March 2024 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 30198] New: Add privacy elements to reports
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 23 Jun '25

23 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30198 Bug ID: 30198 Summary: Add privacy elements to reports Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 21.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Reports Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: bwsdonna(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Any staff member who has access to run reports potentially has the ability to see data they are not typically permitted to view. It would be really helpful to be able to add limits to reports to restrict who has permission to view/run the reports. For instance, as a circulation clerk, I may need to run a report of patrons that have overdue items with holds on them, so I can contact the patron about returning the item. However, since I have the ability to view/run all reports, I potentially could access reports that have patron reading history, or financial info in them. Likewise, if I am in a consortium/multi-library setting, and do not have the permission to view patron data from other libraries, in the reports module I can run reports that contain patron data from any of the other libraries. I imagine something along the lines of funds access in acquisitions - owner, user, library, and being able to limit to any of those elements. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 25

[Bug 30650] New: Convert the Curbside Pickup plugin to Koha core
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Jun '25

20 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30650 Bug ID: 30650 Summary: Convert the Curbside Pickup plugin to Koha core Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: new feature Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com Reporter: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com The plugin is great and people would like to see it part of Koha. https://github.com/bywatersolutions/koha-plugin-curbside-pickup -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 203

[Bug 34947] New: Koha Manual search does not bring user to the relevant place in the page
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Jun '25

20 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34947 Bug ID: 34947 Summary: Koha Manual search does not bring user to the relevant place in the page Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Documentation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: aude.charillon(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When clicking on a result in the Koha Manual search, the user lands at the top of the page rather than where the keyword appears. This is very unhelpful. Users are having to either do a "search within page" after clicking on the result; or run their search from a separate search engine in order to get to the relevant section in the Manual page. To replicate the issue: 1) Go to the Koha Manual, e.g. https://koha-community.org/manual/latest/en/html/index.html 2) In the search box, enter "on shelf holds". 3) Click on either of the first three results (Administration, Cataloging, Circulation). 4) Observe that you always land at the top of the page rather than where the search keywords first appear. Is there anything that can be done to improve this, please? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 36344] New: Add schema changes summary to release notes
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Jun '25

20 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36344 Bug ID: 36344 Summary: Add schema changes summary to release notes Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Documentation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: r.delahunty(a)arts.ac.uk QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org The community release notes have summaries at the end for new and deleted system preferences and new authorised values and letter codes but none for schema changes. A list of new/deleted tables and one for new/renamed/deleted columns in tables would be useful. For example, issues.renewals became issues.renewals_count in 21.11 but this change was buried in bug 30275 (and reports broke as we missed mention of the change). And the schema change in bug 26057 altered the meaning of ‘missing in transit’ as we had defined it in our MIT reports (so they broke too). Schema changes are now included in our ‘upgrade pain-points’ and we will look very closely at them. A summary of the changes would be very useful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 36391] New: There is no listing of the cron job : archive_purchase_suggestions in the manual
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Jun '25

20 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36391 Bug ID: 36391 Summary: There is no listing of the cron job : archive_purchase_suggestions in the manual Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Documentation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org There is no listing of the cron job: archive_purchase_suggestions in the current manual. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 33793] New: Add method to define limited access to run reports
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Jun '25

20 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33793 Bug ID: 33793 Summary: Add method to define limited access to run reports Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Reports Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrewfh(a)dubcolib.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Currently a user with the execute_reports permission can run any report in the system. A library may wish for a given user to be able run some reports but not others. It would be great to have a mechanism for allowing limited reports access. Maybe something akin to the SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEditing preference? We could create ReportGroupsToAllowForRestrictedExecution, in which one selects groups of reports. We add a new execute_reports_restricted permission. A user with that permission can only run reports in the groups specified in the preference. Or maybe ditch the system preference and add a "restricted access" flag to each report? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 32610] New: Add ability to specify patron attribute as a date and apply flatpickr
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 20 Jun '25

20 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32610 Bug ID: 32610 Summary: Add ability to specify patron attribute as a date and apply flatpickr Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 22.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com Sometimes libraries use patron extended attributes that are dates. It would be handy if we could specify that a particular attribute is a date and then have it become a flatpickr instance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 94

[Bug 34301] New: Agreements_spec.ts is failing randomly
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Jun '25

