pl to be executable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14659] Allow patrons to enter card number and patron category on OPAC registration page
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '16

29 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14659 Nick Clemens <nick(a)bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |17213 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17213 [Bug 17213] Self registration cardnumber is not editable if errors found when form submitted -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14868] REST API: Swagger2-driven permission checking
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '16

29 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14868 --- Comment #42 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> --- Comment on attachment 54895 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=54895 Bug 14868: Give users possibility to request their own object Review of attachment 54895: --> (https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/page.cgi?id=splinter.html&bug=148…) ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: Koha/REST/V1.pm @@ +203,5 @@ > + > +sub _object_ownership_by_borrowernumber { > + my ($c, $user, $borrowernumber) = @_; > + > + return $user->borrowernumber == $borrowernumber; I think it's not that easy. For instance at the OPAC, a patron is not allowed to update his own details, it will need to be approved by a staff member. Using the REST API he will be able to bypass the approval. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14435] The table saved_reports is never populated
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '16

29 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14435 Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Failed QA |Signed Off -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 17067] New: Missing field "sms_provider_id" in database schema
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '16

29 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17067 Bug ID: 17067 Summary: Missing field "sms_provider_id" in database schema Change sponsored?: --- Product: Project Infrastructure Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Project website Assignee: wizzyrea(a)gmail.com Reporter: mik(a)adminkuhn.ch With https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9021 the new field "sms_provider_id" was created in Koha table "borrowers". It is actually there in Koha 16.05. But the field is not listed in http://schema.koha-community.org/tables/borrowers.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 10300] Allow transferring of items to be have separate IndependentBranches syspref
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '16

29 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10300 Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-c | |ommunity.org --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> --- As bug 15758 is going to pass QA soon, it would be good to rebase this patch on top of it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0

[Bug 14435] The table saved_reports is never populated
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Aug '16

29 Aug '16

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14435 --- Comment #30 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org> --- Hi Katrin, This patch restore a broken behavior, instead of removing it completely. If the feature is used and some guys want to improve it, let's them do it :) I do not plan to improve it by myself, especially because IMO it's out of the scope of this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 0