November 2017 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 18711] New: No longer possible have a blank value for Classification Sources in the Administration Module
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 01 Sep '25

01 Sep '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18711 Bug ID: 18711 Summary: No longer possible have a blank value for Classification Sources in the Administration Module Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 16.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: karen(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com In Koha 3.22 it was possible to enter a blank value for Classification Sources in the Administration Module. In 16.11 it is no longer possible to enter a blank value. The expected behavior is that it would still be possible to enter a blank value. The SWITCH Library Consortium has requested the ability to keep the ability to add a blank value field. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 17983] New: Add minutes loan to DiscreteCalendar
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Aug '25

28 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17983 Bug ID: 17983 Summary: Add minutes loan to DiscreteCalendar Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Holidays Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: mehdi.hamidi(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Hello everyone, This is an additional feature to our new Discrete Calendar. Theses patches add the possibility to choose the loan unit as minutes in circulations rules. Test plan: - Apply patch of Bugzilla 17015 - Apply this patch. - Run test t/db_dependent/minutes_loan.t - Create new item type for the new rule. - Create circulation rule and fill the fields, make sure the unit is set to : minutes, choose the item type of the one created above.- - Checkout an item that follow the circulation rule and set due date in the past. - Run fines.pl. - Check if the correct amount was calculated. - Note: make sure to factor in the fine grace period if set and the system preference FinesIncludeGracePeriod. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 49

[Bug 17511] New: Authority linking subfield
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 27 Aug '25

27 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17511 Bug ID: 17511 Summary: Authority linking subfield Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: stefan.berndtsson(a)ub.gu.se QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Currently Koha links authority records and bibliographic records using subfield 9. What is the reason behind this choice? According to the MARC21 specification, subfield 0 is "Authority record control number or standard number", which seems more logical. Usually 9 is a locally defined field, and Libris, the National Union Catalogue in Sweden, uses subfield 9 for various other things already. What would it take to make the linking subfield into a configurable option? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 49

[Bug 18081] New: New EU General Data Protection Regulation 2018
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 27 Aug '25

27 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18081 Bug ID: 18081 Summary: New EU General Data Protection Regulation 2018 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: new feature Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: black23(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Next year (2018) all EU countries must apply new regulations about data protection. So let's talk how to prepare Koha for this. More about regulation in english: http://www.privacy-regulation.eu/en/index.htm Mailing debate: http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-devel/2016-November/043314.h… Main questions: - how protect private data of borrowers (Qvarn etc.) - how connect people into Koha by secure way (https/SSL, Gloo etc.) - how protect APIs access (better documentation, best practise etc.) - how drive access to private data in system (new set of permissions?) - how to track security accidents and "damage" (more logs and analyse tool?) - how to offer better support for automatic anonymization/delete of non-active borrowes and their data from system - how to declare/certify Koha as system that protect private data and respect EU regulations This topis is very important for all libraries with Koha from EU countries. But data protection and security are universal topics at this time. It can be competetive advantage for Koha too. Mike -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 53

[Bug 16157] New: C4::Koha::GetAuthorisedValues should not handle the selected option
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '25

22 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16157 Bug ID: 16157 Summary: C4::Koha::GetAuthorisedValues should not handle the selected option Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org >From C4::Koha::GetAuthorisedValues # TODO: the "selected" feature should be replaced by a utility function # somewhere else, it doesn't belong in here. For starters it makes # caching much more complicated. Or just let the UI logic handle it, it's # what it's for. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 17505] New: REST API: Add route for messaging preferences
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Aug '25

11 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17505 Bug ID: 17505 Summary: REST API: Add route for messaging preferences Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Web services Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lari.taskula(a)jns.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org REST API: Add route for messaging preferences -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 42

[Bug 18657] New: Inventory tool should display more
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 04 Aug '25

04 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18657 Bug ID: 18657 Summary: Inventory tool should display more Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Currently the tool reports: Incorrect not-for-loan values Wrong place Checked out We should have: Optional display of items w/o problems Display of missing/lost items now marked found -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 24

[Bug 16943] New: OverduesBlockCheckout ask for confirmation once per session
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 01 Aug '25