19 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34301 Bug ID: 34301 Summary: Agreements_spec.ts is failing randomly Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz Reporter: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Blocks: 25551 koha_1 | Running: ERM/Agreements_spec.ts (1 of 6) koha_1 | [11894:0713/195038.469535:ERROR:cert_verify_proc_builtin.cc(681)] CertVerifyProcBuiltin for redirector.gvt1.com failed: koha_1 | ----- Certificate i=0 (OU=Cypress Proxy Server Certificate,O=Cypress Proxy CA,L=Internet,ST=Internet,C=Internet,CN=redirector.gvt1.com) ----- koha_1 | ERROR: No matching issuer found koha_1 | koha_1 | koha_1 | [11894:0713/195039.293777:ERROR:cert_verify_proc_builtin.cc(681)] CertVerifyProcBuiltin for r2---sn-4g5ednsd.gvt1.com failed: koha_1 | ----- Certificate i=0 (OU=Cypress Proxy Server Certificate,O=Cypress Proxy CA,L=Internet,ST=Internet,C=Internet,CN=r2---sn-4g5ednsd.gvt1.com) ----- koha_1 | ERROR: No matching issuer found koha_1 | koha_1 | koha_1 | Browserslist: caniuse-lite is outdated. Please run: koha_1 | npx browserslist@latest --update-db koha_1 | koha_1 | Why you should do it regularly: koha_1 | https://github.com/browserslist/browserslist#browsers-data-updating koha_1 | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> koha_1 | <testsuites name="Mocha Tests" time="38.2310" tests="5" failures="1"> koha_1 | <testsuite name="Root Suite" timestamp="2023-07-13T19:50:41" tests="0" file="t/cypress/integration/ERM/Agreements_spec.ts" time="0.0000" failures="0"> koha_1 | </testsuite> koha_1 | <testsuite name="Agreement CRUD operations" timestamp="2023-07-13T19:50:41" tests="5" time="38.2310" failures="1"> koha_1 | <testcase name="Agreement CRUD operations List agreements" time="11.1430" classname="List agreements"> koha_1 | </testcase> koha_1 | <testcase name="Agreement CRUD operations Add agreement" time="15.8900" classname="Add agreement"> koha_1 | </testcase> koha_1 | <testcase name="Agreement CRUD operations Edit agreement" time="0.0000" classname="Edit agreement"> koha_1 | <failure message="Timed out retrying after 5000ms: `cy.wait()` timed out waiting `5000ms` for the 1st request to the route: `get-single-agreement-search-result`. No request ever occurred. koha_1 | koha_1 | https://on.cypress.io/wait" type="CypressError"><![CDATA[CypressError: Timed out retrying after 5000ms: `cy.wait()` timed out waiting `5000ms` for the 1st request to the route: `get-single-agreement-search-result`. No request ever occurred. koha_1 | koha_1 | https://on.cypress.io/wait koha_1 | at cypressErr (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at Object.errByPath (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at checkForXhr (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:… koha_1 | at tryCatcher (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at Function.Promise.attempt.Promise.try (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at whenStable (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:… koha_1 | at tryCatcher (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at Promise._settlePromiseFromHandler (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at Promise._settlePromise (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at Promise._settlePromise0 (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at Promise._settlePromises (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at Promise._fulfill (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:…) koha_1 | at http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/runner/cypress_runner.js:… koha_1 | From Your Spec Code: koha_1 | at Context.eval (http://kohadev-intra.mydnsname.org:8081/__cypress/tests?p=t/cypress/integra…)></failure> koha_1 | </testcase> koha_1 | <testcase name="Agreement CRUD operations Show agreement" time="6.0050" classname="Show agreement"> koha_1 | </testcase> koha_1 | <testcase name="Agreement CRUD operations Delete agreement" time="5.1930" classname="Delete agreement"> koha_1 | </testcase> koha_1 | </testsuite> koha_1 | </testsuites> Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25551 [Bug 25551] [OMNIBUS] Some tests are failing randomly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 30254] New: New overdue fine applied to incorrectly when using "Refund lost item charge and charge new overdue fine" option in circ rules
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 19 Jun '25

19 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30254 Bug ID: 30254 Summary: New overdue fine applied to incorrectly when using "Refund lost item charge and charge new overdue fine" option in circ rules Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 21.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 - low Component: Fines and fees Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 23091 I've only confirmed this on 21.05. I haven't been able to replicate on master. When using the lost item fee refund feature to charge a new overdue fee when a lost item is found, Koha can end up creating an overdue fine on a patron who never actually had an overdue item. To recreate: - set Lost item fee refund on return policy to "Refund lost item charge and charge new overdue fine" - have an itemtype / patron combo that charges an overdue fine - check item out to patron and then right back in again - confirm patron doesn't have a fine because the item was not late - set the item to Missing - wait until after the item's due date from your previous checkout - check the item out to a new patron - confirm your original patron now has a fine When the item is checked out and Koha clears its missing status, it looks back for the most recent checkout in old_issues and generates an overdue fine as if that item had been checked out the whole time. Even though this item wasn't lost by a patron and the first patron never had an overdue fine on it. Things get more confusing if the first patron is anonymizing their reading history, as then the fine ends up on the anonymous borrower. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23091 [Bug 23091] Add options to charge new or restore forgiven overdues when a lost item is returned -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 38

[Bug 21935] New: Setup sip accounts through front end
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 18 Jun '25

18 Jun '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21935 Bug ID: 21935 Summary: Setup sip accounts through front end Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: SIP2 Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: cbrannon(a)cdalibrary.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: colin.campbell(a)ptfs-europe.com Currently, it is necessary to setup an account in Koha for a sip connection and then do some setup for the same account on the backend (I do not know all the details). It would be great if there were a way to setup sip accounts via the patron account, that would eliminate the need to monkey with stuff on the backend. Ideally, it would be nice to have an area to setup sip accounts that is separate from regular patron accounts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 4