June 2024 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 20732] New: Display the note tab for records without items.
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20732 Bug ID: 20732 Summary: Display the note tab for records without items. Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: patrick.robitaille(a)collecto.ca QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Hi, when we have a record who have no items, it would be great to displays the note tab first instead of holdings. It would be useful for the records of electronic resources who don't have items. Having the notes tab put forward would avoid one more click for relevant information. It could be a system preference like opacSerialDefaultTab but for the records without items. Thanks, Patrick. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 33312] New: Add circulation and fines rules table from smart-rules.pl to column settings
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33312 Bug ID: 33312 Summary: Add circulation and fines rules table from smart-rules.pl to column settings Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lisette.scheer(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com It would be very helpful to be able to configure hiding columns as libraries rarely (if ever) use all the columns (suspensions vs fines, etc.) Lisette -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 28

[Bug 37206] New: Removing an item from a label batch should be a CSRF-protected POST operation
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37206 Bug ID: 37206 Summary: Removing an item from a label batch should be a CSRF-protected POST operation Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Label/patron card printing Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 36192 >From Labels -> Manage label batches -> Edit batch, the list of items in the batch has a "Delete" button for each item. Currently it's a GET operation sent via a link, but I think that should be POSTed. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36192 [Bug 36192] [OMNIBUS] CSRF Protection for Koha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 14

[Bug 30657] New: Make patron attributes available via Template Toolkit in overdues
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30657 Bug ID: 30657 Summary: Make patron attributes available via Template Toolkit in overdues Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When using Template Toolkit to fetch patron values, one should be able to fetch patron attribute values. This would be useful both for printing those values into the notice content and for using those values in logic to vary the notices per patron. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 100

[Bug 25408] New: CanBookBeReserved should check "opacitemholds" policy
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25408 Bug ID: 25408 Summary: CanBookBeReserved should check "opacitemholds" policy Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: arthur.suzuki(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com how to reproduce : Set an issuing rule with opacitemholds set to "Force" Make a search and select multiple records Place a hold on those records (using multi-hold records) Verify hold is placed on the record (next item available) where it shouldn't! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 161

[Bug 29445] New: Checking replace cover image should actually replace cover image
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Oct '26

28 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29445 Bug ID: 29445 Summary: Checking replace cover image should actually replace cover image Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 21.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: estherm(a)sodaspringsid.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl To duplicate: In this scenario, the Coce image service pulls the incorrect cover image. 1. System setting AllowMultipleCovers is set to allow and CoceProviders is set to all. 2. Upload a new image cover and select replace cover image. 3. Check the normal view in the staff client and see that the new image displays as the default image and the Coce image displays as a second hidden image that can be selected to view. 4. Check OPAC view, both images continue to be displayed. Repeat these steps but set AllowMultipleCovers to not allow. Both images continue to be displayed. I would have expected that by checking replace cover image that the cover image is actually replaced. Instead it looks like ticking that box sort of makes the image the first image that is displayed but doesn't actually replace. As for the setting AllowMultiple Covers - this needs clarification. Ideally a bib record should allow multiple images but with the option to select the default cover image and the ability to not show the Coce image if it is not correct. This may be related to ticket 29359 and 26933. It looks like additional cover image tools or preferences are needed. Selecting a default image, actually replacing a cover image in place of the Coce image, deleting an image, selecting how many images show, etc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 19037] New: Circulation and fine rules test tool
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Oct '26

28 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19037 Bug ID: 19037 Summary: Circulation and fine rules test tool Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lari.taskula(a)jns.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Add a test tool for circulation and fine rules. The point of the tool is to display the effective issuing rule that matches item, patron and branch. Add a REST API endpoint to query effective issuing rules by given parameters. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 77

[Bug 27834] New: CircControl syspref is used wrong in TooMany function C4::Circulation
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Oct '26

28 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27834 Bug ID: 27834 Summary: CircControl syspref is used wrong in TooMany function C4::Circulation Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Circulation Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: joonas.kylmala(a)helsinki.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com The CircControl syspref description says > Use the checkout and fines rules of > PickupLibrary: the library you are logged in at. > PatronLibrary: the library the patron is from. > ItemHomeLibrary: the library the item is from. This is mostly true but there is one exception in the TooMany function where it actually doesn't just change which libraries rules are used but how the the calculation is performed. With PatronLibrary set the behaviour is as expected by reading the syspref description. However with the setting PickupLibrary the behaviour changes now, instead of just using the rules of the pickup library we also only take into account the loans in the pickup library when calculating whether we are over the checkout limit or not. The same happens with ItemHomeLibrary where we instead calculate the patron's checkouts in the home library of the item being checked out. We should really try to fix this either by a) showing that ItemHomeLibrary and PickupLibrary is unacceptable and no one actually wants that, that would allow then making the behaviour similar as what it is to PatronLibrary (so just selecting the right circ rule instead of changing calculation method). b) Provide a new syspref for changing the calcutation method when PickupLibrary or ItemHomeLibrary CircControl values are used, and set it on upgrade enabled as default. Ps. svc/letters/preview might use CirControl wrongly as well, I'm not 100% I didn't quite understand but as for other usages of CircControl syspref I grepped where it was used and it correctly only changed the circ rules to be used instead of changing behaviour. So in addition to TooMany we might have to do some changes to svc/letters/preview if it turns out it changes behaviour as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 50

[Bug 37172] New: HoldItem and HoldTitle do not check all the values of "hold_fulfillment_policy" rule
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Oct '26

28 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37172 Bug ID: 37172 Summary: HoldItem and HoldTitle do not check all the values of "hold_fulfillment_policy" rule Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Web services Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: arthur.suzuki(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org values "homebranch" and "holdingbranch" are not checked, leading to forbidden holds to be put from the ILS-DI interface. I think the controls on "hold_fulfillment_policy" should be done in "CanItemBeReserved" rather than "CheckReserves". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 23849] New: Update the list of sysprefs to share with Hea
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Oct '26

28 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23849 Bug ID: 23849 Summary: Update the list of sysprefs to share with Hea Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart(a)bugs.koha-community.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org We have a lot of sysprefs that are not recorded in Hea. We lack a process to keep the list up-to-date. We are going to have an updated list for 19.11. For next releases it should be a new post release task (https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Post_major_release_tasks) This bug report could be reused for the next releases. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 85