November 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 33312] New: Add circulation and fines rules table from smart-rules.pl to column settings
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33312 Bug ID: 33312 Summary: Add circulation and fines rules table from smart-rules.pl to column settings Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lisette.scheer(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com It would be very helpful to be able to configure hiding columns as libraries rarely (if ever) use all the columns (suspensions vs fines, etc.) Lisette -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 28

[Bug 39909] New: Batch modification with regex does not work with control fields
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39909 Bug ID: 39909 Summary: Batch modification with regex does not work with control fields Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Cataloging Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: fridolin.somers(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: m.de.rooy(a)rijksmuseum.nl In MARC modification templates if you define a copy of a control field into another control field. The regexp part does not work. Because of : https://git.koha-community.org/Koha-community/Koha/src/commit/83f8ba4eeed5c… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 26

[Bug 41273] New: xt/perltidy.t could use the same parallel handling as other tests
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41273 Bug ID: 41273 Summary: xt/perltidy.t could use the same parallel handling as other tests Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Test Suite Assignee: chris(a)bigballofwax.co.nz Reporter: martin.renvoize(a)openfifth.co.uk QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Some of our tests look for the number of CPU's in the environment they're running on and then split the tests to run in parallel. We could do that for xt/perltidy.t too and save time when running those tests locally. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 12

[Bug 41306] New: Date picker for data harvesting should ask not ask to choose a day
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41306 Bug ID: 41306 Summary: Date picker for data harvesting should ask not ask to choose a day Initiative type: --- Sponsorship --- status: Product: Koha Version: 24.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ERM Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com Reporter: mathsabypro(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com, jonathan.field(a)openfifth.co.uk, martin.renvoize(a)openfifth.co.uk, matt.blenkinsop(a)openfifth.co.uk, pedro.amorim(a)openfifth.co.uk In erm/eusage/usage_data_providers the date picker for data harvesting (begin and end date) should not ask to choose a day, only a month and a year. The day have no meaning in the context of sushi protocol. I have only checked in 24.11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 24

[Bug 38822] New: View easilty the months for which usage reports have been collected for a given source
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38822 Bug ID: 38822 Summary: View easilty the months for which usage reports have been collected for a given source Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: ERM Assignee: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com Reporter: mathsabypro(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: jonathan.druart(a)gmail.com, jonathan.field(a)ptfs-europe.com, martin.renvoize(a)ptfs-europe.com, matt.blenkinsop(a)ptfs-europe.com, pedro.amorim(a)ptfs-europe.com It could be nice to make it easy to view the months for which various usage reports have been collected for a given source (without the need to create a report in Koha) (FOLIO ERM or Coral could be source of inspiration) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 35

[Bug 37328] New: Cannot delete report after using Update and Run SQL button
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37328 Bug ID: 37328 Summary: Cannot delete report after using Update and Run SQL button Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 24.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Reports Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrewfh(a)dubcolib.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org To recreate: - create a report or edit an existing one - on the edit screen (/cgi-bin/koha/reports/guided_reports.pl?id=XXX&op=edit_form), click "Update and run SQL" - On the resulting page, where you see both your results and the edit form, click Edit and then Delete - Nothing happens. The delete confirm modal doesn't appear, so the deletion doesn't move forward. The url on that results + edit screen is just "/cgi-bin/koha/reports/guided_reports.pl" -- I don't know if that's part of the issue? The report can still be deleted from other pages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 23

[Bug 37206] New: Removing an item from a label batch should be a CSRF-protected POST operation
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37206 Bug ID: 37206 Summary: Removing an item from a label batch should be a CSRF-protected POST operation Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: ASSIGNED Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Label/patron card printing Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: oleonard(a)myacpl.org QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 36192 >From Labels -> Manage label batches -> Edit batch, the list of items in the batch has a "Delete" button for each item. Currently it's a GET operation sent via a link, but I think that should be POSTed. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36192 [Bug 36192] [OMNIBUS] CSRF Protection for Koha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 14

[Bug 30657] New: Make patron attributes available via Template Toolkit in overdues
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30657 Bug ID: 30657 Summary: Make patron attributes available via Template Toolkit in overdues Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: andrew(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org When using Template Toolkit to fetch patron values, one should be able to fetch patron attribute values. This would be useful both for printing those values into the notice content and for using those values in logic to vary the notices per patron. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 100

[Bug 25408] New: CanBookBeReserved should check "opacitemholds" policy
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 29 Oct '26

29 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25408 Bug ID: 25408 Summary: CanBookBeReserved should check "opacitemholds" policy Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: arthur.suzuki(a)biblibre.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com how to reproduce : Set an issuing rule with opacitemholds set to "Force" Make a search and select multiple records Place a hold on those records (using multi-hold records) Verify hold is placed on the record (next item available) where it shouldn't! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 161

[Bug 38228] New: Allow libraries to choose which auto renewal errors to report on in auto renew notices
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 28 Oct '26

28 Oct '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38228 Bug ID: 38228 Summary: Allow libraries to choose which auto renewal errors to report on in auto renew notices Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Notices Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: lucas(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Automatic renewal notices can report will report on many errors like 'on_reserve', 'restriction' , 'overdue' , 'auto_too_late' , 'auto_too_much_oweing' , 'too_unseen', 'too_many', etc. You can control which errors are reported on via TT in the notice. It would be nice if their was a simpler way ( system preference ) where libraries could chose which errors get reported on and which are skipped. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 1