01 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16943 Bug ID: 16943 Summary: OverduesBlockCheckout ask for confirmation once per session Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: arm(a)hanover.ca QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Just a minor suggestion... OverduesBlockCheckout has an option to 'ask for confirmation'. When checking out to a patron with any overdue items, the prompt to confirm comes up for each and every item you check out. I would prefer it to appear for staff confirmation just once for the current patron checkout session, the same as the AllFinesNeedOverride prompt does. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 11

[Bug 19532] New: Recalls for Koha
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 31 Jul '25

31 Jul '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19532 Bug ID: 19532 Summary: Recalls for Koha Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: Staff Client Assignee: aleisha(a)catalyst.net.nz Reporter: liz(a)catalyst.net.nz QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, liz(a)catalyst.net.nz Deadline: 2017-12-01 Preface: I know this will be quite an interesting feature for lots of people. Catalyst is doing a working proof of concept for this feature. The requirements we have given to Aleisha are firm, and we will not be scope creeping them. Additional features are welcome once this initial development is either accepted or supplanted by something else. That said, we welcome comment and suggestions on the patches we will attach here, and view this as a starting point instead of a complete solution. Expected scope of the feature to include: - Ability for borrowers to place a recall on a book from the OPAC results and detail, if it is checked out (question, do we offer to issue a recall if only one copy of say 3 is checked out?) - Ability for borrowers to see their requested recalls, and the when the book is expected to be returned back - An interface similar to holds for recalls, that alerts librarians that a book needs to go on the recall shelf (Recall for User, confirm or cancel) - An interface similar to holds waiting to show recalls that are currently on the shelf, and recalls that are requested but overdue, and ones that have expired and need to be reshelved. - A view in the intranet user interface for librarians to see a borrower's recalls (similar to holds) - Notices for borrower who has the recalled book on issue, to notify that the book's due date has changed and for the recaller, to let them know when the recalled item is ready for pick up. - Something in the circ rules that defines whether an item type/borrower category is allowed to place recalls on an item. - Sysprefs for "days from now that item is now due" and "how long do I let this recall languish on the recall shelf before reshelving" Current implementation notes: * DB: recalls table • DB: old_recalls table • notices: to user who has an item checked out that a recall request has been placed on, saying request has been made and due date has been updated (may use or build upon existing code from 17509) • notices: to user who made the recall request when it has been checked in, saying the item is awaiting pickup and must be picked up within X days (may use or build upon existing code from 17509) • OPAC: in checked out tab on user summary page, show your item has a recall placed on it, highlighting the new due date • OPAC: recall button under availability on record detail page and results page • OPAC: recalls tab on user summary page Per item type/borrower category combination: • circ rules: recall due date interval - what is the new due date of the item being recalled? How many days from the date of recall do we set the new due date? • circ rules: recall overdue fine - Do we have a special fine on an item that was recalled but not returned on time? (this may be a phase two feature) • circ rules: recall shelf time (how long can it be awaiting pickup before it needs to be reshelved) • circ rules OR syspref: do recalls automatically expire? (this may be a phase two feature) • circ reports: overdue recalls • circ reports: recalls awaiting pickup / recalls waiting over X days • circ reports: recalls queue • intranet: recalls tab on member detail page, showing recalls that the borrower has requested. • intranet: highlight on checkout and detail page items with a recall due date. • intranet: alert when checking in an item with a recall -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1192

[Bug 16122] New: Item record needs to keep Local Use count
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Jul '25

29 Jul '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16122 Bug ID: 16122 Summary: Item record needs to keep Local Use count Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Like the "issues" field in the items table, there should be a field for "local_use" to keep the count of local uses. While this information is kept in the statistics table, it is a task to acquire, and if a library wants to keep bloat down on their tables, the statistics are pruned on a regular schedule, which means loss of valuable data. This counter would keep that valuable information in one field in each item record, rather than having a separate field for each instance in the statistics table. Unless it is vital to someone to know the exact moment a local use occurred, I am suggesting that this piece of information not be recorded in the statistics table any longer. This would significantly reduce the growth of the statistics table in general. Christopher -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 163