May 2022 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 19889] New: localholdspriority needs exclusions
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 22 Aug '25

22 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19889 Bug ID: 19889 Summary: localholdspriority needs exclusions Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com localholdspriority is great, unless you have a unique or rare collection that is popular. If you have such a collection, and ongoing holds are being placed on it to be picked up at several locations, only the patrons at that library will ever get their hands on it unless a patron is smart enough and willing to pickup the item at that location. I would propose an exclusion preference, that would exclude listed patron categories, item types, formats, or specific items. Any other item criteria or factors that I missed could be added to this list. Currently we have patrons at other libraries that will never get the items they have requested. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 137

[Bug 26227] New: Allow to enter copyright statement for uploaded local cover images
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Aug '25

21 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26227 Bug ID: 26227 Summary: Allow to enter copyright statement for uploaded local cover images Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We have libraries that need to add a copyright statement to the uploaded local covers. The statements can vary, so need to be image specific. It would be great if this feature could be built into the local cover images feature so that the copyright statement can be easily retrieved for display from the db. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 29127] New: Reminders for Suspended Holds
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Aug '25

21 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29127 Bug ID: 29127 Summary: Reminders for Suspended Holds Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com It would be nice to have either a definable notice or a pesky reminder in the OPAC (or both) when a patron has set a hold, suspended it, and forgot about it. Suspended holds can affect purchase decisions and decisions for patrons to place a hold. It would be great if the OPAC would display a reminder in the holds or like a news or message at the top of the account when an item has been suspended for X amount of days, and a notice that does the same. So, libraries could remind patrons after 6 months, and send a notice after a year. It would also be great if libraries could set if a suspended hold just goes away after a set amount of time, or not at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 28322] New: Did you mean feature does not work with Elasticsearch
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 21 Aug '25

21 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28322 Bug ID: 28322 Summary: Did you mean feature does not work with Elasticsearch Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: caroline.cyr-la-rose(a)inlibro.com Hi all! We just upgraded one of our clients to Elasticsearch and they happened to use the Did you mean feature. It seems Did you mean only works with Zebra. It's trying to connect to Zebra. This is in opac-error.log suggestion: oAuth error: Connect failed (10000) unix:/home/i/koha/alma-test-inlibro/var/run/zebradb/authoritysocket ZOOM: /inlibro/git/koha-alma-test-inlibro/opac/svc/suggestion, referer: http://alma-test.hapax.inlibro.net/cgi-bin/koha/opac-search.pl?q=chat (btw, "chat" is "cat" in french :D ) I think we should at the very least put a warning on the admin page for the Did you mean feature that it only works with Zebra. Otherwise make the feature engine agnostic so that we can use it with either Zebra or ElasticSearch. I don't know if Did you mean with elastic is necessary as there is a bz for autocomplete with ElasticSearch which does practically the same thing. (see bug 27113). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 29880] New: Add_items permission needed for patrons
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Aug '25

19 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29880 Bug ID: 29880 Summary: Add_items permission needed for patrons Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jendayi30(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Currently, the edit_items permission allows users to both add and edit items. We have a central department that does all the library processing and we'd like to ensure that only the staff in that department be allowed to add items in order to ensure consistency and quality in our records. Ideally, the central department would be able to use the add_items and edit_items option and our staff on the campuses would be able to edit_items only (combined with the edit_items_restricted option). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 24412] New: Attach waiting reserve to desk
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Aug '25

19 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24412 Bug ID: 24412 Summary: Attach waiting reserve to desk Change sponsored?: Sponsored Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nicolas.legrand(a)bulac.fr QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com, severine.queune(a)bulac.fr Depends on: 24201 When an item is checked in and marked 'Waiting' or already 'Waiting' and there is a desk attached to the session, the item is marked waiting at the current desk of the current library. The information is displayed on the OPAC and on the intranet. The patron can then know at which desk he can retrieve his document. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24201 [Bug 24201] Attach desk to intranet session -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 154

[Bug 25161] New: Can not edit relationship or guarantee of guarantor from the guarantee form
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Aug '25

19 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25161 Bug ID: 25161 Summary: Can not edit relationship or guarantee of guarantor from the guarantee form Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 19.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com With the introduction of multiple guarantors to guarantees, bug 14570, now in 19.11, the relationship can not be edited from the guarantee from. Previously, a relationship and the actual guarantor could be edited from the guarantee form. Now in 19.11, there is no way to edit or change the guarantor from the guarantee form. The option that exists in 19.11 is to remove the guarantor not to edit. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 28655] New: new ideas/proposal to enhance pluggability
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 18 Aug '25

18 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28655 Bug ID: 28655 Summary: new ideas/proposal to enhance pluggability Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Plugin architecture Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: koha(a)trust-box.at QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org see discussion to 28026 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 24

[Bug 27599] New: Fine calculation at checkin should be able reflect return claims
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Aug '25

15 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27599 Bug ID: 27599 Summary: Fine calculation at checkin should be able reflect return claims Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Depends on: 14697 Here's the existing behavior: 1- checkout item with date due in the past 2- run fines cron to create accruing fine 3- mark item claimed without charging lost fee 4- fines does not change at all when item is marked claimed 5- check item in 6- fine goes from accruing to final as if the claim had never happened If we assume some time passes between step 3 and step 5, that could be a significant difference in the final fine total. Should patrons be charged overdue fines for the period between when an item is Claimed Returned and when it is actually checked in? Should that be configurable per library? Should it in some way depend on the claim resolution status? If we *do* charge the lost fee when an item is marked claimed, then we close the fine at the point of claim and it is not changed if the item is later checked in. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14697 [Bug 14697] Extend and enhance "Claims returned" lost status -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 25318] New: Convert authorities_js.inc to JavaScript file with translatable strings
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 15 Aug '25

15 Aug '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25318 Bug ID: 25318 Summary: Convert authorities_js.inc to JavaScript file with translatable strings Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Templates Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Now that we can translate strings in JavaScript we can convert authorities_js.inc into a JavaScript file with language strings updated with the new JS translation function. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 23