July 2019 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 23214] New: OPAC add ability to pay guarantees fines
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Dec '19

11 Dec '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23214 Bug ID: 23214 Summary: OPAC add ability to pay guarantees fines Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: agustinmoyano(a)theke.io QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: tomascohen(a)gmail.com Depends on: 20691 Blocks: 20211, 23213 Target Milestone: --- Add ability in OPAC to pay guarantees fines Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20211 [Bug 20211] Guarantor/Guarantee and payments ideas [OMNIBUS] https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20691 [Bug 20691] Add ability for guarantors to view guarantee's fines in OPAC https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23213 [Bug 23213] OPAC check mimimum payment threshold from payment plugin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 26

[Bug 22427] New: Frequency Units do not accommodate a 2x a week frequency
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Dec '19

11 Dec '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22427 Bug ID: 22427 Summary: Frequency Units do not accommodate a 2x a week frequency Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 18.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Serials Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: colin.campbell(a)ptfs-europe.com Target Milestone: --- When setting up a 2x a week serial, the frequency of 2x a week does not allow for correct Unit/Issues set up. Setting up a 2x a week frequency, 1. Unit = Week 2 Issues per Unit = 2 3. Units per Issue =.5 However, Koha does not accept a value of less than 1. Due to this, the frequency cannot be used as it is intended, Koha will predict the wrong frequency. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 18428] New: Duplicate key error in old_reserves table.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Dec '19

11 Dec '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18428 Bug ID: 18428 Summary: Duplicate key error in old_reserves table. Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Database Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: barton(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org I'm not exactly sure how we got ourseleves into this situation, but one of our libraries is getting the following error when trying to check in an item that is on hold: DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Duplicate entry '39' for key 'PRIMARY' [for Statement "INSERT INTO `old_reserves` ( `biblionumber`, `borrowernumber`, `branchcode`, `cancellationdate`, `expirationdate`, `found`, `itemnumber`, `itemtype`, `lowestPriority`, `notificationdate`, `priority`, `reminderdate`, `reserve_id`, `reservedate`, `reservenotes`, `suspend`, `suspend_until`, `timestamp`, `waitingdate`) VALUES ( ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ? )" with ParamValues: 0='11198', 1='693', 2='CFOT', 3=undef, 4=undef, 5='F', 6=undef, 7=undef, 8='0', 9=undef, 10=0, 11=undef, 12='39', 13='2017-04-13', 14='', 15='0', 16=undef, 17='2017-04-13 06:19:29', 18=undef] at /usr/share/perl5/DBIx/Class/Storage/DBI.pm line 1832. DBIx::Class::Storage::DBI::_dbh_execute(): Duplicate entry '39' for key 'PRIMARY' at /usr/share/koha/lib/Koha/Object.pm line 120 This is analogous to bug 18242 for old_issues. I wonder if we need to do the same thing for the deleted* tables. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 10

[Bug 20099] New: Filtering by Library returns incorrect results
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Dec '19

11 Dec '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20099 Bug ID: 20099 Summary: Filtering by Library returns incorrect results Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 17.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: dch(a)interleaf.ie QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org I have 3 libraries; AB; AB_C and AB_D If I Refine Search for Holding Library AB_C I get the correct results, all biblios which have at least one item in AB_C; similarly for Holding Library AB_D but if I Refine Search for Holding Library AB I get all biblios which have at least one item in AB, or AB_C or AB_D. The system is treating AB_C and AB_D as subsets of AB but AB_C is a completely different value to AB. The problem is the same in the staff interface. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 19355] New: Import patrons removes circulation notes
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Dec '19

11 Dec '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19355 Bug ID: 19355 Summary: Import patrons removes circulation notes Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 17.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: bc(a)interleaf.ie QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Existing circulation notes are removed from overwritten borrower records when importing via Tools > Import Patrons. Confirmed on 16.11 and 17.05 To test, select patron record and add circulation note. Create a test import file matching on the cardnumber, selecting overwrite. Patron attributes can be either option. When imported the record overlays correctly but removes the circulation note on the imported borrower record. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 17774] New: Acquisitions module getting internal server error when adding orders to basket - a case of barcode not autoincrementing (?)
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Dec '19

