March 2025 - Koha-bugs - lists.koha-community.org

[Bug 35142] New: Koha::Util::oclc_number should be removed in favor of Koha::Biblio::Metadata::Extractor
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 03 Sep '26

03 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35142 Bug ID: 35142 Summary: Koha::Util::oclc_number should be removed in favor of Koha::Biblio::Metadata::Extractor Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbing Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: jonathan.druart+koha(a)gmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Depends on: 30678, 34828 See bug 34828. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30678 [Bug 30678] Add OCLC_NO as option to OPACSearchForTitleIn https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34828 [Bug 34828] Add Koha::Biblio::Metadata::Extractor* classes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 44

[Bug 37680] New: inconsistencies with the search results when selecting the "Limit to records with available items" option
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Sep '26

02 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37680 Bug ID: 37680 Summary: inconsistencies with the search results when selecting the "Limit to records with available items" option Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: hammat.wele(a)inlibro.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org There seem to be inconsistencies with the search results when selecting the "Limit to records with available items" option, when we have a notice with two items if the first item is «notforloan» and the second is «notforloan» too or «withdrawn» the notice is still available. And these conditions also are showing : Case : 1- Record with first item as «notforloan» - The second is «notforloan» 2- Record with first item as «notforloan» - The second is «withdrawn» 3- Record with first item as «itemlost» - The second is «notforloan» 4- Record with first item as «itemlost» - The second is «withdrawn» 5- Record with first item «onloan» - The second is «notforloan» 6- Record with first item «onloan» - The second is «withdrawn» To reproduce: 1. Catalog a new record (record test 1) 1.1. Go to Cataloging 1.2. Click New record 1.3. Fill out the mandatory fields (000, 003, 005, 008, 040$c, 245$a, 942$c) 1.4. Click Save (No need to add an item) 1.5. Add two items, set a negative notforloan (ordered) for the two items 2. Repeat step 1, by creating a record (record test 2) with two items one negative notforloan item and the second as «withdrawn» item 3. Repeat step 1, and creating all the record in «Case» section 4. Go to the Opac and search for the created record 5. Click on «Limit to records with available items» ----> All the created items is still showing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 42

[Bug 34488] New: Import default framework
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Sep '26

02 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34488 Bug ID: 34488 Summary: Import default framework Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 23.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: System Administration Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: viliam.polonec(a)snk.sk QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com I am testing 23.05.01 version, so we can update our production ILS. I found that I can't import default framework for bibliographic records. I tried export it and import. But with no success. KOHA shows MARC Framework for default MARC framework Create framework for () using selector with frameworks After that nothings changed I test it on two different instalations. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 8

[Bug 24807] New: Add "year" type to improve sorting by publication date
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Sep '26

02 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=24807 Bug ID: 24807 Summary: Add "year" type to improve sorting by publication date Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Searching - Elasticsearch Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: glasklas(a)gmail.com When sorting on date-of-publication (a year, field 008, positions 7-10), the current behavior when the field contains an invalid year (containing word characters like "uuuu" or just whitespace), these results appear first when sorting in descending order. Invalid values like these should really not be indexed at all. If so (having null values instead) they will always appear last when sorting, regardless of sort order. This fix adds a "year" search field type, that will reject any non-year values, resulting in a more user friendly sorting behavior. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 70

[Bug 23333] New: Course Reserves: Instuctor search box positioning
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Sep '26

02 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23333 Bug ID: 23333 Summary: Course Reserves: Instuctor search box positioning Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Staff Client Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: claire_gravely(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Created attachment 91567 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=91567&action=ed… Screenshot When creating a new course in the course reserves module the "Instructor search" box is oddly positioned. Perhaps it could be moved more in line with 'Instructors'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 22456] New: Customers Cancelling their Pending Holds
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Sep '26

02 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22456 Bug ID: 22456 Summary: Customers Cancelling their Pending Holds Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: 18.05 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: OPAC Assignee: oleonard(a)myacpl.org Reporter: christofer.zorn(a)ajaxlibrary.ca QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org Target Milestone: --- Good morning! I'm not sure if I should have piggybacked this off of the previous ticket, but I'd like to open the discussion on bug 18856 again. We'd like the ability to have patrons cancel their holds once they have been pulled by staff and are awaiting pick up. Our previous catalogue (Bibliocommons) allowed the cancellation of holds once it as captured. This feature was well like and used by our patrons who had determined they didn't need/want the item any longer. This gave the perception that they were freeing up the item for the next person. We have fielded a number of grumpy comments since our migration about the inability to perform this functionality. >From my perspective, if we're allowing patrons to place holds and cancel them before they're captured, we should offer the ability to cancel them up until they're picked up. At the very least, this should be a system option to allow the Library to choose whether they'd like to enable this functionality. Even if the implemented functionality is a placebo for the user ... offer them the ability to cancel the hold and have it remove from their account. As long as optically it appears they've cancelled the hold, there is no harm. If desired, a report could be run to allow staff to pull those items from the shelf if needed. I'm more than happy to elaborate if needed on this, but I feel that this is a feature that is currently missing from Koha that would be a boon to customer service. Thanks Christofer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 166

