April 2019 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 17510] New: marc modification templates ignore subfield $0
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Nov '20

02 Nov '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17510 Bug ID: 17510 Summary: marc modification templates ignore subfield $0 Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: hagud(a)orex.es QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We have realized that Koha MArc modification templates ignore subfield 0, it is not very common used subfield, it is working with subfields greater than 0 We have create a template for adding 773$0 (host biblionumber in analytics) but the template doesn't get the subfield and only stores main tag 773. Checked in: Koha 3.22 & 16.05.05 Debian 8 and plack enabled TEST Go to Tools --> MARC modification templates Create one rule. Add/Update field 773 0 with value 'demo' save it you can check that subfield is not appearing in the descrption, if you edit it appears, but when you try to execute thah template, and try to previwe the marc you get internal error and get the following log. This action is not implemented yet at /usr/share/koha/lib/Koha/SimpleMARC.pm line 169. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 29

[Bug 22106] New: Column settings needs to include OPAC and Intranet holds (requests) tables
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '20

30 Oct '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22106 Bug ID: 22106 Summary: Column settings needs to include OPAC and Intranet holds (requests) tables Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- The hold request tables need to be included in the Column settings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 20342] New: Fix table locking issue, progress bar not updating, and allow use of plack for Stage MARC Import
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 30 Oct '20

30 Oct '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20342 Bug ID: 20342 Summary: Fix table locking issue, progress bar not updating, and allow use of plack for Stage MARC Import Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Have you ever seen this error? DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Deadlock found when trying to get lock; try restarting transaction [for Statement "INSERT INTO import_record_matches (import_record_id, candidate_match_id, score), Have you ever noticed your progress bar during stage for import jumps from 0% to 100% with no updates in between? Would you like stage-marc-import.pl to work under plack? If you answered yes to any of the following questions, this bug is for you! During uploads of large records using matching rules, we were getting 'Failed to submit form' popups on the marc record importer. First, I noticed that the parent process of stage-marc-import.pl wasn't returning the job id via ajax until the child process had completed. This works fine for smaller files as they process fast. For large files ( and in particular when using matching rules ) the process takes *much* longer. It appears that $.ajax will resubmit the form if it doesn't get a response back in a given time ( I would estimate that to be about 30 seconds or so ). This causes a *second* instance of stage-marc-import.pl to be run. So now we have two processes both running transactions on the same table for the same batch id. I believe this is what is causing the Deadlock. So, the crux of the matter is that for whatever reason, the parent process will not output until the child process has gone away. Hours of research entailed. The final answer is that the child process must be detached from the parent process. I tried doing this via setsid() but it did not help. Finally, I found that using Net::Server::Daemonize did! After I had my solution, I decided to see if stage-marc-import.pl and background-job-progress.pl could now be run under plack, and it appears that they can! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 33

[Bug 18958] New: If patron has multiple record level holds on one record transferring first hold causes next hold to become item level
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 26 Oct '20

26 Oct '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18958 Bug ID: 18958 Summary: If patron has multiple record level holds on one record transferring first hold causes next hold to become item level Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Imagine you have a record with 3 items, each item is held by LibraryA, LibraryB and LibraryC respectively. Now, a patron places to record level holds for pickup at LibraryD. When any of the items are checked in, that item is trapped to fill the first hold, but a side affect is that the next open hold because item level for the item that was just checked in! This is clearly incorrect and prevents the patron from placing more record level holds on the record. To reproduce: 1. Create and use a patron that can place multiple record level holds per record 2. Create a record with X items, each at a different library 3. Place X 'Next available' holds on the record for the patron using the 'Holds to place' box 4. Check in LibraryA's copy as LibraryA and confirm the hold 5. Revisit request.pl for the record, notice the next hold in line is now item-specific 6. Attempt to place another hold for your patron, notice that it requires an item-specific hold -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 119

[Bug 22612] New: opac-auth.tt should contain OpacLoginInstructions
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Oct '20

23 Oct '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22612 Bug ID: 22612 Summary: opac-auth.tt should contain OpacLoginInstructions Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: hagud(a)orex.es QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- Good morning I think that opac-auth.tt should also include [% IF Koha.Preference( 'OpacLoginInstructions' ) %] <div id="nologininstructions-main" class="nologininstructions"> [% Koha.Preference( 'OpacLoginInstructions' ) %] </div> [% END %] This add login instrucctions, it appears for example in opac-main.tt or masthed.inc but on opac-auth.tt there is no login instructions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 22750] New: Partial writeoff of lost fee causes item to be returned
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Oct '20

22 Oct '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22750 Bug ID: 22750 Summary: Partial writeoff of lost fee causes item to be returned Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 18.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- To test: - Set system preference MarkLostItemAsReturned to not mark items as returned - Set system preference WhenLostChargeReplacementFee to charge - Find an item with a non-zero replacement cost - Check item out to patron - Mark item as lost - Confirm item is still in patron checkouts and patron has a lost fee for item - Write off part of the lost fee - Confirm the item no longer shows in patron checkouts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 31

[Bug 19718] New: Create message for patrons with multiple holds on the same item
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Oct '20

21 Oct '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19718 Bug ID: 19718 Summary: Create message for patrons with multiple holds on the same item Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 17.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: karen(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com One of our partners allows 3 holds per record. They have noticed that patrons will place multiple holds on an item that they have already placed on hold. They would like for Koha to display a message to the patron when they place a hold on an item they already have on hold. Their suggested message is "You already have placed a hold on this record. Are you sure you want to place another?" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 24

[Bug 20280] New: Authorised value categories list in bibliographic frameworks has 2 empty entries
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Oct '20

21 Oct '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20280 Bug ID: 20280 Summary: Authorised value categories list in bibliographic frameworks has 2 empty entries Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com To test: - Edit a subfield in any of your bibliographic frameworks - In the last section, take a look at the authorised value categories list - Confirm there are 2 empty entries Tested with sample data. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 14

[Bug 18420] New: t/dbdependent/Budgets.t fails without patron category 'S'
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Oct '20

20 Oct '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18420 Bug ID: 18420 Summary: t/dbdependent/Budgets.t fails without patron category 'S' Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz Reporter: veron(a)veron.ch QA Contact: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com If no patron category 'S' is defined, t/dbdependent/Budgets.t fails. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 48

[Bug 17458] New: ID of logged user is displayed when just consult an invoice (parcel.pl)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Oct '20

20 Oct '20

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17458 Bug ID: 17458 Summary: ID of logged user is displayed when just consult an invoice (parcel.pl) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: marjorie.barry-vila(a)ccsr.qc.ca QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Hi, When we just consult receipt summary (parcel.pl), the ID of logged user is displayed in field "Received by" But effective receipt were done by someone else. Id of user who done receipt is logged somewhere? Regards, Marjorie -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 21