11 Dec '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17774 Bug ID: 17774 Summary: Acquisitions module getting internal server error when adding orders to basket - a case of barcode not autoincrementing (?) Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 16.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Acquisitions Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: eugenegf(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org In a new Koha 16.11 instance, when adding orders to basket with the following system preferences: a) AcqCreateItem = placing an order b) autoBarcode is set to generated in the form <branchcode>yymm0001. c) plack enabled d) 952$o has plugin 'barcode.pl' A barcode is not filled up (just clicked 'Add item' button) during adding of items since it is implicitly stated in the interface: "The autoBarcode system preference is set to hbyymmincr and items with blank barcodes will have barcodes generated upon save to database." However, when the order is being saved, I am getting internal server error. So, I have to click the Back button to go back to what I'm doing. And when I returned to the "add orders to basket" interface, and then click save to finish the transaction, I am able to finish the transaction, however, I now get two items ordered, first one with only the title and the second one has the title and the patron who suggested the material (see http://koha.1045719.n5.nabble.com/file/n5913371/acqui_internal_server_error…) Tried this in another server with same database, however I'm getting "Software error: DBIx::Class::Storage::DBI::_dbh_execute(): Column 'itemnumber' cannot be null at /usr/share/koha/lib/Koha/Acquisition/Order.pm line 68" But when brought to the Basket no., I can see the order. Delving into the plack-error message in the first server: No existing hbyymmincr barcodes found. Reverting to initial value. at /usr/share/koha/lib/C4/Barcodes/hbyymmincr.pm line 62. DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Duplicate entry 'DLSU-D16120002' for key 'itembarcodeidx' [for Statement "INSERT INTO items SET biblionumber = ?, biblioitemnumber = ?, barcode = ?, dateaccessioned = ?, booksellerid = ?, homebranch = ?, price = ?, replacementprice = ?, replacementpricedate = ?, datelastborrowed = ?, datelastseen = ?, stack = ?, notforloan = ?, damaged = ?, itemlost = ?, withdrawn = ?, itemcallnumber = ?, coded_location_qualifier = ?, restricted = ?, itemnotes = ?, itemnotes_nonpublic = ?, holdingbranch = ?, paidfor = ?, location = ?, permanent_location = ?, onloan = ?, issues = ?, renewals = ?, reserves = ?, cn_source = ?, cn_sort = ?, ccode = ?, itype = ?, materials = ?, uri = ?, enumchron = ?, more_subfields_xml = ?, copynumber = ?, stocknumber = ?, new_status = ? " with ParamValues: 0="4911", 1='4911', 2="DLSU-D16120002", 3='2016-12-14', 4=undef, 5="DLSU-D", 6=undef, 7=undef, 8='2016-12-14', 9=undef, 10='2016-12-14', 11=undef, 12=0, 13=0, 14=0, 15=0, 16=undef, 17=undef, 18=undef, 19=undef, 20=undef, 21="DLSU-D", 22=undef, 23=undef, 24=undef, 25=undef, 26=undef, 27=undef, 28=undef, 29="lcc", 30='', 31=undef, 32=undef, 33=undef, 34=undef, 35=undef, 36=undef, 37=undef, 38=undef, 39=undef] at /usr/share/koha/lib/C4/Items.pm line 2119. DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Column 'itemnumber' cannot be null [for Statement "INSERT INTO `aqorders_items` ( `itemnumber`, `ordernumber`) VALUES ( ?, ? )" with ParamValues: 0=undef, 1='45'] at /usr/share/perl5/DBIx/Class/Storage/DBI.pm line 1832. And the second server's intranet error log snippet: [Wed Dec 14 18:15:55.903548 2016] [cgi:error] [pid 19570] [client 112.198.75.180:54634] AH01215: [Wed Dec 14 18:15:55 2016] addorder.pl: " with ParamValues: 0="4914", 1='4913', 2="DLSU-D16120002", 3='2016-12-14', 4=undef, 5="DLSU-D", 6=undef, 7=undef, 8='2016-12-14', 9=undef, 10='2016-12-14', 11=undef, 12=0, 13=0, 14=0, 15=0, 16=undef, 17=undef, 18=undef, 19=undef, 20=undef, 21="DLSU-D", 22=undef, 23=undef, 24=undef, 25=undef, 26=undef, 27=undef, 28=undef, 29="lcc", 30='', 31=undef, 32=undef, 33=undef, 34=undef, 35=undef, 36=undef, 37=undef, 38=undef, 39=undef] at /usr/share/koha/lib/C4/Items.pm line 2119. I feel that the barcode is not auto-incrementing (but I don't know why it isn't) as I see in the first server the same barcode 'DLSU-D16120002' is showing up several times, and this is supposed to be incremented. I also see that this barcode is already used by another item. A discussion of this is in http://koha.1045719.n5.nabble.com/Acquisitions-module-internal-server-error… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 19789] New: Remove some indirect DBIx calls from updatedatabase
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Dec '19