[Bug 38650] New: We should only fill title level or specific item holds when a patron checks out an item
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Sep '26

02 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38650 Bug ID: 38650 Summary: We should only fill title level or specific item holds when a patron checks out an item Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: Main Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com Follow up to bug 14549 - we handled the case here to fill a patron's reserve when they get another copy, however, we didn't cover the case where their reserve is title level. To recreate: 1 - Place a hold for patron A on item #1 of a record 2 - Place a hold for patron B on item #2 of a record 3 - Issue item #2 to patron A - their hold on item #1 is filled incorrectly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 37

[Bug 36024] New: Cancellation requests for waiting holds - errors caused by duplicate requests
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Sep '26

02 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36024 Bug ID: 36024 Summary: Cancellation requests for waiting holds - errors caused by duplicate requests Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: emily.lamancusa(a)montgomerycountymd.gov QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com The Koha OPAC prevents duplicate waiting hold cancellation requests at the interface level, but if a duplicate request is sent through the API (e.g. from a discovery layer), it is not prevented. This causes the cancellation request to display twice on the Holds With Cancellation Requests table on the staff interface. When the item is checked in, the cancellation request and checkin logic are (at least partially) processed, but the page displays a 500 error, which is confusing to staff and prevents any modals from displaying. To reproduce on KTD: 1. Circulation Rules: add a Default waiting hold cancellation policy of all / all / yes (i.e. cancellation allowed for all patron categories and item types) 2. System preferences: Enable RESTBasicAuth 3. Place a hold and check the item in to set the hold to Waiting 4. In a kshell, send an API hold cancellation request from the command line: curl -u koha:koha --request DELETE 'http://127.0.0.1:8081/api/v1/holds/1' --header "Content-type: application/json" --header "x-koha-override: cancellation-request-flow" (if the hold ID is not 1, change the hold ID at the end of the request path accordingly) 5. Repeat step 4 6. Go to the Holds Waiting page and view the Holds With Cancellation Requests tab --> Note that two identical cancellation requests appear for that hold 7. Check in the item --> Note the error message 8. Confirm that the item state has been modified: --> Hold is gone from the Holds Waiting page --> Hold is gone from the bib record --> Item shows as available on the bib record and last seen date has been updated --> If RecordLocalUseOnReturn is enabled, a local use entry has been added to the statistics table -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 35573] New: Koha is no correctly warning of overridden items when placing a hold if AllowHoldPolicyOverride
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Sep '26

02 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35573 Bug ID: 35573 Summary: Koha is no correctly warning of overridden items when placing a hold if AllowHoldPolicyOverride Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 - low Component: Hold requests Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: nick(a)bywatersolutions.com QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: gmcharlt(a)gmail.com If AllowHoldPolicyOverride is enabled we are not warning that items require override if there are valid pickup locations. Regressions caused by (me on) bug 30687 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 25

[Bug 33538] New: Allow for independent shibboleth autocreate and sync mapping
by bugzilla-daemon＠bugs.koha-community.org 02 Sep '26

02 Sep '26

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33538 Bug ID: 33538 Summary: Allow for independent shibboleth autocreate and sync mapping Change sponsored?: --- Product: Koha Version: master Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 - low Component: Authentication Assignee: koha-bugs(a)lists.koha-community.org Reporter: pgsengstock(a)wisc.edu QA Contact: testopia(a)bugs.koha-community.org CC: dpavlin(a)rot13.org Shibboleth auth's autocreate and sync functions both rely on the same //shibboleth/mapping block in koha-conf.xml. Because autocreate requires mapping and/or defaults for branchcode and categorycode, this has the undesired affect of overwriting manual edits to borrowers on later syncs if the those fields are not delivered via shibboleth and explicitly mapped. Example: 1) Patron signs in for first time and borrower account is autocreated with a default branch and categorycode. 2) Staff update patron to set new branch and category codes as needed (e.g. from "SSOAUTH" to "MAINLIB"). 3) On next sign-in, patron's mapped data is synced, but branch and category codes are overwritten with the defaults. Suggested workaround is to differentiate //shibboleth/autocreatemapping vs //shibboleth/syncmapping. This allows greater control over which fields are mapped for autocreate vs sync. This schema change would not be backward compatible, though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes.

1 75