July 2024 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 19859] New: Add option to return to the search result in authorities
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 07 Jan '25

07 Jan '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19859 Bug ID: 19859 Summary: Add option to return to the search result in authorities Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: patrick.robitaille(a)collecto.ca QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl Hi, It is imposible to return to hte result search when you edit an authorities in a record. When we want to edit an authorities in a record, we can clic on the tag editor. That option will open a search page. In this search page you can search authorities. If you clic on edit authorities that action will be open into the authorities module. If you clic on save, you stay in authorities module and you don't return on the search page of the tag editor. Because of that, if you had made some changes in the authoritie, you can't clic on choose for linking to the record. To recreate: Go to a record Edit an authoritie with tag editor Search an authoritie with this plugin Choose an authoritie and clic on edit authorities Clic on Save Notice that you still in the authorities modul and you can’t link this authoritie in your record. For make this link you have to "go back" two times ank clic on choose or make this search another time. Patrick. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 18595] New: Move C4::Members::Messaging to Koha namespace
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Jan '25

06 Jan '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18595 Bug ID: 18595 Summary: Move C4::Members::Messaging to Koha namespace Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Reporter: lari.taskula(a)jns.fi QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Bug 17499 adds Koha-objects for messaging preferences. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 159

[Bug 36454] New: Staff - Provide indication if a patron is expired when creating an ILL request
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Jan '25

06 Jan '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36454 Bug ID: 36454 Summary: Staff - Provide indication if a patron is expired when creating an ILL request Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ILL Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com CC: katrin.fischer(a)bsz-bw.de, martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com, nick(a)bywatersolutions.com, pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com, rebecca.bradshaw(a)nnuh.nhs.uk, tomascohen(a)gmail.com Creating an ILL request, when staff adds a patron, there is no indication that the patron is expired, if said patron is indeed expired. Part of the problem tackling this, I believe, is that the 'create form' is ILL backend specific, so this should be tackled at each ILL backend level. Having said that, with bug 35570 in the pipeline, we could perhaps consider adding this little enhancement as a follow-up to that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 47

[Bug 37478] New: bulkmarcimport.pl can die on bad records
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Jan '25

06 Jan '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37478 Bug ID: 37478 Summary: bulkmarcimport.pl can die on bad records Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Command-line Utilities Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: robin(a)catalyst.net.nz bulkmarcimport.pl will die on xml parsing errors when trying to convert the saved metadata (marcxml) back into a MARC::Record object Two cases we have seen are an invalid characters: :9: parser error : PCDATA invalid Char value 31 <controlfield tag="003">aPGcC</controlfield> and invalid/missing subfield: :91: parser error : attributes construct error <subfield code=""">Among nineteenth-century women's rights reformers, Elizab It turns out MARC::Record can read the incoming file - we can convert it to xml to save as metadata, but only on trying to create the record out of the xml do we die. This may point to a bug in MARC::Record -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 45

[Bug 36117] New: Can svc/bib_profile be removed?
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 06 Jan '25

06 Jan '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36117 Bug ID: 36117 Summary: Can svc/bib_profile be removed? Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Is this used? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 25323] New: Patrons can act as their own guarantor
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jan '25

03 Jan '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25323 Bug ID: 25323 Summary: Patrons can act as their own guarantor Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Patrons Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: david.roberts(a)ptfs-europe.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com, kyle.m.hall(a)gmail.com When searching for a patron to act as a guarantor, if the guarantee's record is returned it can be selected, therefore becoming his/her's own guarantor. This makes no sense. To reproduce: 1) Create two users, a parent and a child both with the same surname (for example Parent Smith and Child Smith) 2) Edit the child record and under the Guarantor information, use the "Search to add" button to search for a guarantor. 3) Search for Smith. Both Parent Smith and Child Smith will be listed in the results. 4) Select Child Smith and save the user record. Child Smith is now the guarantor for Child Smith. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 37460] New: Skip Issues Seems to Not Work for Subscriptions Using the Publication Date Parts
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Jan '25

03 Jan '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37460 Bug ID: 37460 Summary: Skip Issues Seems to Not Work for Subscriptions Using the Publication Date Parts Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 24.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Serials Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kelly(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Created attachment 169512 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=169512&action=e… pattern With bug 32392, a user can receive an issue and then skip the next issue or multiple issues. However, this does not seem to be working when using the bug [35646] Allows using the publication date parts for serial numbering. It will not skip an issue as instructed. Using this skip issues option for other numbering patterns does work, such as a simple Volume Number Issue. Attaching my Pattern for more clarification -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 26024] New: Purge undone of zebraqueue in cleanup_database.pl
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26024 Bug ID: 26024 Summary: Purge undone of zebraqueue in cleanup_database.pl Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Zebra Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com Purge script misc/cronjobs/cleanup_database.pl with --zebraqueue DAYS will delete entries from zebraqueue table with done=1 We now start to use Elasticsearch only so entries of zebraqueue with done=0 stay in database. I propose we purge all entries in cleanup_database.pl. Even with zebra, if indexing does not occur after several days (30 by default), there is a problem and one need a full rebuild. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 32168] New: Editing date/datetime fields without the dateaccessioned.pl plugin can cause errors
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32168 Bug ID: 32168 Summary: Editing date/datetime fields without the dateaccessioned.pl plugin can cause errors Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl When editing items that are date or datetime formatted without the dateaccessioned cataloging plugin it is quite easy to cause an error. To recreate: 1. Make sure some 952 field with dates (datelastseen, dateaccessioned ) are visible in the editor but make sure the dateaccessiond plugin is turned off. 2. Set the date format system preference to mm/dd/yyyy 3. Edit an item and attempt to edit one of the date fields to something in the correct dateformat, like 11/11/2018. 4. You get an error as Koha is expecting the SQL date type format of YYYY-MM-DD. I'm not sure how to best solve this. My first thought is that we should require the dateaccessioned.pl plugin on date fields. Or we could add a hint about format? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 20954] New: Add ability to set syspref overrides in SIP as we can in apache
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Jan '25

02 Jan '25

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20954 Bug ID: 20954 Summary: Add ability to set syspref overrides in SIP as we can in apache Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: SIP2 Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: kyle(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: colin.campbell(a)ptfs-europe.com We should be able to set system preference overrides for SIP in a similar manner that we do in Apache. It would be great if we could specify those overrides on both a config level, and login level basis. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 21