11 Dec '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19789 Bug ID: 19789 Summary: Remove some indirect DBIx calls from updatedatabase Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Triggered by a comment on 19096. What happens when DBIx schema does not match table design? Add a field to schema file that does not exist => Koha::Object->new and store still works, Koha::Objects->search still works but an actual fetch by calling ->next is enough to crash. DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Unknown column 'me.iserniet' in 'field list' Add a field to the table but not to the schema file => Seems to work still Dubious lines in updatedatabase L12389 Koha::SearchEngine::Elasticsearch->reset_elasticsearch_mappings; This includes Koha Objects calls to Koha::SearchFields and Koha::SearchMarcMaps. The sub add_to_search_marc_maps in Koha::SearchField puzzles me. Does this work, why is there no test associated with it ? Any (future) new column in search fields or search marc maps may lead to a crash at 3.23.00.050 L13526 and context: Koha::Number::Price->new( $order->{rrp} )->round; Only new calls seem to be fine. But might be tricky. L14364 and context: Koha::Holds->search({ found => 'W', priority => 0 }); Any future change in reserves table may lead to a crash on the next statement in 16.12.00.032. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 9

[Bug 23184] New: Export/bibs/holdings settings unclear for exporting bibs without any holdings
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 11 Dec '19

11 Dec '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23184 Bug ID: 23184 Summary: Export/bibs/holdings settings unclear for exporting bibs without any holdings Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 18.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Tools Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: bwsdonna(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- By default, Koha will not export bibs without items as the "owned by libraries" check boxes are selected. This is unclear to users. If I upload a file of bibs to export, and don't uncheck the library boxes, the resulting mrc file will only contain records that have items, all bib records without items will not be included. The check boxes should either be empty by default, or a clarification note should be added stating that itemless bibs will not be exported. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 17

[Bug 22677] New: Include hint on OAI-PMH URL for Koha in system preference
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Dec '19

10 Dec '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22677 Bug ID: 22677 Summary: Include hint on OAI-PMH URL for Koha in system preference Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Keywords: Academy Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Web services Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- We should include a link to the right URL like we do for other things like ILS-DI and Self checkout in the description of the OAI-PMH system preference. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 17

[Bug 22923] New: Items search does not take care of independent branches
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 10 Dec '19

10 Dec '19

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22923 Bug ID: 22923 Summary: Items search does not take care of independent branches Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- Items search /cgi-bin/koha/catalogue/itemsearch.pl should be impacted by preference IndependentBranches. Maybe it should automatically limit to current branch. Main problem is that actually its a way to edit items of other branches. Maybe there should also be a check in cataloguing/additem.pl itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 11